Gun control is a big debate and if the United States should keep the Second Amendment. With all the recent crime a lot of the Democratic candidates want to take away gun rights away. The Second Amendment was created in the year of 1791. (shmoop.com). Many changes in history were about if The United States Should keep this right or not. Several of the states wanted to take this right away because of the violence, but if they do take this away, it will not stop the amount of violence in the world because there are many other deadly weapons that people can use. Citizens of the United States believe that the United States the right to own and buy weapons away because of the amount of crime that happens each year with with a person using a firearm …show more content…
There have been many times where people in stores, at house and even in the streets have done self protection with the usage of guns. 9 out of 10 times a criminal is going to flee the place if he or she notices that person with a gun. A victim of rape, Kimberly Corban, ask Obama in a press conference of how she is suppose to protect herself and her children if another accident happens. Another example of how owning firearms are a key part of self protection is how they can can scare people off that put you in danger. A man from Texas, James Gerow, woke up hearing an intruder in his house. He quickly walked out of his room noticing a man wearing a dark hoodie how shouldnt have been in his house. James grabbed his gun and chased the man outside where the cops have arrived and took the criminal to the nearest prison available. Therefore, many people use guns to protect themselves. James used the gun for self protection and he did not shoot at the intruder. This means if the usage of guns is taken away from the people that live in the United States how are they suppose to protect …show more content…
The reason why the school shooting problem is a load of crap with the people that own guns is because the people who make these horrible choices have mental problems and could not get the correct help that they needed. Out of a recent survey from propublica.org 61.5% of the school shooters have a substance abuse problem. 43.5 % of the shooters were victims of bullying. This concludes that many of the people that decided to do these horrible things like school shooting have had problems in the past that affected them mentally, and if they chose taking innocent students lives as a solution, they had a mental problem and did not get the correct help. Not every homeowner that has a gun in their house is going to go shoot up a school. Its also true that the police need guns to protect themselves. Police using these guns are using them as self protection. They do not just do a drive by on people or kill anyone without a reason. They are here to protect the people and the town so they need weapons on them to be able to protect every
Click here to unlock this and over one million essaysGet Access
Gun control has been undoubtedly one of the most heated public policies in the history of our nation. The Second Amendment states that as citizens we have the right to bear arms, which is why gun control is such a heated issue. Gun control has become a huge issue on the national, state, and local scales in the United States and I do not see it improving anytime soon.
Imagine being in the family’s shoes when hearing through media reports that their child was killed in a school shooting. If teachers had the option of being equipped with the handguns, then that child (and the rest in the classroom) would have survived. How many more times are we going to learn about a deranged gunman walking into a school loaded and ready to kill? How many more innocent children need to die before we wake up and give our teachers the prospect to fight back? The only resolution is to grant our teachers a fighting chance. No shooter is going to target a school that can protect itself and fight back. Every second counts in a school shooting. Calling 911 and anticipating for police to arrive isn’t good enough. Spartanburg County South Carolina Sheriff Chuck Wright says, “Our form of justice is not making it. Carry a concealed weapon. That’ll fix it” (Miller, Fox News). Then there was Milwaukee County Sheriff David Clarke Jr. who lately created a nationwide uproar for advising citizens to master how to manage firearms so they can protect themselves, because he says, “simply calling 911 and waiting is no longer your best option” (Handelman Fox 6 Wisconsin). What happens when the nearest police unit is 10
One of the most common reasons people give for wanting to get rid of guns is public shootings, particularly school shootings (Quinn). It truly is tragic that people would take a weapon into an area to shoot innocent bystanders for no reason. However getting rid of guns is not the solution. Even if we get rid of guns those who
The situation of gun control has been an issue for many years. The Second Amendment states that we as citizens have the right to bear arms and to protect ourselves. When the Constitution was first made the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution is the heart of the issue of gun control. It also states "A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed". The states declared that the Amendment was only created to allow the government to bear arms. The way it reads though is that it grants the rights of all people to bear arms. There have been cases brought before the Supreme Court that has fought the right to bear arms and used the amendment to protect their rights. The government does not have the right to take away the guns from the people but is able to control the manufacturing, sales, and possessions of guns.
Gun control in the United States has been a controversial issue for some time now. So much so that the Supreme Court even refuses to address this issue directly. Gun control really boils down to the the Second Amendment of the Constitution. Many people have different interpretations of the Second Amendment and the trenches are dug in deep on this issue. The Second Amendment can not provide the right to bear all types of arms to protect the people from governmental tyranny. If the Second Amendment was absolute, then we would allow the public to possess nuclear weapons, missiles, and other such arms, because like the 9 mm handgun that is an arm, a nuclear warhead is also a type of arm. The more our government restricts our rights to own
The Second Amendment was adopted in 1791 but over the years it is not suitable for the modern society. Big things have changed over the years since the Constitution was written, consequently, its contents do not reflect the necessary changes for the benefit of all citizens. Violence is out of control and many people are killed by guns each year. The second amendment needs to be changed because we need to ban guns and make our society safer.
In the Constitution, the second amendment gives the American people to have the right to possess and bear arms. This amendment has been the most controversial issue since guns have been around. Issues such as gun control and gun ownership have remained a matter of debate and have been floating around in Congress. It has been rumored that Congress is forced to draft certain legislation in order to come up with a law against unlawful use of arms, and only owning them for safety purposes. When it comes to congress, Republicans and Democrats have debated their views on gun-control in the United States to best fit the overall well-being of the citizens. These different points of views have caused many discussions on how this controversial topic should be handled and whether or not it conflicts with the second amendment. Throughout this topic, Republicans and hardcore NRA supporters favor with less strict rules of gun-control while Democrats want stricter rules such as a background check for every citizen that poses a threat to either the United States of America or the average citizen. The debate on guns in America has essentially become one more distracting, off-point topic in culture wars.
As mentioned, the Second Amendment includes more leeway to some than others. If it is said that there can be plenty of interpretation to the Second Amendment, then what do pro-gun control individuals believe? The Second Amendment vows to provide security to Americans. Although, pro-gun control individuals argue that the required security during the 18th century is not the same caliber of security we need today. During the time the Second Amendment was written, the country just finished fighting a war. With the power and abilities that our present day military has, it is argued that we do not necessarily need the protection of guns to the same extent (CNN). The Framers of the Second Amendment “offered some lofty generalities and then left the
The second amendment is the law that states that all americans have the right to own and carry a weapon. A law which is being discussed a lot in the media, especially after the tragic school shooting events and so on. In the US it is a "human right" being able/allowed to own and carry a weapon. The second amendment was written with a motive stating that weapons should be used as protection under the Civil War, and to make smaller armies based on the individual's own weapons. That way the military wouldn"t have to distribute weapons to the people because many already had their own. George Washington disagreed and he said it was "crazy" to have an army based on voluntary persons with their own weapons. He also said that the only solution would
citizens as well as those in a militia. The late Supreme Court Justice, Justice Scalia believed it
I don’t think there is a fix to this firearm issue. There are too many people that own firearms, and there is no way they are going to let that Amendment be changed. Even if the Second Amendment is removed from the Constitution, there are already too many guns out there. I will really like to know what the government is going to do about this. There guns murders and mass shutting keep increasing, and thing are getting out of hand. People are not going to have their guns taken away from them, and I understand that. They paid for those guns, and guns are not cheap. I don’t own a gun right now, but I’m sure I’ll probably buy one in the future. Knowing that there are so many people that own them, makes me feel in disadvantage. Probably many others
We need to keep the second amendment the same and not change one thing to it. If we didn’t have the guns then we can’t defend ourselves. People want to change the amendment to where we can’t buy guns as easy, and they want to try changing it to where we got to have license to own one. If we keep the amendment the same then we can protect ourselves from any danger: “The first is that the amendment was meant to ensure that individuals have the absolute right to own firearms” (Mount, 2011). This means that we should have it to where we have the right to own guns and to keep it easier to buying and shooting them. Another reason, the military has guns, and they need them to fight: “The second is that the amendment was meant to ensure that States
Our Second Amendment is near extinction because of a variety of different things.whether it be school shootings or just shootings in general. If you are a liberal you might be offended by this essay because i'm pro Second Amendment. There are many reasons for me to be pro Second Amendment.Like…
Gun control is one of the most talked about topics in modern day America. 43 of 50 states have the right to bear arms. Most states have to background check you in order for you to purchase or sell guns. Some other states prevent carrying guns and some other ban assault rifle weapons. People who support the gun laws say that the second amendment was meant for militias and that gun restrictions have always existed. People who oppose that say that guns are needed for self-defense from people who invade houses or are actual threats. Although both of those are correct, there will always be two sides for control laws.
Furthermore, according to Gunowners.org, Gary Kleck’s book, who is a professor in the school of criminology and criminal justice at Florida State University in Tallahassee, implies that guns are used 2.5 million times a year in self defense, which means that each year firearms are used more than 80 times more often to protect the lives of honest citizens than to take lives.” Gunowners.org also adds, as reported by the National Safety Council, “Of the 2.5 million times citizens use their guns to defend themselves every year, the overwhelming majority merely brandish their gun or fire a warning shot to scare off their attackers. Less than 8% of the time, a citizen will kill or wound his/her attacker.” This proves how citizens are more likely to use guns in case of self defense, and if the gun is needed it is most often used just to scare the criminal away. When debating if concealed-carry should be allowed, it should be considered that law-abiding citizens know how to use guns with common sense. In the final analysis, even if it is proclaimed that if one allows guns in certain places it will end up with guns in the hands of criminals, it is quite easy to see people have been given the right to possess guns, therefore one may use it in case of an