“The South” by Jorge Luis Borges portrays the life of Juan Dahlmann, a librarian from Buenos Aires, wherein a sequence of unfortunate events brings him, eventually and triumphantly, to the South. But the story might be as mundane as Dahlmann’s northern life without its stunning conclusion: rather than living happily in the South like he’s always longed for, Dahlmann willingly dies the first night he gets there. Dahlmann dies just before his promised life can even begin, yet he finds joy in it. His bizarre mindset, then, demands explanation and exploration. Dahlmann is in fact not mad nor is Borges being melodramatic: his tragedy is but the tragedy of a dreamer who mingles dream with the reality, dangerously. Dahlmann lives by the …show more content…
Dahlmann’s South and its values are further substantiated in opposition to those of the North. The North is physically where Dahlmann works and lives, the city of Buenos Aires, and mentally portrayed as a place of identity crisis, fear, and restriction, as enacted in the sanatorium: though Dahlmann is cured of his illness there, he suffers many symbolic miseries. Right after he wakes up from the operation, he finds himself “in a cell much like the bottom of a well” (Borges 25). The word “cell” implies that he is trapped in the sanatorium like a prisoner in a jail. It’s a metaphor for the restraints the northern society imposes. Then Dahlmann is in a state of self-loathing over his identity. It’s a reflection of the identity-crisis in the North, which relates back to his entry into the sanatorium, when “his clothes were stripped from him, his head was shaved” (Borges 25). His clothes, items representing individual taste, being “stripped” from him is perhaps symbolic of how the North
Reading The Night We Became People Again was a pleasant and refreshing experience. By comparing Jose Luis Gonzalez's tale with the work of his contemporaries, we see his style of writing is different. His way of developing a plot is more lively and cheerful; he even includes humor in many of his dialogs and events. In The Night We Became People Again, Jose Luis Gonzalez is telling the story of the day his first son was born. He starts off with a normal day at work when a longtime and mentally challenged friend of him, Crazytop, rams in and announces Jose's wife is in labor. They both rush out and face a few setbacks along the way, like a power outage during their ride in the subway. Soon enough, he arrives and gets the opportunity to greet
Have you ever referred to someone as “high class,” “middle class,” or “low class?” The article “Class In America” is a very educated read and describes the way people are characterized by their “class.” I think that this article informs all types of readers and allows people to see how people are grouped based on themselves. “Class in America” is written to show and prove to society that people do not talk about “class” anymore, because of the way the world looks at it today. Gregory Mantosis is the author of the article, and he uses many facts and data to prove his points.
It does this simply through very careful word choice, as it says “he felt that if he choose, then, or to dream his death, this would have been the death he would’ve chosen or dreamt”. The passage, as shown above, uses the words dream “die” and “dream” in order to evoke a feeling of insecurity within the reader, causing them to wonder if all of theses events within the South of Argentina were simply a dream of his while he’s still in the hospital, either dead or dying, in order to fulfill his wish that he never could before. Also, it gives the option that he truly did make it to the South but was killed in the knife fight and is dreaming about him walking away from it unharmed right before he dies. Altogether, the function of the last paragraph is to cause the reader to think critically and examine details of the story more closely to draw the conclusion of the story themselves, as to when and where Dahlmann actually died and where the story itself shifts from reality to fantasy.
The book “The Other America”, written by Michael Harrington, describes poverty in America in the 1950s and 1960s, when America became one of the most affluent and advanced nations in the world. The book was written in 1962, and Harrington states that there were about 50,000,000 (about 25% of the total population) poor in America at that time. The author did extensive research with respect to the family income levels to derive the poverty numbers, and used his own observations and experiences to write this book. This book addresses the reasons for poverty, the nature of poverty, the culture of poverty, the blindness of Middle Class America with respect to poverty, and the responsibility of all Americans in addressing the issue of poverty in America.
"Battleground America," written by Jill Lepore, provides a strong history of guns and the way they have changed in the eyes of the American through the years. She proves her point with strong evidence throughout her article, sprinkling it with opinion and argument that is strongly supported. She presents her argument to convince her audience that the open availability of guns allows citizens to undeservingly purchase them by displaying the credibility in her sources, using negative connotations in her speech, and the strength and objectivity only a strong logos appeal can provide.
Wendell Berry’s past is more than just his own in “My Great-Grandfather’s Slaves,” but his past is intertwined with the slaves that grew up with. A quick reading of this poem by Berry would not give the reader that he was connected with the slaves, but rather that they lived separate lives. Berry says he sees the slaves and their activities but does not ever write about how they are connected until the very last stanza. After reading the final stanza it gives the rest of the poem a new meaning and if the reader does not take the time to closely re-read the writing they will miss out on what Berry is really trying to portray. Wendell Berry is trying to show the reader how his past is linked with the past of his grandfather’s slaves with his
What are some ways that we welcome back ex cons into society if we do at all? What help determined our attitude towards these incrassated victims whether they are guilty or not? These are questions and situations that sociologist take time to research in society. This is mainly done because it affects society in some sort of way and it’s their job to find out why things happen and how can we help better the problems. Most offenders are from a lower income society or belong to an oppress group. The victims of coarse are the people who the harm is being done to, which by law there are consequences for their action. The problem, that leave one thinking is the kind of crimes people committed, or some may not commit any at all, probably just at the wrong place at the wrong time and they still happen to receive harsh penalty, being stigmatize as a criminal on record causing them to struggle in society.
The Jungle by Upton Sinclair is a vivid account of life for the working class in the early 1900s. Jurgis Rudkus and his family travel to the United States in search of the American dream and an escape from the rigid social structure of Lithuania. Instead, they find a myriad of new difficulties. Sinclair attributes their problems to the downfalls of capitalism in the United States. While America’s system was idealistic for Jurgis and his family at first, the mood of the story quickly transforms to assert that capitalism is evil. This theme drives the author’s message and relay of major issues throughout the entirety of the novel. The idea of capitalism and social Darwinism is to
Critics often argue that Upton Sinclair, author of many classic American novels including The Jungle, was cynical and bitter even. However if one were to dig just a bit deeper they may realize that Sinclair was spot on in his idea that this “American dream” that our country sells is actually a work of fiction.
What societal and government reforms did “The Jungle” call for. Do you feel this novel was effective in bringing about any of these reforms.
The South vs. The South by William Freehling is a narrative that focuses on the civil war that affected a vast number of Southerners who opposed the Confederacy regardless of whether they were white or black. These “anti-Confederates,” as termed by Freehling comprised Slaves and Boarder state whites who together formed half the southern population and were significant to the Union victory. By weakening the Confederacy military, contributing manpower and resources to the Union and dividing the southern home front, the anti-Confederates made a critical contribution to the Union war efforts that hastened the end of the war leading to the Union’s victory. The U.S was not the only house that was divided; Divisions between pro-and anti-Confederates, white and black, and the loyalty of both upper and lower states to slavery contributed a lot to the downfall of the confederates. “Divisions within the South helped pave the path toward war. The same divisions behind army lines helped turn the war against the slaveholders.”(p.10). William Freehling argues that more than 450,000 Union troops from the South, especially southern blacks and border state whites, helped in the defeat of the confederates. Further, when the southern Border States rejected the Confederacy, more than a half of the South’s capacity swelled the North’s advantage.
The thing is that Cesar Chavez Harriet Tubman are trying to make a difference in the world and have justice for people. The poetry “Elegy on the death of Cesar Chavez.” The story is by Rudolfo Anaya it is a poetry about how Cesar Chavez had brought hope, and joy twords people, and how he had inspired people and he Cesar Chavez had fought for farm workers so they could live in a more better way then how they use to. The biography “The conductor On The Underground Railroad” by Ann Petry the story is about how Harriet Tubman learned how to navigate using the north star. How both of these people are the same is that they both are trying to help people, and they are trying to make it better for people to live in.
The phrase, “We the people”, holds a lot of meaning to American citizens. As the first three words of the United States Constitution, it signifies a core value intended to act as a unifying factor in America’s democratic society: popular sovereignty. This is the idea of a majority rules, or to put more simply, the one with the most votes wins. The U.S. system of government relies upon the fact that the American people are capable of coming together to make informed decisions about matters that will ultimately better the lives of everyone. Despite this, however, there are certain instances in which a minority group will impose on or have more influence than the majority group. This phenomenon occurs all the time in politics, as politicians tend to regard the predilections of small groups of citizens as opposed to the general populace.
Throughout history, illegal immigrants have experienced judgments and challenges in America. In “The Border on Our Backs,” by Roberto Rodriguez, and in “Se Habla Entitlement,” by Star Parker, the two authors both address immigration and hold angry attitudes towards aspects of how it is handled even though the reason for their anger is very different. Rodriguez, an immigrant, uses a personal approach taking it to a more personal level unlike Parker, born into a minority family, who uses actual facts from American history as well as providing several factors of the topic and numerical statistics. At first, her essay has more validity to the reader, than Rodriguez’ essay by its objectivity. Demonstrations by immigrants are not as apartheid as Rodriguez or Parker describes, and although Latinos are a separate culture, they need such demonstrations for acceptance and for a voice to be heard.
In this essay I will discuss to what extent Maiken Umbach interpretation of the apparent second city syndrome feeling rings true in Eduardo Mendoza’s La Ciudad de los Prodigios through a political, social and economic standpoint. Furthermore, I will analyse How Mendoza expresses his own personal feelings of the relationship between Barcelona and Madrid in the novel in regards to Barcelona and Catalonia’s desire to be independent from Spain.