Huntington was born in 1927 in New York, N.Y. and his educational and academic career proceeded on the fast lane: graduated from Yale College with 18; served briefly in the US Army; earned his master-degree at University of Chicago in 1948: and finally, received his Ph.D. at Harvard University and started teaching Science of Government there in 1950. Consequently, he spent most of his academic career at this university. He wrote, co-wrote or edited 17 books and numerous articles on domestic and foreign affairs until his death in 2008. Besides his academic career he acted as advisor for a presidential candidate and served as advisor to the National Security Council in the 1970s.
He wrote his book in the historical context of the end-1940s and 1950s of the United States: the Cold War and the policy of containing communism, the Korean War with the conflict between President Truman and General MacArthur and the rise of a liberal society. Furthermore, the US armed forces did not went through a major downsizing after the Second World War, what
…show more content…
Conclusively, his theory would also be applicable in Western Democracy’s. The author’s main thesis is that only a professionalized officer corps can allow an effective civilian control. Thereby he differentiates between “objective and subjective civilian control.” Objective civilian control recognizes an autonomous military professionalism that would ensure the national defense.” On the other hand, subjective civilian control would allow a military participation in the political
The novel, Lord of the Flies, was written during the Cold War (1947- 1991), an era of communist containment after the close of World War II (1939-1945). During this time, the United States and the USSR (Union of Soviet Socialist Republics) were the world’s primary power holders. For a short time after WWII, the United States and the USSR were tenuously allied; however, they soon broke this alliance with their realization of their differences, mainly how their post-war plans contradicted. Additionally, Communist USSR and Capitalist United States felt threatened by each other. The USSR wanted to demilitarize Germany, while the United States strived for peace; comparatively, the politics in the Lord of the Flies epitomize world politics at the
The United States after the cold war was (“an era that ended when the Soviet Union collapsed on Dec. 31, 1991”.) The confrontation between the United States and the Soviet Union defined the Cold War period. (The collapse of Europe framed that confrontation). After World War II, the Soviet and American armies kept Europe busy. The post cold war had two phases that happen two years apart. The first one was from Dec 31, 1991. The second phrase lasted until September 11, 2001 (9/11) and until now. The initial phase of the post-Cold War world was built on two assumptions. (“The first assumption was that the United States was the dominant political and military power but that such power was less significant than before, since economics was the new focus. The second phase still revolved around the three Great Powers — the United States, China and Europe — but involved a major shift in the worldview of the United States, which then assumed that pre-eminence included the power to reshape the Islamic world through military action while China and Europe single-mindedly focused on economic matters.”) After the Cold War, the United States was withdrawing from Afghanistan and having a second thought on the relationship between global preminence and global omnipotence. Things that happen in 1991 will never be the same again. The Gulf War was an international conflict that was caused by Iraq’s invasion by Kuwait on Aug 2, 1990. A response from the U.S was that the United States and its
George C. Daughan’s studied at Harvard University where he received a Ph.D. in American History and Government. After graduating Harvard he went on to spend multiple years in the Air Force during the Vietnam War. After honorably serving his country, Mr.Daughan’s went on to teach at many universities across the United
Research this week was fruitful and my bibliography grew substantially. A large part of the reason for this growth was the mining of the bibliography of other sources. One of the most fruitful was, The Cold War in a Cold Land: Fighting Communism on the Northern Plains. The book provided me with a variety of both primary and secondary sources. The list of sources includes, books, articles, and government reports. A second book that provided more sources was, How We Forgot the Cold War. The bibliography provided some sources created by the North Dakota State Historical Society. In addition to these sources, I have been looking into newspapers. I have ordered some rolls of microfilm of the Griggs County Sentinel-Courier and am still waiting for them to arrive. I started with these rolls because they came from the paper closest to the geographic center of my research, as well as the dates of my research. In addition to the rolls, I have ordered The Cold War in a Cold Land, which provided a list of other newspapers that may be useful. In addition to ordering more microfilm reels that I will have sent to me at school, I will also have the opportunity to examine many more when I return home for spring break. Many are housed at the State Historical Society, just twenty minutes
After World War II there was still a main conflict between the two major world superpowers; the US and allied countries that supported democracy and on the other hand the Soviet Union (USSR) who supported communism and wanted to spread it. The conflict was that the Soviet Union tried spreading communism in other countries, but the United States was not going to allow that. This conflict influenced the Cold War to be fought by the Eastern Bloc (Soviet Union) and Western Bloc (the United States and allies). When the Eastern Europe was taken over by the USSR and turned into communism the US helped the Western Europe to not be taken over by communism. As an adviser to the President of the United States the policy that he should follow is to rapidly build up the political,
Europe after the capitulation of Nazi Germany and the subsequent Allied victory in World War II was in ruins from years of fighting and bombing. Cities and infrastructure lay flattened and shortages of vital consumer products of food and fuel persisted across Europe. The economic situation of Europe was also in tatters; many countries suffered from severe inflation, debt, trade deficits, and depleted gold supplies. The United States having remained virtually untouched by the destruction had emerged from World War II stronger than ever before both an industrial economic, and military powerhouse. The Soviet Union though also suffering from the wounds of the war began to establish pro-Soviet communist governments in the Eastern European countries
In 1961 President John F Kennedy put together a doctrine, which altered from President Eisenhower’s one. It was to “Respond flexibly to communist expansion, especially guerrilla warfare.” (Roskin & Berry, 2010, p. 58) It was a time when the Cold War was at its height and nuclear weapons a mass threat and source of power. This doctrine was aimed at using alternative means before opening into combat. This, in light of the Cuban Missile Crisis in 1962, it succeeded in doing.
Even though the United States and Soviet Russia have faced nuclear crisis several times, they have finally compromised that they would end the Cold War. The President of the United State, Donald Reagan and Soviet Russia Leader Mikhail Gorbachev declared that the US and Soviet Russia is old friend and the Cold War was ended.
All through the Cold War the United States attempted to contain or squash developments that it saw as dangers to American financial or security objectives, in Europe, in Asia, in different parts of the alleged Third World, and at home. Communists, patriots, individual voyagers, neutralists, and activists for popular government and human rights, at different times, felt American rage in the half-century after 1945. In no spot, be that as it may, did American exertions to attest its hobbies and impede the will of the local populace happen as seriously or shockingly as in Vietnam. Despite the fact that a little, immature nation which has been subjected to violence and resistance through the years, not to
He acknowledges that the circumstances of WWII and the rise of communism was necessary for the US to invest in its defense, and as a result the US established a “permanent armament industry.”
After World War II, the United Nation was established; however, there were many different perspectives among its permanent members: China, Russian, US, Britain, and France. Each country had different ways to maintain their influences over the world. During the cold war, many countries were established by using the violence to gain the power. During the Vietnam War, the Vietcong organization under support of Soviets Union and North Vietnam continued use terror as the tool to attack South Vietnam government and fear the people lived within. To gain more power and more influences to other half of the world, Soviet Union and its allies such as Syria, Libya secretly supported the terror group and used them as a political tool to break down the Western countries. The terror groups such as PFLP and the PLO usually targeted to citizen of Israel, and US allies. The attack during the Olympic 1972 became most effective for terrorists when Israel had to free fifty prisoners to exchange hostages. Although the ending of tension and completion between the Soviet Union and the United States led to the termination of the Soviet Union, and many of the terrorist of groups based in the United States and Western Europe began wither after Communism fell, terrorism did still survive. In order to maintain and stay alive, terrorism needs to have a sponsor. The state sponsors of terrorism are between Iran, Syria, and their sponsorship group Hezbollah. The states and organizations of the United
The role of America at the end of World War II was where the origins of policing the world originate. America had been engaged in a very costly war in terms of dollars as well as lives. But, despite the expense the United States came out of World War II better than any other nation that was involved. The Second World War was a battle between the Allied and Axis Powers. The Allied Powers consisted of the United States, Great Britain, the Soviet Union, China, and France. This war was seen as the fight against Nazi Germany, and therefore resulted in a majority of the battles fought on German and Russian soil. The aftermath left the Soviet Union in bad shape. Close to twenty million Russians
The challenge is how to keep the military in check and subservient to the political authority of a democratically oriented form of government, given the fact that the military possesses the ultimate power of force and coercion. The focus of a democratic form of society is that the citizens exercise direct participation in the government. The populace utilizes elections to select people to serve as their representative. The citizenry must stay cognizant of world affairs, the implications of military intervention, the cost of the sacrifice in comparison to the projected result, and make their elected officials aware of their position. The rule of law must govern this process, and the general population must concur there is a fair method for conducting said elections. The people must believe that the elected officials will in turn utilize the military forces in a disciplined manner, with concern for the greater good of the nation.
The Huntington Essay is a piece that was written in 1993, and was written to hypothesize a world order that was to come with the end of the Cold War. Before this time, many of the problems in society had to do with ideologies or political disputes, such as democracy against communism. In the Huntington Essay, the main point/argument that he is trying to portray is that the biggest differences between people in the world are no longer ideological, political, or geographical, but are now cultural instead. Huntington went on from there to give a very well structured argument, that was organized into 5 main parts: A World of Civilizations, The Shifting Balance of Civilizations, The Emerging Order of Civilizations, The Clash of Civilizations, and the Future of Civilizations.
A military regime, alongside monarchical, personalist and single party regimes, is a classification of an authoritarian regime. The regime is organised by a group of officers who decider a ruling mechanism and exercise some influence on governmental policy (Geddes, 1999, p.125). Authoritarian regimes arise through the eradication of an elected government and the majority party, through a coup or a military intervention. Survival of authoritarian regimes has become increasingly more difficult because of a developing democratic world which has now reached the ‘third wave of democratization’ (Huntington, 1991). All types of regime are vulnerable to collapse but the military regime is especially vulnerable as the institutional costs often counterbalance the benefits (Nordlinger, 1977). Thus, the longevity of a military regime is far shorter than that of either personalist or one-party regimes. The reasons as to why military regimes struggle to survive for lengthy periods of time can be explained through; the corporate interest of the regime, the benefits obtained from the regime during power or implementation, the vulnerability of the regime during power and the consequences that would emerge if the regime dissolved.