Trifles By Susan Glaspell Essay

The character development of Mrs. Peters is driven by her sympathy for Mrs. Wright. At the beginning of “Trifles”, Mrs. Peters’ character is portrayed as anxious and insecure. The evidence the women find reveals that Mrs. Wright was trapped in a neglectful marriage. All of the insightful evidence influences Mrs. Peters to disregard her duties as Mr. Peters’ wife, and conceal the evidence from him. Despite Mrs. Peters original compliant and coy personality, the events throughout the play drive her to boldly protest submitting to the male

Trifles, Susan Glaspell’s play written in 1916, reveal concerns of women living in a male dominated society. Glaspell communicates the role that women were expected to play in late 19th century society and the harm that can come of it to women, as well as men. The feminist agenda of Trifles was made obvious, in order to portray the lives of all women who live oppressed under male domination. John and Minnie Wright are two main characters who are never seen; however provide the incident for the play. In this play women are against men, Minnie against her husband, Mrs. Hale and Mrs. Peters against their husband’s, as well as men in general.

The county attorney does not give a second thought about how John may have treated his wife. Instead, he’s focusing on Mr. Hale’s testimony regarding the alleged “scared” look on John’s face. The men’s bias is often and openly expressed to the women verbally. In accordance to the dialog of the play, the men show they don’t consider what women say vital or pertinent. The Sheriff fires back, identifying with his partners, “Well, can you beat the woman! Held for murder and worryin’ about her preserves.” (Glaspell 1412). The men agree in general about the sheriff’s remark. Mr. Hale comes along and says, “Well, women are used to worrying over trifles.” (Glaspell 1412). The dialog of the play demonstrates the obliviousness and general absence of appreciation given to women’s comments. Even the sheriff addresses his wife openly as if a woman’s role in the home was insignificant. The prejudice from the men is evident and once a reader or audience starts inquiring about how the men treat women, a pattern is seen regarding the men’s standards. The court attorney kicks his foot against the pots and pans below the sink in the wake of discovering no clean towels, telling the ladies “Not

One may ask How do all these things show that Mrs. Wright killed her husband? Well let me tell you. Mr. Wright got angry and ripped open the birdcage breaking the hinge then he grabbed the canary and in one swift motion breaking its neck, to calm down Mrs. Wright went and started sewing together her quilt not realizing all her frustration and rage was showing in her stitching. Then in the midst of her thinking she came up with the plan to kill Mr. Wright in the night strangling him like he strangled her canary and her soul. That is how the crazily sewn quilt patch, the unhinged birdcage,

While talking, the women find a fancy box belonging Mrs. Wright. Inside the box, is what they believe to be Mrs. Wright’s dead pet bird. They realize that “somebody – wrung – its – neck” (1172) Remembering a similar incident in her life, Mrs. Peters says, “When I was a girl – my kitten –there was a boy took a hatchet, and before my eyes, ..If they hadn’t held me back I would have hurt him.” (1172) They place the dead bird back in the box, and then, surprisingly, they hide the box. You can almost see what’s going on in the mind of these two women as they must be imagining poor Mrs. Wright, horrified that her awful husband killed her bird, then she must have snapped and strangled him to end her own suffering.

Therefore, Mrs. Wright murdered her husband simply because he murdered her pet bird, and she did so the same way he murdered the bird, making the motive is unethical. Mrs. Hale finds a dead bird with a broken neck inside of Mrs. Wright’s sewing box wrapped in a cloth. Obviously as lonely as Mrs. Wright was the death of her bird would have been catastrophic for her. This is evidence of a motive proving Mrs. Wright killed her husband out of sheer revenge of the death of her bird, it was the last thing he was ever going to take away from her. Along with the broken cage Mrs. Peters states, “Why, look at this door. It’s broke. One hinge is pulled apart” (8). Then Mrs. Hale comments, “Looks like someone must have been rough with it” (8). This is how it happened, Mr. Wright came home from work in

Susan Glaspell's play Trifles explores male-female relationships through the murder investigation of the character of Mr. Wright. It also talks about the stereotypes that women faced. The play takes place in Wright's country farmhouse as the men of the play, the county attorney, the sheriff, and Mr. Hale, search for evidence as to the identity and, most importantly, the motive of the murderer. The attorney, with the intensions of proving that Mrs. Wright choked the husband to death, was interviewing Mr. Hale on what he saw when he came in to the house. The women, on the other hand, were just there to get some clothing for the wife who was in jail for suspected murder of her husband. However, the clues which would lead them to the answer

The play ?Trifles?, by Susan Glaspell , is an examination of the different levels of early 1900?s mid-western farming society?s attitudes towards women and equality. The obvious theme in this story is men discounting women?s intelligence and their ability to play a man?s role, as detectives, in the story. A less apparent theme is the empathy the women in the plot find for each other. Looking at the play from this perspective we see a distinct set of characters, a plot, and a final act of sacrifice.

The story is the same, Mrs. Hale her neighbor and Mrs. Peter’s the sheriff’s wife decided Mrs. Wright’s fate while in the kitchen, they both decided not to turn in the evidence. They discovered the dead canary, they understood the meaning of the bread outside of the breadbox, and the uneven stitches in the cloth, Mrs. Wright had lost her joy the only thing that held her together was the bird. Mr. Wright robbed her of her joy, her freedom, when he killed the bird. Mr. Wright was stern and reclusive, putting Mrs. Wright in a lonesome place where she couldn’t be herself. The ladies hid the bird and after putting the pieces together they knew the dead bird would solve the question of the motive for Mrs. Wright’s murderous act. At the trial when the bird cage came up and what happened to the bird, Mrs. Hale says, “the cat must have got it” (578). The county attorney asked absently, “Is there a cat?” (578). Mrs. Hales says, “She liked the bird and was going to bury it in a pretty box” (579). She felt Mr. Wright had choked the life out of the bird, robbing Mrs. Wright of the last bit of joy, singing and

Mrs.Wright claims she was laying sound asleep, even as her husband lying next to her was being strangled to death by a rope. As you may conclude this story she has made up does not sound plausible due to the evidence against her. Now to find her motive for killing Mr.Wright. There are major clues throughout the text that help to find Mrs.Wright’s motive as evidenced by the mangled bird cage and the slaughtered canary.

     Next, Mrs. Peters finds a birdcage, and shortly after, Mrs. Hale finds the bird. There are many peculiar things about both of these items. First, the cage has a damaged door, which shows signs of forced entry. Now, Mrs. Wright is said to have loved the bird, and actually was heard to sing to herself more, after she bought the bird. So that leaves only John Wright to be the one who broke the cage. And, after the bird is found, we know why the cage was damaged. The bird, dead in the sewing box, is found strangled to death. Exactly the way that Mr. Wright died in his sleep. This is the single most important piece of evidence, yet both ladies decide to hide it from the detective.

The women empower themselves through silence, particularly in the kitchen communicating and reflecting upon things around them in the limited space they were given. The men dismiss the kitchen finding nothing that is relevant to the murder case. The men keep crisscrossing through the kitchen, ignoring and not realizing they could find the vital evidence through trivial details. Even though they were having difficulty in finding clues that lead to the murder. While the women were alone looking through Minnie’s kitchen they found the most valuable evidence the “missing piece to men’s puzzle” (Holstein 283). Mrs. Hale found the dead bird strangled in the sewing box telling “Mrs. Peters-look at it! Its neck! Look at its neck!” (782). Mrs. Hale and Mrs. Peters recognize the bird was strangled brutally “their eyes meet. A look of growing comprehension, of horror” (Glaspell 782). Both of them realized the bird was killed the same way as Mr. Wright with the rope around their neck. The strangled bird represents Minnie Foster how her freedom and joy was strangled to death. When the men came in the kitchen, the county attorney noticed the bird cage, wondering if the bird flew away, but Mrs. Hale lied and said “we think the- cat got it” ( Glaspell 782). The county attorney seek only visible evidence for murder he was wasn’t thinking critically what it may mean. Mrs. Hale and Mrs. Peters covered the evidence keeping it between themselves for their own knowledge. They

In Susan Glaspell’s one act play, “Trifles” the fine line between truth and justice can become blurred, when empathy is added into the perspective of the alleged crime. Although “Trifles” is a play about a homicide allegedly committed by a woman, two neighboring women conceal the evidence that could lead to the conviction and in doing so contradict the district attorney’s dismissive attitude of their gender’s intelligence and capabilities. Mrs. Mini Wright is rocking herself in a rocking chair, when she is confronted with her husband’s death by neighboring men, the sheriff and the district attorney arrive and the search for a motive begins, the motive they are looking for is to convict Mrs. Wright in the court of law. Life on the ranch is secluded

At the end of the story, Mrs. Hale and Mrs. Peter are in effects allowing Mrs. Wright to get away with murder out of guilt and pity. Both Mrs. Hale and Mrs. Peter were guilting for practically abandoning Mrs. Wright in an unhappy marriage. They made a connection of knowing Mrs. Wright before she was married, the contrast of her then and now is undeniable. Mrs. Wright was pretty and sweet but also timid bird before marriage, after marriage she was very isolated and unhappy.

    Even so, the domestic system the men have set up for their wives and their disregard for them after the rules and boundaries have been laid down prove to be the men's downfall. The evidence that Mrs. Wright killed her husband is woven into Mrs. Hale's and Mrs. Peters's conversations about Mrs. Wright's sawing and her pet bird. The knots in her quilt match those in the rope used to strangle Mr. Wright, and the bird, the last symbol of Mrs. Wright's vitality to be taken by her husband, is found dead. Unable to play the role of subservient wife anymore, Mrs. Wright is foreign to herself and therefore lives a lie. As Mrs. Hale proclaims, "It looks as if she didn't know what she was about!" (1177).