Literature is in one sense immune to the passage of time, and in another sense exposed to it. Once put to paper, a story survives forever (unless it is carelessly lost or actively destroyed). But the era and the social context in which a work was written, while they can be studied and understood, cannot be preserved or recreated. It was context— the context of her time, the reality of Victorian life— that first ignited and then threatened to snuff out the flame of public intrigue towards Anne Bronte's second and final novel. And while The Tenant of Wildfell Hall— though it did not become as firmly entrenched in the canon of English literature as the works of Anne's sisters— survived, its flame is now dimmed by the context of our time, by the …show more content…
Bronte's chess match, when played against a modern reader, is too easily won, and thus the novel can seem drawn out, like a match in which the losing player stubbornly refuses to tip his king. Even critics as early as 1913, well before today but well after the publication of the novel and the passage of crucial property laws for women in England, thought the Tenant's flame dimmer than that of Jane Eyre. Bronte biographer May Sinclair is often quoted as saying that Helen's slamming of the door reverberated throughout Victorian England, but the actual quote paints the scene as more of a spark then a fire: "The slamming of that bedroom door fairly resounds through the long emptiness of Anne's novel." Of course, 2017 and 1913 are entirely different eras and the progress made between Bronte's day and Sinclair's pales in comparison to that made between Sinclair's and ours. The notion that our state of "being better off than we were before" diminishes the importance of Anne's novel would be a mistaken one. But if a novel is shocking in a backwards society, it loses its intrigue when that society is turned around. The modern reader accepts — demands, even — the choices Helen makes, and wonders why she does not make them sooner. …show more content…
We live in the digital age, the age of mass-media, 24/7 news, celebrity worship, and short attention spans. People want to be surprised when they consume the world around them, but if one is to provide them with that surprise, they are scarcely allotted 140 characters, let alone 487 pages. It is hard to attract public attention and nearly impossible to keep it for a sustained period of time. It is even harder to attract it in positive fashion. Perhaps nobody lives as squarely (and positively) in the public eye as musical superstar Beyonce Knowles. Beyonce and Anne Bronte are unlikely to be mentioned in the same sentence--- if anything, Anne has more in common with Solange, Beyonce's overshadowed younger sister. But in 2016, Beyonce released an album that turned the internet on its head by confronting the plight of a married woman. The contents of and response to Lemonade demonstrate that gender equality and issues in marriage are still both important to modern consumers and able to shock them. The album's explosion also demonstrates how our craving for shock has been changed. While Bronte's character's long account of abuse — which, as Charlotte noted, spared no detail — is so well-understood as problematic by today's readers that, as one critic said, it can "feel like watching a car wreck in slow motion," Beyonce captivated the public by merely hinting that her husband and fellow
Women who had no claim to wealth or beauty received the harshest of realities in America’s Victorian era. Author Charlotte Bronte – from America’s Victorian era – examines and follows the life of a girl born into these conditions in her gothic novel Jane Eyre (of which the main character’s name
In its simplest form, Charlotte Bronte’s Jane Eyre tells the story of a young woman, Jane Eyre, who grows up poor, makes the decision to be independent, does so, and, eventually, marries rich. The novel follows her from her childhood to her reunion with the love of her life and she, throughout it, deals with classism and sexism and exhibits her own form of feminism. By the end, it becomes clear that, with this semi-autobiographical novel, Charlotte Bronte was providing a criticism on society’s discrimination toward those of a lower class, a subtle argument against the male-dominated society’s treatment of women, and an even subtler call to action for women to find their own agency outside of the men in their lives. On another end, however,
For nearly twenty years, Beyoncé has lived her life in the public eye yet she has always kept her cool, been submissive, and rather quiet when it came to her personal endeavors however after releasing the film “Lemonade”, we are able to see her in a vulnerable light. In Jeremy Helliger’s article: “Dear Beyhive: Stop Whining. Beyoncé Still Hasn’t Earned Her Album Of The Year Grammy” he addresses the idea that although Beyoncé was able to encourage black women to be proud and free, she also she missed the mark by adding raunchy, over the top content to her vulnerability.
The Tenant of Wildfell Hall contains one of the earliest examples of marital abuse written in the Victorian Era. It prominently displays women being abused, separated from society and their subsequent solitude. The author, Anne Brontë, did not shy away from certain ‘taboo’ topics, like alcohol abuse, domestic violence, and sexual assault and has been criticised for it, even by her own sister Charlotte. Domestic violence has been around for many years and yet it was, and still is, treated as a forbidden subject that should be handled quietly and without causing a commotion. Anne Brontë does not ignore these issues. She gives a clear look at how someone can change overtime and how the effects of alcohol are not to be taken lightly. The Tenant
To contain a life, or even some fraction of it, in a single book is certainly a tall order among tall orders. But Jane Erye is so thoroughly and immersively suffused with the minutest realities of adolescence and early adulthood that I can’t help but see every life in it. The eponymous heroine’s story is mine, yours, his, hers, theirs, anyone’s, everyone’s. Analyzing the novel via Virginia Woolf’s literary catechism, however, yields something of an oddity. For all its banal but tangible plausibility, which was so many pages and episodes and humanities in the making, Brontë’s novel does not accord with the ideals Woolf crusades for, namely concepts that the latter refers to as “integrity” and “incandescence.” Who’s afraid of Virginia Woolf?
Charlotte Bronte’s novel Jane Eyre embraces many feminist views in opposition to the Victorian feminine ideal. Charlotte Bronte herself was among the first feminist writers of her time, and wrote this book in order to send the message of feminism to a Victorian-Age Society in which women were looked upon as inferior and repressed by the society in which they lived. This novel embodies the ideology of equality between a man and woman in marriage, as well as in society at large. As a feminist writer, Charlotte Bronte created this novel to support and spread the idea of an independent woman who works for herself, thinks for herself, and acts of her own accord.
Beyoncé. She’s one of the world’s most beloved pop stars, idolized and respected by millions of women and men around the world. What is it that makes Beyoncé Knowles “Queen B” among the young people of today’s society? To state it simply, it is her role as a mediated symbol. She is an idol of women empowerment and beauty. Beyoncé, as a powerful and renowned black woman, alters the pre-existing hegemonic ideology of “white male” equaling power and success in American society. In doing so, she also reinforces the more modern concepts of this Post-Fordist society by “keeping different from the Jones’”. Though some sources disagree, this essay will argue that because of society’s hegemonic ideology surrounding what constitutes power and the “ideal woman”, Beyoncé has become a revolutionary symbol representing minority and women empowerment through the use of media. As an symbol she has and is continuing to demonstrate more modern ideological structures, which in turn demonstrates continuously changing societal ideologies.
Novels are necessarily demonstrative as they give form to a world totally at the author’s disposal not to assert his point but to display it and thus memorable, relatable, and complex books reinforce the author’s point through every action or thought of the main character allowing their meanings and implications to transgress their temporal restrictions. Charlotte Brontë successfully escapes the fetters of her historical period in Jane Eyre which provides meaningful and dense passages that illuminate Jane’s character through her description, analysis, and interaction with her environment, constantly pushing Jane’s inner conflict to the foreground, making her stream of consciousness the constant that unifies the whole work. The feud between
For many years, Anne Brontë’s literary works have been viewed as classics of English literature. Brontë had a unique way of being able to portray realistic situations in her poems and short novels (PoemHunter, 2014). She was not afraid to bring up the realities behind male alcoholism and brutality in her most famous pieces of literature, Agnes Grey and The Tenant of Wildfell Hall. In addition, she also wrote several poems including Farewell, A Prayer, and Confidence. Anne Brontë is part of a literary dynasty with her famous sisters Charlotte Brontë, known for writing Jane Eyre, and Emily Brontë, known for writing Wuthering Heights. Although Anne Brontë is thought of as the least talented Brontë sister, she has continued to dominate English Literature for almost 200 years (Devaney, 2014).
Jane Eyre, often interpreted as a bildungsroman, or a coming-of-age story, goes further than the traditional “happy ending,” commonly represented by getting married. Instead, the novel continues beyond this romantic expectation to tell full the story of Jane’s life, revealing her continual dissatisfaction with conventional expectations of her social era; as a result, many literary critics have taken it upon themselves to interpret this novel as a critique of the rigid class system present in 19th century Victorian society. One literary critic in particular, Chris R. Vanden Bossche, analyzes Charlotte Brontë’s Jane Eyre through a Marxist lens, asserting the importance of class structure and social ideology as historical context and attributing this to the shaping of the novel as a whole. This approach of analysis properly addresses Brontë’s purposeful contrast of submission and rebellion used to emphasize Jane’s determined will for recognition as an equal individual.
Jane Austen is well known as a novelist for her satirical representation of female characters in late Georgian society. During this period, novel writing and reading was still a controversial topic, and as such was incorporated in her book Northanger Abbey (1817), which has at its core a young female protagonist obsessed with novels. We can clearly interpret Northanger Abbey as Austen’s satirical response to the social conventions decrying novel reading, as she uses an intrusive narrator and more subtle supplementary techniques to comment on and satirize the debate surrounding novels.
“I am no bird and no net ensnares me; I am a free human being with an independent will” (Bronte, Jane Eyre 293). In the Victorian time period Charlotte Bronte lived the unequal life as a woman, like many others. The only difference is Bronte did not believe in living in inequality, and she wrote about her hardships in her literature. In her book, Jane Eyre, the reader can see many similarities in her main character’s life and her own. Jane Eyre has many ways of showing how Victorian women were expected to be and act, included in the life of Jane. Bronte also continues her portrayal of the inequality of women and the decision of love versus autonomy through two of her poems, “Life” and “The Wife’s Will.” Charlotte Bronte displays the inequality in life of women in the Victorian era by taking her life and revitalizing it into themes of her works, by providing a journey of discovery of love or autonomy.
Literature can embody time, start a revolution, or be used as a coaster under the flattest fizzless cup of Pepsi. It can tell historical triumphs or new wave gyres, yet in each of these examples, literature has a single and simple purpose. It is easy to tell time through a book because a reader can simply glance back out their window to check. It is easy to grab a group of friends read a guidebook on revolution and paint some signs. A hipster might think it’s chic to take an old copy of Peter Rabbit, cut it into a circle, and proudly place his Pepsi atop. These examples are easy, but again, these forms of Literature are old. A myth with new literature is that it cannot tell time, rebel, or be cut up as quickly. Modern literature is confusing, bewildering, wild, and beyond the page. Difficulty is the hand that puts the books, short stories, or poems down after one may pick them up. Yet, modern British literature can be especially trying and monstrously influential because the authors did not only challenge their peers or their government, but the universe. A strategy to challenge the universe must first challenge the reader. If someone needed a clock, they would be able to find it within May Wedderburn Cannan’s “Rouen”. If someone wanted to rebel against the world, a reader would be able to discern a reasonable direction in William Butler Yeats’ “Easter 1916”. If someone needed a coaster, they would be able to find the one piece of Literature accepting of its’ new purpose
This essay will explore the function of setting in Jane Eyre, and will argue how Bronte used setting to portray, the oppression of women in a patriarchal Victorian society. The settings of Gateshead and Thornfield will be discussed in detail, to emphasise how Bronte’s representation of her heroine’s Gothic imagination depicted the feminist issues of the time. In addition it will consider differences, and similarities, between the protagonist Jane Eyre as ‘The Angel of the house,’ and the antagonist Bertha Mason as ‘The Madwoman in the Attic’. To ruminate this discussion, it will consider the critical essays of Robert B Hellman, Gilbert & Gumar, and Mary Poovey.
Charlotte Bronte’s Jane Eyre emerges with a unique voice in the Victorian period for the work posits itself as a sentimental novel; however, it deliberately becomes unable to fulfill the genre, and then, it creates an altogether divergent novel that demonstrates its superiority by adding depth of structure in narration and character portrayal. Joan D. Peters’ essay, Finding a Voice: Towards a Woman’s Discourse of Dialogue in the Narration of Jane Eyre positions Gerard Genette’s theory of convergence, which is that the movement of the fiction towards a confluence of protagonist and narrator, is limited as the argument does not fully flesh out the parodies that Charlotte Bronte incorporates into her work. I will argue that in the novel