preview

Twenty-One Love Poems: Adrienne Rich And The Petrarchan Tradition

Good Essays

Adrienne Rich and the Petrarchan Tradition Critics are divided on whether Adrienne Rich’s sequence “Twenty-One Love Poems,” first published as a collection by the small women’s publisher Effie’s press in 1976 and reprinted in the volume A Dream of a Common Language 1978, are actually sonnets. Rich’s friend Hayden Carruth calls them “sonnetlike love poems” but then self-corrects: “No, call them true sonnets. For if they do not conform to the prescribed rules, they certainly come from the same lyrical conception that made the sonnet in the first place, and it is long past time to liberate the old term from its trammeling codes of technique” (81). Jane Hedley, on the other hand, says that the poems are not sonnets, but points out that by using …show more content…

This is something different, a female and lesbian sexuality and sensibility that has not been in poetry before” (Montenegro 14). My purpose in this essay is to examine how Rich grounds her sequence of love poems in the real world, rejecting patriarchal conventions of form, imagery, and figurative language that distance and objectify the beloved in order to give voice to the lesbian experience that remains underrepresented in literature.
Rich signals this intent in poem I by opening with images of Manhattan that both establish the sequence’s realism and signify male power over women, then introducing more hopeful feminine images to convey that relationships in the lesbian continuum will persevere in a hostile environment. The “we” of the poem “have to walk” wherever “screens flicker/with pornography, with science-fiction vampires,/victimized hirelings bending to the lash” (1-4). We can interpret these images through the lens of Rich’s essay “Compulsory Heterosexuality and Lesbian Existence,” published just two years after A Dream of a Common Language. In the essay, Rich argues that pornography’s influence is “a major public issue” because it depicts women as “objects of a sexual appetite devoid of emotional context, without …show more content…

Whereas sonnets in the Petrarchan and Shakespearean traditions delineate their arguments into discrete rhetorical units through rhyme scheme and syntax, Rich breaks free of these constraints, eschewing rhyme altogether and varying her sentence structure in the way that contributes to the intimate, conversational tone of the poems. Some earlier traditional male poets used the sonnets not just to praise loved ones, but to demonstrate their wit and linguistic skills: Sidney’s Astrophel and Stella series started a rage at court, and Keats composed “On the Grasshopper and the Cricket” for a sonnet competition. As Hedley points out, the sonnet’s “formal bias has to do with intricacy and difficulty, which calls attention to itself as a virtuoso performance” (329). Instead of conforming to a set of rules set forth by society and writing for others, Rich uses conversational diction and syntax, which is appropriate to the intimacy she shares with her beloved. However, closer inspection reveals a rhetorical structure that similar to a Petrarchan

Get Access