The Success of Learning Organisations Is Predicated on Particular Internal Organisational Relationships and Particular Relationships Between the Organisation and Its Environment. Discuss.

An organization who strives to adapt with the surrounding environment, internally and externally, has a better chance of surviving in a competitive market than one who does not. To be an effective learning organization the management must be willing to listen to its employees and their customers to grow their brands. When management is open with their employees through all levels of the organization, the employees will be more willing to speak their minds. Once employees speak up with innovative ideas, leadership must show they are listening by giving feedback or integrating those ideas into their operations. Human relations allow this type of interaction between leaders and workers to take

Many companies are very keen and ready to clinch Work Base Learning in an organization, not mainly because it provide you with lifelong learning, but also it is an important ingredient of what Senge (1990) has termed as the ‘learning organization’. A learning organization is a place in which the learning and flair of persons is backed and promoted so that the organization itself be able to form its future and it also very important to gain competitive advantage.

For most companies, identifying what a learning organization should be and actually becoming one is tricky at best, impossible at worst. One way that manager's and companies can promote the concept of being a learning organization is to assess whether the company is in need of a short-term fix or whether it is more focused on long-term results. Organizational learning is a long-term activity that will build competitive advantage over time and requires sustained management attention, commitment, and effort. Learning organizations maximize their competitive positions during strong economic times and they prudently train their employees and prepare for change even in turbulent times. As a result, learning organizations and learning

A learning organization is an organization that can change quickly, adapting to the new rules that the market environment has created. Businesses that know how to learn and develop quickly and effectively will thrive; those that don’t will not survive. It is easy to think of newer companies like Apple and Google as being the best learning organizations. Yet, some of the best examples of organizational learning practices are found in more mature organizations, such as the U.S. military. Throughout our lives we collect tidbits of information, knowledge through what we experience, we try to apply the lesson from these experience as we grow, we are curious by nature, adventurous we are learners and for many of us the process of learning never stops.

There have four characteristics in the supportive learning environment: Psychological safety, appreciation of differences, openness to new ideas, and time for reflection. The four steps of learning processes: First, generation. Company need to develop and test new products or services. Second, collection. Company need to collect customers, technological and information about competitors. Third, interpretation. Through rigorous analysis to identify and solve problems. At last, dissemination of information. Company should move information into customers' hand and heads quickly and efficiently. Leadership reinforcing learning means leaders should get some feedback from employees in order to motivating employees ask and discuss problems. The authors use learning organization survey to determine the organizations. After survey, authors conclude four principles about learning organization: "Leadership alone is insufficient" - Leaders need open their minded for questioning, cogitative listening, consider a

The concept of a learning organization knows its roots back to Garratt in 1987, which later on in the late 90’s was revived by Peter Senge. Senge (1990) focuses on the organization acting as a unit where innovative ideas are generated and common goals are reached. Collective commitment of the team is fundamental. Furthermore, according to Senge (1990), the organization must go through 5 domains in order to reach the productivity of a learning organization: systems thinking, personal mastery, mental models, building shared vision and team learning.

This paper, therefore, explores, discusses and analyzes the integrated role of Learning organization (as a structural entity) and the organizational learning (as an intrinsic know-how process) that

This paper will summarize the organizational learning strategy and how it is significant as well as essential, specifically in the course of the progression periods of a company, or once new technology or new techniques within an industry are implemented. As a result, organizational learning has established itself to be one of the most efficient ways for an entire company, a division or a team to accept a wide range of new polls, tactics and concepts to allow for growth and improvement (Senge, 1990). Thus, when comparing to traditional learning techniques, or classrooms, individual learning schedules and other techniques are employed, organizational learning has proven itself to be far more efficient and effective overall, while costing less time and money among other resources.

This paper describes and discusses the practical steps taken by Peter Senge in identifying “Why aren’t we all working for learning organizations?” The concept of an adaptive and generative learning organization is defined, and will discuss how organizational learning faces critical issues within its organization. First, the organization’s single-loop learning is discussed and reviewed. Second, the organization’s command and control structure is discussed whether it can be revamped to provide better attributes to an organizations learning. Last, the core paradigm is defined and discussed on its impact within the organization. In 2010 the professors’, John Seddon and Brendan

Garvin, (1993). Defined a “learning organization,” as “an organization skilled at creating, acquiring, and transferring knowledge, and at modifying its behavior to reflect new knowledge and insights.” (p. 80). That said, Garvin qualified his definition, by requiring two necessary conditions: (a) for organizational learning to take place, new ideas needed to be introduced. (b) the new ideas had to bring about the improvement of the organization. This requirement or condition meant that the new ideas would be a catalyst for change. The

The term ‘organizational learning’ is usually used interchangeably with the term ‘learning Organization’. Tsang (1997) is

1. The main argument presented in this article is that organizations need to become learning organisations, that is organisations that will communicate within themselves on all levels of the organisation and work problems out together in order to be competitive in the face of ever changing circumstances in the business.

Jashapara (2011) defines organisational learning as the processes of improving organisational actions through better knowledge and understanding.

A learning organization is one that is able to transform its culture and behaviors from an occurred situation. This includes the organization realizing a repeated pattern of behaviors that is not growing or helping the organization in the right direction. When organizations admit to certain truths or facts and acknowledge flawed behaviors, then change can start. Organizations attempt to change by restructuring and reorganizing the company. Organizations learn only through individuals who learn. Individual learning does not guarantee organizational learning but, without it no organizational learning occurs’ (Senge 1990).

Peter Senge argues that not only we humans learn, but organizations also. However, learning itself may not be enough for the organization to survive in this ever-challenging era. In his book, The Fifth Discipline, Senge introduced five ‘disciplines’, namely systems thinking, personal mastery, mental models, building shared vision, and team learning, that characterizes an organization as a learning organization.