preview

The Similarities And Differences Of Confucius And Sima Qian

Decent Essays

One can infer from the two given sources that there are two main figures: Confucius, a Zhou philosopher and Sima Qian, a Han Historian. Both of them had various depictions of the non-Chinese peoples in their respective eras. So, what are the points of comparison in which we can uncover the similarities and differences of these depictions? The essay will seek to answer the question by first discussing the different depictions of the non-Chinese peoples by both Confucius and Sima Qian based on the definition of the term “non-Chinese” and the extent of threats, the attitude towards the non-Chinese peoples, their strengths, and the idea of assimilation. The similarities will later be explored through the concept of archery and the concept of profit and individualism. Lastly, the degree of difference will be discussed in the concluding paragraph.

Firstly, both sources depict non-Chinese peoples as “Barbarians”. However, each source has a different focus: a general definition or a specific one. This could be due to the different extent of their threats in the Zhou and Han Dynasty. In the Analects of Confucius, Confucius briefly mentioned about the non-Chinese peoples, as they were not a threat during the …show more content…

Confucius mentioned that a gentleman would only compete if it were regarding archery. Arguably, it can be seen that Confucius recognizes the importance of archery especially in the six Arts of his teachings. Similarly, the archery culture is prevalent in the nomadic culture of the Xiongnu, where “little boys are able to shoot birds and mice with bows and arrows” and “all the men can shoot and serve as cavalry”. Moreover, they hunt for food wherever they go and do not have the culture of agriculture. Hence the concept of archery is relatively important for survival to the Xiongnu. Thus, the concept of archery is important in both sources’ depictions of the non-Chinese

Get Access