On June 30, 2015, AP closed an internal theft case at the Hudson’s Bay Anjou store for the value of $150. AP reviewed the CCTV and observed the maintenance associate concealing merchandise in the garbage. Live surveillance was conducted and the associate was observed to remove food from the packing and concealed it. The associate was interviewed and admitted to previous thefts of jewelry items and also some testers and food write offs. The associate was terminated from employment with Hbc and paid full restitution.
Dispatch advised me that Walmart loss prevention was currently observing a male subject attempting to pry open a necklace while in the jewelry department of the store. Loss prevention described the subject as a white male, wearing a green tee-shirt, and black baseball cap.
The shopkeeper’s privilege does not protect Walmart from liability under the circumstances of the case. Although Navarro had the right to exercise shopkeeper’s privilege, Navarro had not enough evidence to consider Cockrell as a suspect and it is not reasonable that Navarro asked Cockrell to take off the bandage. According to the merchant protection statutes, merchants can stop, detain, and investigate suspected shoplifters without being held liable for false imprisonment if (1) there are reasonable grounds for the suspicion, (2) suspects are detained for only reasonable time, and (3) investigations are conducted in a reasonable manner (Cheeseman, 2015, P.87). Navarro was not fulfilled for the third condition because the investigation is unreasonable on putting the suspect in a risk of death. Since there was a risk of bacterial infection and it may cause death after the wound area exposed under the air, Navarro should
In December of 1996, Debra McCann and her two children were out shopping at a local Wal-Mart. The family was there to exchange and return merchandise previously purchased. After checking out late in the evening, the family was stopped at the entrance of the Wal-Mart store by an associate who thought that one of the children had been caught shoplifting previously. They were told that the police had been called and were told that they were not allowed to leave the store. Instead of actually calling the police, the store’s security officer was called. Sure that this was a case of mistaken identity, Debra McCann offered to show her identification, but was refused by the
This case involves a male and female Hispanic, entering TJ Maxx during business hours, and concealing various items in their bags. The suspects attempted to leave the store without paying for the items. Loss Prevention Agent Sergio Castro made contact with the suspects at the front entrance and retrieved all of the loss except for a black Michael Kors purse, valued at $159.99.
On December 20th at approximately 5:30 p.m. A Hispanic male and a Caucasian male walked out of the Galloway ShopRite with carts full of unpaid merchandise. The Hispanic male took approximately $323.20 and the Caucasian male took about $409.18 of unpaid goods. Store managers went after them, and were able to recover $72.90 in merchandise. The remaining of the stolen merchandise could not be recovered. Management immediately contacted store Security personal, Victoria Winder, who call the police and took pictures of the license plate of the Toyota 4Runner the individuals took off in. The suspects were later identified as William Terpak Jr. and Jocsan Moradel-Flores using ShopRite’s video surveillance.
The Alison Peterson v. Grocery Depot Inc tort lawsuit is about an incident that occurs in countless grocery stores across the United States. Peterson is alleging Grocery Depot Inc. was negligent in their duty of care to her as a business visitor. Grocery Depot Inc. as a property owner has a legal duty to maintain the grocery store premises in a safe and hazard free condition or to warn a customer about any situation that could be dangerous. Peterson alleges Grocery Depot Inc breached this duty, which resulted in her slip and fall.
There is an ethical side to this story because there may be the possibility that the store associate or customer had lied and said that they stole something when they really had not. Sometimes if there is a conflict between two people one person might say something bad in order to get the other person into serious trouble. In a case like this then there would be some serious issues that come into play. The person that is accusing the wrongdoer would get into trouble for false accusations. Then again they may also be correct and that person may be guilty of stealing items in the store. It is helpful when there are cameras involved that can be reviewed so that there is more evidence to suggest whether or not a crime had been committed. It just goes to show that no matter what the situation is the police always need to look at both sides of the situation.
On 4/27/2018, I was conducting a business check of 8701 US 19 (Walmart) at which time I was approached by business loss prevention employee, Steven Uliano. Steven advised that a male subject identified as being Michael King was at a self-check out register and previously trespassed from this location.
Upon arrival, I spoke Asset Protection Business Partner, Matt Carroll, who advised me that an employee of Starbucks named Basil Bonney, loaded two Target Gift cards without rendering cash payment for them. Carroll stated that he was notified by Investigation Technician from Target located in North Brunswick that he had identified a cash theft. Carroll stated that his investigation revealed that Bonny loaded two target gift cards with account #041-216-702-120-083 and #041-216-490-244-319 with total value of $450.00. First card, account ending 083, had four separate transactions on June 19, 2017 at 0711 hours, same day at 1858 hours, June 20, 2017 at 1111 hours, and June 21, 2017 at 0704 hours total amount of $400.00 dollars. Second card, account ending 319 had one transaction on June 23, 2017 at 2117 hours with amount of $50.00 dollars.
Facts: On 06/02/17, APM Orlando revived CCTV footage to confirm this allegation. CCTV footage revealed that SFL Diaz along with CSA Hansen interacting with what appears to be suspected shoplifters in the middle of an aisle. further CCTV review indicated that SFL Diaz along with CSA Hansen searched the suspected shoplifter's bags in a middle of an aisle.
On 3/7/16 at 4:50 P.M, Shift Supervisor (S/S) Enmanuel Cabrera was notified by Security Officer (S/O) Zachery Smith, that Yard Jockey Sean Barchik found a box of Trident gum in the Truck Yard by Dock door 59. S/S Cabrera then went out to the Truck yard to take pictures and collect a witness statement. Upon arrival, S/S Cabrera was met Yard Jockey Sean Barchik, he explained that he found the box of gum while performing a Yard inspection. Upon discovery, the Yard Jockey immediately notified B Shack security of the merchandise that was found. Security will launch an investigation to see if we can discovery how the box of gum get there.
Upon arrival, contact was made by the Lost Prevention Officer, Mr. Kenneth Miller (Complainant), for Kohl’s. When contact was made, Mr. Miller advised he observed a white female, Ms. Donna Porter (Arrestee), enter the store and witnessed her place (concealed) several items in black dotted bag (Kohl’s shopping chart), entered the fitting room for a few minutes and approached the cashier at the west side entrance. Ms. Porter purchased a pair of shoes and then passed the point of sale (cash register) without attempting to purchase the items she concealed.
Based on J.C.Penney’s current situation, and the above issues, we recommend the following strategic models.
On December 14, 2015, AP closed an internal merchandise theft at the Bay Rockland store for a value of $3,711. Information was received that the licensee associate received a large no receipt return and the investigation revealed that several other similar refunds had been received by the same associate. It was also discovered that this associate worked at Anjou store. During live surveillance the associate was observed to take 3 pieces of merchandise into the fitting and later no merchandise came out but believed to be in her bag. Parcel check was completed by AP and the 3 items were found inside of her bag. The associate admitted to several thefts at the Anjou store plus these 3 items at Rockland.
The Senior Partner wants to know if a customer of Bell Department Stores (“Bell”) can establish a false imprisonment claim against Bell, the Firm’s client. The customer is a man named Richard Okon, age twenty-one (“the Customer”). Vince Von (“the Employee”) was the security guard on duty who detained the Customer on August 15, 2015 at the store located in Weatherford, Texas. Motivated by a preexisting aversion to Okon, Von watched him intently from the moment he entered the store. The Customer purchased running shoes and socks from a salesclerk. The Customer then browsed the sunglasses section, shopping bag in hand. The Employee continued watching him. The Customer took his own sunglasses off of his head and began trying on sunglasses. After trying a pair