Mary Shelley has to be the most famous writer in her time that can be recognized for the work of “Frankenstein” that started the classic story of a mad scientist, creating a dead being that comes to life then later on becomes a danger to mankind. Yet the monster has developed emotional feelings that lead it to believe that it’s as real as any other person - though throughout the story of the mad scientist and the monster, having to be rewritten by different people who viewed the film and the book Frankenstein. Though it still has some of the original thoughts of having the mad scientist creating a being that would soon cause him to change his health and personality, and sometime leading up with the monster being left alone and lost in the unknown …show more content…
For what we could say that both of them had many things in common as in to enjoy life and wanting more to enjoy with close companions, but soon seeing how horrible reality could fall on them. Though both were different, Victor had shamed himself for making an abomination, while the monster was trying to present himself more to others. To better explain what Victor is than I could, then we can hear from James Whales, a man who directed “Frankenstein” making it show on screen, he says this for Frankenstein “as an intensely sane person, at times rather fanatical ... [yet] Frankenstein's nerves are all to pieces. He is a very strong, extremely dominant personality, sometimes quite strange and queer, sometimes very soft sympathetic and decidedly romantic”. Though this is low for the monster’s story about what kind of person or thing for what makes himself, it could be that he’s just an experiment gone wrong, or something that shouldn’t be made ever ?, though this is a debate about something different, but I could just personally that the monster is a rather more of a person than any other human he ever
Frankenstein’s creation was lost in the world with no one who could have understood him . It felt sorrowful and unfulfilled emotions as seen in this quote. Betrayal by Victor leaves a large impact the monster carried, which, turned into a monster full of hate and dissatisfaction. Victor’s creation was not a monster , but new born baby in a grown horrific body that was not to be called his own . It becomes a monster both mentally and physically, who will be feared by all . Victor not giving him the love he needed gets the monster enraged, which leads the monster to cause series of events that affects Victor unforgivably. .
There are evident similarities between Victor Frankenstein and his creation. Both Frankenstein and his creation share a love for nature, a longing for knowledge, and a desire for companionship.
The novel Frankenstein was written by Mary Shelley in 1818. This gothic romance novel tells the story of a philosopher who discovered how to create life, without the full knowledge that his actions could cause grave consequences. Universal Studios made the film version of this novel in 1931. Unfortunately, the film version of Frankenstein has more differences than similarities to the novel. In the novel, Victor’s mental obsession seems to be more severe than in the film. The character of Victor Frankenstein was portrayed in both the novel and the film as a veriphobe, or one who is afraid of the truth, in this case, the truth of his actions. He
I can compare Frankenstein to the movie I saw by Tim Burton, Frankenweenie. They are similar but instead of a human body, it was a dog and the mad scientist was a young boy named Victor Frankenstein. The young Victor Frankenstein brings his dog back to life after being hit by a car for a science fair project while the real Victor Frankenstein wanted to create a real life human. Just like the real Frankenstein monster, the dog brings trouble. In the book, the mad scientist, denies the monster but in Frankenweenie, the young boy convinces his family and friends to like his creation. Some of his classmates had known the young Victor Frankenstein creation and was intrigued to do the same experiment like his but it went out of the standards of
In Frankenstein, the reader is presented with two main characters of which are both monsters. Nevertheless one must be crowned as the true monster. The Creature is a monster who posses the free will and consciousness of a human. Victor is a human being trying to play God. They both have felt pain and anger; they were driven to do unspeakable things. However one is worse than the other.
Throughout Frankenstein, Victor proves to be quite an egotistical person. Victor’s actions will sometimes be selfish and not as noble as he would like others to believe. He creates the monster with a desire to obtain awe and fame and to make sure that his name will be remembered throughout history. “… a light so brilliant and wondrous… that I alone should be reserved to discover so astonishing a secret” (Shelley 37). While this discovery of Victor’s may be groundbreaking, he fails to think of the negative consequences, only thinking of himself and what this could potentially
In the book they both suffer the same fate dying alone which is a fear Victor and his creature especially had. Victor always prided himself around his family, and was always the most wretched when they passed. The creature wanted a mate to bond with no matter how miserable the conditions were because at least he would have someone to love and die with. Victor failed in doing this, and suffered the consequences for his failure to comply to the simple needs of his creation. To further analyze, T.J Madigan explains “If Frankenstein can be faulted-as indeed he can – it is not for hubris, but rather for the very qualities he mentions above, cowardice and carelessness. For he performs his operation without telling anyone else, and when his creation comes to life, he rejects it by running away and hoping the creature will die. This rejection of what he has brought about his failure to share his findings with the scientific community, or the people around him ultimately leads to tragedy” (Madigan). Victor was too afraid of being ousted by the scientific community if he shared this. If Victor had done so, he may have been either taken as a joke or an evil doer. Victor may have had help to control his creature and avoid death all over, but it is because of the ridicule of the society that stopped him from sharing his
In the novel Frankenstein, Victor Frankenstein creates a creature. The novel is based on the events prior to the creature's birth to virtually the creature's destruction. Prior to reading this book, some people believe that Victor and the creature will not be similar nor will they have anything in common, but this is a common misconception of the novel. Victor and the creature are similar in more ways than one.
In Mary Shelley's novel, Frankenstein, Victor Frankenstein and his creature are alike, yet different, as people and as monsters. Not many people see the plot twist in this story, but it is the thing that's stood out most to me when I read this. Most people i talk to say that the creature is the monster in this book, but I don't see it like that. I my point of view, I see victor Frankenstein as the monster. I say this because I found more reasons that he his the monster and also found the similarities outweigh the differences.
One outstanding contrast refers to their personal histories. While Victor is raised in greatest harmony by his caring parents (Shelley 19), who supply him with love and parental affection, his creature experiences no support whatsoever. The unconditional bond of love that is usually tied between parents and their children cannot be built up among the two main characters of the novel (Shelley 84). Moreover, Frankenstein often mentions the importance of his “companions amiable” (Shelley 21) in Geneva and that he has the luck to enjoy “mutual affection” (25) in his life. As opposed to that, the monster has to endure refusal throughout the whole plot. He is expelled by his own creator and strangers, alike (Shelley 73). Another difference concerning how both figures are raised is their education. Acquiring knowledge seems to be an important issue for Frankenstein’s family. Therefore, Victor is able to learn many languages at home and is even supported in moving to Ingolstadt for his further studies in science (Shelley 21, 25). His monster, on the other hand, is not taught any languages actively, but rather adopts the one spoken by peasants, whom he covertly listens to (Shelley 75). In summary, there are quite a number of differences in how Victor and the monster grow up that affect the way they behave in their later
Victor Frankenstein is in many ways more monstrous than the monster he created. Victor and his creation demonstrate a thesis-antithesis correspondence wherein they reflect opposite character traits. Victor has no sense of empathy or compassion, whereas the monster, although hideous and rejected by society as an outcast, has
Frankenstein’ is a classic science fiction novel by Mary Shelley that portrays a mad scientist, Victor Frankenstein, who creates a grotesque, intelligent monster and abandons it after it horrifies him with its monstrous appearance. ‘Frankenstein’ was published in 1818 which was a time when science, art and politics were revolutionising the world through new ideas and concepts. This had a huge influence on Mary, as well as her parents who were both radical philosophers and writers.
Throughout the story the Frankenstein’s monster is referred to as a true monster because of the different acts that he has committed, yet throughout the story the reader is made aware of the compassion and morality that Victor’s” creature possesses, like a real human. Victor is the true monster in this horror novel, because he possesses many of the characteristics that would define what a monster is. Victor Frankenstein created his monster due to his eagerness for alchemy and his unnatural obsession with being like God. Victor does not take into account the consequences of his actions. Victor rejects his creation the moment he lays eyes on it, and this caused the monster to perform the acts that he did. The cruel rejection is what begins the a journey that will soon enough be end of Victor. After Victor decides to go back on creating his monster a mate, he then destroys the half made creature which anger Frankenstein’s monster and this cause him wreak revenge on his creator. The monster tells Victor that he will be at his wedding night and the killing spree beings, Victor loses his father, and his friend Henry Clerval because of what Victor had done. In my opinion I believe that should have stuck to creating his monster a mate and this would have made things easier for him and
as a son. Whereas in the 1957 film he is in a box full of water, and
In Frankenstein – A Critical Study from a Freudian Perspective, it compares the monster and Victor and concludes that the monster and Victor is the “mirror-inversion”, it states that they “both are intelligent and well educated, and both start out with the impulse to be good” (Johnson 3), for example: Victor is a “dutiful son and the monster in his efforts to help the de Lacey family”, and “Yet both end up as murderers, haunted and hunted by each other” (Johnson 3). I agree with this, Victor and the monster are like contradictory parts of a same person; the monster is active and energetic but also violent and cruel, it is like the evil side of Victor. And this is the reason that Victor constantly tries to get rid of the monster but fail to do so: the monster represents Victor’s dark side, and Victor can’t escape from his own negative thoughts. Moreover, every time when Victor makes the decision which relates to the monster, the monster is like a mirror that reflects Victor’s irresponsible, timid and selfish characters, and it’s the growing of these negative characters which lead Victor to frequently make the false decision. Overall, the monster makes Victor comes to a deep understanding of his characters: if Victor does not create the monster, he would never know how destructive his mind is; also,