The Trial of the Sensational Oscar Wilde
Ed Cohen's Talk on the Wilde Side discusses the trial of Oscar Wilde in 1895. Cohen explores the lack of legal transcripts of the case which relies on newspaper press reports and accounts to document this lawsuit. His investigations into the clarity of the newspaper accounts found that they "were themselves highly mediated stories whose narrative structures organized and gave meaningful shapes to the events they purported to accurately represent" (4). In the second part of his book, Cohen discusses Oscar Wilde's trial and its importance, the results of the fictionalized newspaper accounts of the proceedings, as well as the role of Wilde's The Picture of Dorian Gray in the legal
…show more content…
This characterized Wilde as the epitome of effeminacy. He is also described as disrespectful of the law and its proceedings. On the other hand, the Marquis of Queensberry is depicted as the model of masculinity as well as "a profligate and a degenerate aristocrat" (138). These characterizations did wonders for the Marquis's defense.
The newspapers suffered a setback that they actually ended up using to their benefit. The word "sodomy," although used in the courtroom, was deemed "unrespectable" and could not appear in the newspapers that told of the legal proceedings. The newspapers proceeded to describe the allegation in creative ways that actually incriminated Wilde. "They negatively characterized Wilde's behavior as 'immoral,' 'immodest,' 'unnatural,' 'improper,' 'indecent,' 'unrespectable,' 'disreputable,' etc., in order to avoid having to specify positively the actual sexual acts named in Queensberry's defense" (144). These negative terms helped characterize Wilde as a bad man and as a criminal. The papers also named the crime in "acceptable" ways calling it "the gravest of all offenses" (148). This "news" helped portray Wilde not only as a deviant, but as the guilty party in the case. The newspapers not only helped start this trial inadvertently through the Scots Observer article, but helped paint Oscar Wilde as the criminal and the Marquis of
Hawthorne conveys a speculative, yet suspicious tone as he questions the morality of Judge Pyncheon’s actions. The author tells the reader of the “splendid rubbish in [Judge Pyncheon’s] life” that covers up his secrets. The term “splendid rubbish” paints the reader a picture of rubbish that has been masked to look a certain way, but eventually the true nature of the
Wilde uses satire especially with the idea of marriage. In the society that he lived in, marriage is seen as a business arrangement. When Lady Bracknell questioned Jack to determine if he is suitable for her daughter, she
Human beings possess several virtues that differentiate them from other creatures and can use them in ways that represent their perceptions of social order. Surprisingly, Oscar Wilde believes that disobedience is an original virtue of every human and that it is responsible for progress and development. While Wilde’s claim is not entirely accurate, it is largely valid as evidenced by the recent events across the world, including the US, that have led to positive outcomes in spite of being termed and perceived as acts of disobedience.
A vivid selection of detail provides perfect evidence to Judge Pyncheon’s unsightly hypocrisy. Hawthorne pays close attention to Pyncheon’s work life, social world, and conspicuous appearances. At the same time, he elaborates on his wonderful involvement, his pursuing work ethic, and his superb manner and attire towards others. However, it is not the superficial attributes that Hawthorne pays attention to… it is the subliminal side of the Judge that he disregards. What does Judge Pyncheon do in his leisure time when the public eye is not trampling in his world? The Judge’s “splendid rubbish” is only a mere reflection he wants society to witness. Because of the narrator’s selection of detail, Judge Pyncheon’s secret existence soars to the surface.
Oscar Wilde’s play entitled “The Importance of Being Earnest” illustrates the concept of dual personality, fantasy, love, and lies. Jack, Algernon, Gwendolyn, and Cecily all live in lies. They are manipulated by their fantasies and desire for perfect relationship and love. Jack, the protagonist in the play, is the root of lies because of his imaginary brother named Earnest. Algernon uses the name to win Cecily, while Gwendolyn and Cecily are both fascinated by this name because it expresses strength and perfection of manhood. Due to their search and desire to have Earnest, the male and female characters escape from the reality. Therefore, Wilde in The Importance of Being Earnest portrays a gender doubled
“England is bad enough I know, and English society is all wrong” (Wilde, 145). The Picture of Dorian Gray and The Importance of Being Ernest are both ingenious literary works by the witty Oscar Wilde. The lead roles Dorian Gray and Jack Worthing are the perfect examples of how the Victorian society was phony. Although one is tragic and the other comedic both works by Oscar Wilde offer a social comment on the hypocrisy of the Victorian Era. Through the protagonist’s superficiality, deception and consequence of living a double life such comments are presented. While their superficiality and ability to deceive people are quite similar their consequences for their actions differ a great deal.
"I do not think that one person influences another, nor do I think there is any bad influence in the world," Oscar Wilde uttered when under trial (Hyde 353). Although this statement may be true, one of Wilde's most famous works shows a great deal of the effects of people shaping one another, causing one to wonder about Wilde's sincerity in that statement. The Picture of Dorian Gray shows variations on the existence and purposes of influence, displaying two types of personal influence: obvious manipulations such as that of Lord Henry upon Dorian and that of Dorian over Sybil Vane, and those that are more often overlooked such as the more subtle manipulation of Dorian over
was not only meant for the imagination, but for the moral mind as well. In
Write an essay that argues your position on the extent to which Wilde’s claims are valid.
Wilde’s lifestyle may have caused him to be snubbed in certain social situations. It maybe that he drew on his own experiences to create the atmosphere of scandal in the last chapters, even though, other than murder, the protagonist’s “sins” are never named and only briefly alluded to.
This play criticizes marriages in Victorian society and the aristocratic norm that marriage is more of a business than for love or happiness. Through these characters Wilde is not only commenting on the nature of love and marriage, but the place marriage holds in society. During this time in Victorian society and throughout history, many women married for financial security and social standing. It was only through their husbands that woman could hope continue living in the lifestyle to which they were privileged to gain political power. Lady Bracknell’s marriage was one of the marriages that was clearly for business and not for love. Wilde shows how Lady Bracknell has no emotions for Lord Bracknell; she doesn’t even really care about him but only uses him to increase her own social standing. Similarly, Lady Bracknell also does the same when she tries to “arrange” for an eligible suitor for her daughter Gwendolyn, not considering whether Gwendolyn loves the man or not. He must be in the same social standing as they are and must also belong to an aristocratic family. Lady Bracknell tells Jack, “You can hardly imagine that I and Lord Bracknell would dream of allowing our only daughter – a girl brought up with the utmost care – to marry into a cloak-room, and form an alliance with a parcel?” Although Jack is rich, he doesn’t have that name and social standing that Lady Bracknell wants rather she is dissatisfied when she finds out that he was found at a train station inside “a handbag!’’ Jack being found inside a handbag suggests that he was an abandoned baby out of illegitimacy which carried a huge social stigma in the Victorian era. Such babies were often delivered in secret and abandoned in a public place, like train stations as Jack’s situation perfectly
I call that business,”(Wilde, 15). As for Lady Bracknell, she becomes a contradiction claiming, “...when I was married to Lord Bracknell I had no fortune of any kind,” (Wilde, 64), yet she proposes an immense inquisition towards Jack regarding her wanting Gwendolen to marry rich. Wilde’s diverse usage of character's moralities in the play allots for the depiction of Victorian conversation, behavior, and responsibility. Oscar Wilde’s masterful use of allusion, the neologism of the word “Bunbury” and the mockery of Victorian society establish the theme of duality embedded throughout the play, The Importance of Being Ernest.
Cecily and Gwendolen were perfectly happy to become attached to something that appears to be true and real rather than taking a closer look to expose the genuine nature of Jack and Algernon proves that the two young women were more attached to the name of both men, and did not consider their actions and words to verify them not being earnest – exposing both women as superficial. Algernon’s occupation with his outer appearance and Lady Bracknell’s need to look good in the eyes of others proves them both to be superficially committed to their external manifestations. It is possible that Wilde was revealing what the upper class life resulted in, and that as one rises higher in status one loses themselves, becoming preoccupied with what others want and what others think, forgetting one’s true
While those of the Victorian upper class were usually the most refined and intelligent, Wilde portrays them as ignorant and dense. One of the most well described ladies, Miss Prism, is shown to be the least aware. “The most cultivated of ladies, and the very picture of respectability”(63). She is ultimately the most absent minded and leaves baby Jack in a handbag in a cloak room of a major railway station. Through Miss Prism, Wilde is able to propagandize the intelligence the aristocrats usually embody. In addition to this, Wilde refutes the morality of the Victorian elite. The main two characters, Jack and Algernon, are deceptive and are rarely seen to have any morals. Reviewing this play with a sociological/Marxist perspective provides insight on how Wilde wants others to perceive the elite of
Wilde uses a deceptively flippant tone and irony to criticize the hypocrisy of the upper class in Victorian society in relation to living an earnest life. Earnestness as a virtue was of paramount importance during Victorian Society, with people constantly striving to live an earnest life, that is, a life of honesty and seriousness in intention and purpose. The Victorian society was passionately obsessed with the ideals of earnestness, that individuals in the upper middle class were pressured to go to any lengths to lead such a life, even if it meant a difference between what they said, how they acted in public and what they honestly thought. "My dear fellow, the truth isn't quite the sort of thing