The study population and sample population were clearly identified in the Methodology section. The targeted population included about four hundred university students taken from eight public universities located in the country of Malaysia with special preference for senior students. Rationale for senior students was based on maturity and attitudes about their future career choices. The selection of the study sample was purposive and convenient due to easy access by researchers. A weakness of the study seemed to be the sample population. The size of the population seemed to be inadequate with respect to generalizing findings and results. The inclusion criteria were clearly identified. Approvals were received by universities participating in the distribution of survey questions. The researchers randomly chose students from the population sample to partake in the survey. The sample population of respondents was evenly distributed among universities participating in the research study.
Ethical Considerations Participants were informed and provided consent to contribute to the online survey. Confidentiality was not explicitly stated, however the use of the commercial survey program, Surveymonkey®, implied confidentiality among participants. Ethical considerations were not specifically stated. The safety of participants was implied, due to the use of consent for participation in the study. Participants completed surveys within their respective university classes. There
To ensure the proposed study is academically, professionally, and ethically sound, researchers shall complete a risk assessment on the proposed method (participants, materials and design) of the study. This risk assessment will form the basis of the application to Swinburne University’s Research Ethics Office for ethical review. This application will address the risks identified with the participants used, including recruitment and informed consent, as well as data and publication arrangements.
Provided to each subject was a consent form to review and sign before their participation in this study. The researcher excluded any identifiable information from the data collection measures. Subjects received a number as they signed in for the information session. The researcher used these numbers to link the subjects to their surveys and their clinical assessments. Their numbers coordinated with the attendance form which was in the sole possession of the researcher. Institution
The strengths of this article is that the author uses information from a survey that was
Internal validity of this study included data collection process and student personal interest in education. For example, students may have scored in exam because they concern about their own education. Reliability of this study instrument has not been tested. This is the first time this group will have this survey. There is no former survey to use as a standard to see if there are many changes.
The population is undergraduate students of UM and we eliminated the unsuitable sample based on the information of questionnaires (exclude the outliers, blank questionnaire, context is contradictory and so on). Then we selected 30 questionnaires per college year which year 1 to year 4 (30*4=120) from all the completed questionnaires. We used convenience sampling method to distribute the online questionnaires openly. And we received the completed questionnaires online which are from google form.
Surveys were coded by a numbering system developed by the researcher, to protect the confidentiality of the participants. For student records any identifier for each person were deleted ensuring privacy and anonymity to the researcher
This study will not be anonymous as it requires us to collect names for the purpose of completing this research. For the purpose of this study, information will remain confidential. To ensure confidentiality, Non-involving persons or agencies will not have access to information collected to ensure confidentiality.
Forty surveys were completed successfully which resulted in very conclusive answers. Before conducting the survey all ethical guidelines were followed: a disclaimer was placed at the start of the survey informing participants that all information will remain confidential; the participants privacy will be respected; there will be no lasting harm and the participants will know this is entirely voluntary as the participant has the freedom to refuse or withdraw at any time without
The researcher will assume that the respondents will answer all survey questions and that the questions will be answered honestly. The researcher will assure the respondents that the survey will be handled anonymously and that it will be confidential.
Ethical Considerations: This study was reviewed and approved by La Salle University Institutional Review Board. Furthermore, the researchers clearly specified how informed consent and confidentiality was handled in the field of study. “Participants in the study received a written
This survey spans across the mid-level and high-level schools of United States, which are believed to represent a cross-section of the national population. About 66 – 80% of the American schools participate in the survey on an average, and the students’ participation rate stands at an average of 79 – 83%.
The population of interest is a sample of offenders in various (state and federal) prison facilities in the United States. The study will include a sampling pool of both male and females ranging in age 18+. To help with initial involvement, the study will include: a cover letter, a consent form, a pre-demographic and information survey, and a self-addressed stamped envelope. To ensure a response, a reminder and thank you card will be sent to each participant two-weeks after the initial packet was sent.
There were 523 participants all undergraduates from psyc121 course at Victoria University of Wellington. All participants who gave consent and completed the questionnaire received course credit. This was also approved by the ethics committee and all participation in the study remained anonymous.
The online survey is easy to use for respondents when compare to other method like interview as people can access internet to answer survey, complete the survey in a short time. Increase in internet use communication can benefit the research, online survey research was a time-consuming task, different participants can do the survey at the same time and it is convenience and easy to reach people.