preview

US Military Approaches In Vietnam

Good Essays

H304: What characterized the evolution of US military approaches in Vietnam from initial employment through 1967? (517 words) The Vietnam War gradually expanded and escalated from 1962-1967 where three distinct phases characterized major shifts in the U.S. military approach. Contributing to the gradual expansion of military commitment was not only the lack of a comprehensive strategy, but also a failure to understand the enemy. Furthermore, policy makers viewed Vietnam in the context of containment where the U.S. approach centered on limited objectives; namely preventing the spread of communism and promoting regional security while avoiding war with Russia and China. Conversely, North Vietnam engaged in total war for unification while …show more content…

aimed to compel North Vietnam to cease its support to the Viet Cong. Therefore, phase two began in 1964 with the military adopting a two-track strategy. The strategy provided greater support to pacification in the south with complimenting raids in the north and air strikes in Laos. Additionally, in March 1964 President Johnson gained approval for NSAM-288 authorizing a 50,000-man increase in the ARVN along with the order to begin contingency planning for “Graduated Overt Military Pressure” against North Vietnam. Moreover, the Gulf of Tonkin incident garnered additional support for expanding the …show more content…

Phase three began in March of 1965 with Operation Rolling Thunder followed by a massive troop buildup through 1968. In conducting the counteroffensive, General Westmoreland focused on attrition through mass firepower and movement with pacification as a secondary effort. The aim was to search and destroy in high priority areas while buying time for the GVN and ARVN to get back on their feet. Consequently, rear security was not the major focus of U.S. forces. This combined with U.S. politics not only enabled Viet Cong freedom of maneuver, but also allowed the NVA to exploit the buffer zones along the border. As demonstrated in the evolution of the three phases, the U.S. response was reactionary, gradual, and limited despite an ever-increasing commitment. In many regards, this was due to the political climate, overall lack of strategy and clearly defined objectives, as well as a failure to understand the enemy. Meanwhile the enemy mobilized and engaged in total war for unification while evolving its tactics to counter U.S. weaponry, air power, and

Get Access