Compare And Contrast Bath's Tale And Le Morte D Arthur

The Middle Ages, a time of strict societal rules and hierarchy, was dominated by the Church. Eileen Power, a medievalist, states that "The ideas about women were formed on the one hand by the clergy order...while strictly subordinating them to the interests of its primary asset, the land." The Medieval Age's idea of a women's role was largely determined by males, specifically that of the Church. The Church's authority over women restricted them from their inborn rights of freedom and equality. Chaucer, a firm believer against this inequality, utilizes the Wife of Bath's prologue and tale to suggest that true happiness can only be achieved when male sovereignty over women is relinquished.

The wife of baths Yale by Geoffrey Chaucer depicts the secret life of a "well educated" widow and her desire to lust and love with many and all men to her likings . The second tail is from a Morte D' Arthur, by Thomas Malory. In this story Arthurs wife Queen Guinevere also shares lustrous characteristics as the wife of bath. Both these ladies share an acquired taste for forbidden love that is not socially acceptable. During the times of knights and crusades, adultery and unfaithfulness wasn't committed like now or even performed, because no law was higher than the church and such actions were a sin. The actions of the secondary characters to the main characters creates conflict cause by these women's actions which these stories compose of the secret love between and sir Lancelot, and the wife's pursuit of pleasure. In the wife of baths

The Canterbury Tales depict many characters that, although fictionally created by Geoffrey Chaucer, may give the reader the opportunity to analyze and interpret their tales as a way of determining their personalities. The Wife of Bath and her prologue accurately supports this statement, as her intentions become expounded due to her questionable actions. The Wife of Bath exhibits in her prologue that she lacks respect and gratitude towards the men she beguiles into marriage and does so by falsely claiming direction from God. She shows not only deceit towards her many husbands, but also does not possess the ability to care about others before herself.

The contrast of the two stories, The Knight’s tale, and the Wife of Bath’s Tale, by Geoffrey Chauser, is by the chivalric romances, which have the elements of, based from our previous discussion, wise and just leader, an unattainable woman, a monster / dragon / mythological creature, involvement of destiny, fate, chance, and god, and many more elements that were discussed. The Wife of bath’s tale is a chivalric romance because, first it has the element of a wise and just leader, like the queen, because a queen can also lead a country, just like the Queens of England, Victoria, Mary and the Elizabeths, but the society on medieval times look into women just as a product to be used, because this was stated in the first few parts of the story,

Chaucer’s “Wife of Bath Prologue and Tale” focus on the story telling of a woman who has experienced her fair share of marital issues. She is depicted as a promiscuous woman, married five times and had plenty of male suitors, the Wife was not like any other woman during this era. Although her reputation was how most perceived her, she was not a fan of being scrutinized for what she considered as her duty as a woman; to not remain single. This is seen through the depiction of women in society, how marriage ought to be in the eyes of religion, and how men were to view a woman like her. The language that is used throughout Chaucer’s prologue and tale allude to the evolution of women as well as how they struggled to gain any recognition in

In Geoffrey Chaucer’s Canterbury Tales, he introduces a character known as the Wife of Bath. It is her turn to tell the stories, and her tale begins discussing her past marriages in the prologue. Married five times, the Wife of Bath tells us about her own marital issues, and the way she was able to manipulate the gender roles to her own advantage. As interesting of a character as she is, I find Chaucer created the Wife of Bath to deliberately introduce the issues gender roles play in our society. I believe that the role the of the Wife of Bath in the tale was purposely written by Chaucer to twist the traditional gender roles of the time, satirizing how gender plays in society.

that he never went to hell (272). She clearly valued sex as the most important attribute of a husband for, “…in our bed he was so fresh and gay….Heaven knows whenever he wanted it- my belle chose-, thought he had beaten me in every bone…”(272) Even though her final husband had beaten her, because he was good in bed with her she felt she loved him the best of them all (272). Clearly, The Wife of Bath valued three things in her marriages, sex, power, and money. In her tale we find that power is an important role to women in marriage. A knight, after raping a women is spared by a queen (282) but in order to save his life, he has one year (283) to find, “What is the thing that women most desire”(282)? After searching, he finds no answer but on his way home finds an old women who promises she will save him, he must promise to do what she asks of him after however, and he agrees (285). When he and the old lady meet with the queen, he exclaimed, “A women want’s the self-sovereignty over her husband as over her lover, and master him; he must not be above her” (286). This answer is perfectly inline with The Wife of Baths views, she always wants to be more powerful than her husband. When the old lady says he must marry her, he protests but soon she offers him two choices, he can have her be old and ugly till she dies, but loyal, or she can be young and pretty and take chance that she might not remain faithful (291). He gives his answer to be that she may choose, thus giving her the

Lastly, in The Wife of Bath’s Tale/Prologue, the gender issues are addressed through satire. The Wife of Bath is an experienced and very independent woman, which at the time, was rare to come by. Brewer backs up my statement by saying, “The Wife is an independent, middle-aged, pleasure-loving weaver from Bath. A major character in the Canterbury Tales, she is a rich, complex woman.” (Brewer, W, Gwen). Furthermore, throughout her prologue, she basically states that marriage sucks, but she keeps getting married. This is another thing that Chaucer arises through this tale is the fact that during the 1300’s woman didn’t have any power, they were not equal to men. Chaucer’s opinion is that women are just as smart as men, and he expresses this opinion through satire. During the prologue, Wife of Bath presents what women want: compliments, parties, and presents. In the tale, a queen requires a knight to even answer this question for which he answers, “Some say the things we most desire are these: / Freedom to do exactly as we please.” (Wife of Bath Tale, Pg. 141, 81-82). Her first four husbands she married for money, the last one she

The wife continues on with details of her five marriages to say that she previously had three unfit husbands and two fit husbands. Focusing less time telling about the unfit, she simply focuses her tale to tell of how she believes one should go about marriage- much like a business transaction. “By accepting the reduction of female sexuality to an instrument of manipulation, control and punishment” the wife gets what she wants through withholding sex. (Aers 148). The wife’s character in The Wife of Bath ultimately argues for Chaucer’s skewed representation of love, sex and marriage as seen in the Canterbury Tales.

Geoffrey Chaucer’s “The Wife of Bath’s Tale” is an important part of his most famed work, The Canterbury Tales. One of the most respected highly analyzed of all of the tales, this particular one is important both for its character development and its prevailing themes. It seamlessly integrates ideas on society at that time with strong literary development. This work stands the test of time both because of its literary qualities and because of what it can teach us about the role of women in late Medieval society.

The Wife of Bath begins the prologue to her tale by boasting of her experience in marriage. She has married five men already, and ignores the idea that this is a reproach to Christian principles. She is merely adhering to the Christian principle of "be fruitful and multiply." She cites the case of King Solomon, who had multiple wives, and tells the group that she welcomes the opportunity for her sixth husband. She also points out that Jesus never lays down a law about virginity, and essentially states that we have the parts for sex and should use them as such. The Pardoner objects to the Wife of Bath's musings on marriage, but she decides to tell

The investigation into whether or not Geoffrey Chaucer was ahead of his time in terms of his views on feminism has been up for debate for hundreds of years. The Wife of Bath’s Prologue is just one solitary

In The Canterbury tales, Chaucer uses The Wife of Bath as a representation of what it was like for Women in the Middle Ages to be striped of equality and bow to the otherwise male dominated society. For the representation of women Chaucer uses the Tales of “The Scholar”, “The Second Nun “The Reeve’s”, and “The Franklin” and many others in a very dry, pretentious manner to steer readers into the view of how a women of the Middle Ages should be as a so called “virtuous” wife or woman. The concept of marriage plays a major part in manifesting the idea of the issues of inferiority of women. The perception rendered as women having to be obedient and inferior figure to their husbands or male counter parts. Chaucer

Misogyny is not only visible in the Miller’s tale, but also in the Wife of Bath’s tale through the very superficial standards set for women by men. The old woman asks that the knight marries her in return for giving him the answer to the riddle and he reacts in disgust and horror, “‘...to take me as your wife…‘Alas and woe is me!...I am ugly and poor…my damnation! Alas, that any of my birth should ever be so foully disgraced!” (Chaucer, “The Wife of Bath’s Tale,” 199-213). The knight is visibly distraught, using words such as “damnation” and “disgraced” when the old woman expresses her wish to marry him. He displays these emotions not because she wants to get married, but because she is ugly and poor. He is worried because an ugly wife will mar his reputation and is a poor reflection of him. This translates to the misogynistic society during the time period where women were seen as property to be shown off, rather than people who deserved respect. The recurring theme of misogyny in these two tales shows that Chaucer does not feel sympathy for the opposite gender, but instead belittles their plight.

In some cases, the women see marriage as an opportunity to gain money and control over her husband. The women in the novel mainly saw marriage as an income. The female characters typically had to conform to the typical requirements that came along with getting married, such as obedience, so we see a contrast to these standards in the Wife of Bath. Throughout this novel, it becomes apparent that the male characters value courtly love and social class, while the women desire dominance and money. We see a difference when Chaucer talks of the men compared to the women characters.