Violent Comics Are the New Superheroes In the writing of Gerard Jones “Violent Media is Good for Kids” is very interesting essay in which he describes how violent media can help kids to overcome obstacles, but whether it is convincing or not, I am not truly sure because the way the essay is written is biased. Jones as writer is making this controversial topic to gain more audience to read his writings, in addition, this essay fails in detail, it needs more statistics to support the examples that Jones addresses in his essay. Also, we need more information about what is the opinion of parents of these kids that believed violet media is good so, we need the statistics of the studies of the psychologist that support the idea of good …show more content…
a psychologist did with urban teens. He said that “Children need violence entertainment to explore the inescapable feelings that they have been taught to deny and to reintegrate those feelings into a more complex selfhood” (200). This is another good point that Jones gave to convince people that violent media is good, but this example is needs more statistic on the results on the use of violent comics in other areas because this is limited to urban kids only and this characteristic created a doubt of the studies that the psychologist did to support the idea
According to Gerard Jones, violent media can have positive effects on young people. Violent media can help them to overcome difficulties and they can have a positive influence on children because the kids uses violent stories to meet their emotional and developmental needs. Jones makes some good points. One example that Jones gives is “Pretending to have superhuman powers helps children conquer the feelings of powerlessness that inevitably come with being so young and small.” (200). This example that Jones used to prove that superheroes helps this children with the superpower that they have is a weak statement because is biased. He is a comic writer. When he gives this point is creating more interest in his stories that he writes not necessary in the real problem that the children have. Also, where are the statistics that prove the ages and location of these kids
Violent media exposure of children or adults to violent media is a cause of aggression and violent behavior has been one of the most intensely debated issues in criminal justice and the broader populace. Concern have come and gone that media such as comic books, as well as television and movies, would lead to waves of rebelliousness, violence, and moral degradation. Sherry
From infancy onward, parents and teachers have drilled into the young generation that violence should be avoided at all costs. They have preached cooperation, tolerance, and “using one’s words” as tactics to combat difficult situations. Although those lessons are valid, Gerald Jones claims there is an alternative way. In his essay, “Violent Media is Good for Kids,” Jones argues that “creative violence- bonking cartoons, bloody videogames, toy guns-gives children a tool to master their rage” (Jones). In other words, media violence, used correctly, can serve as an alternative method for powering through adolescence. By reading and writing violent stories, children are able to express
Violent media can affect every child differently, but hitting young targets can cause a negative effect. “Research has associated exposure to media violence with a variety of physical and mental health problems for children and adolescents, including aggressive and violent behavior, bullying, desensitization to violence, fear, depression, nightmares, and sleep disturbances”(Media Violence). This demonstrates the influence among kids when they are exposed to the violent media. This should not be any characteristics among kids to have especially bullying,
From early childhood, parents, teachers, and other adults instill in us that violence is bad and unethical. We can all agree that we should avoid certain forms of violent behavior if possible; however, it is incorrect to assume that all forms of violence is bad. In his article "Violent Media is Good For Kids", Gerald Jones argues that "creative violence" such as gory video games, Comic books, and play fighting give children tools to master rage and actually help more kids than they hurt. What the author is saying here is correct because children use these types of influences in imaginary play at a young age,
Mother Jones, an American independent news organization, published the essay, “Violent Media is Good for Kids” by Gerard Jones on June 28, 2000. In this article, Jones, a comic book writer, argues that violent media can have positive effects on children’s behavior. In fact, he asserts that “superhero stories helps kids negotiate the conflicts between the inner self and the public self” (60). Even though Jones’s thesis, refutation, and the conclusion are strong to support his argument, his evidence is weak to convince his audience about his point of view.
Jones admits that violent media is not harmless and that it does inspire some children into doing real life violence, but goes on to say that it has helped more than it has harmed. Like Jones mentions before, "When we try to protect our children from their own feelings and fantasies, we shelter them not against violence but against power and selfhood." I know, from personal understanding, that when you grow up fearing to express your feelings because you are afraid that you are going to get in trouble either at home or at school, you bottle everything up inside you and do not let go of it easily. Its common knowledge that if you bottle something up for too long it is either going to come out somehow, whether you want it to or not.
The article on violent media is good for kids By: Gerald Jones was a fantastic article. In the article Jones talks about how certain forms of violent media is good for children. There are all a lot of points that go with his statement, or go against it. In this paper I will be talking about Jones’s ideas and point of view on his article.
Most parents are very protective of their young children. They feel that if their impressionable young children aren’t exposed to violent media they would be less likely to act out. Gernard Jones in “Violent Media is Good for Kids” argues that the positive effects of violent media, including certain video games and gangster rap, far exceeds the minimal negative effects. I agree with Jones’s controversial stance on this topic. Sorry to break it to any parents who aren’t aware, children grow older and at some point in their life they will get mad, possibly even violent. It’s going to happen an unnumberable amount of times and there is nothing that can be done to completely eliminate this reaction which is a central part of human nature. As Jones
“Violent Media is Good for Kids,” written by Gerard Jones, is an interesting argument about the positive aspects of violent media. He has narrated his own experience as a child about the impact of violent media. Jones has further developed his argument to convince parents about the importance of violent media by noting that exposing kids to violent media helps the kids to overcome their fear. Jones is focused on parents and teachers, both of whom restricts the exposure of kids to violent media. He also notes the skeptical thinking, which argues that violent media have a negative impression on kids. His argument is catchy and strong based on his own realizations of the world and experience. Let us discuss how he has made the argument realistic.
The essay “Violent Media is Good for Kids” by Gerard Jones was published by the New York Times in 2000. Jones was a well-known author both in fiction and nonfiction and mainly focused on comic books. Jones argues that the violent behaviors depicted in comic books can be beneficial because they can help children overcome their fears. Jones incorrectly assumes that all children are the same and although a comic book may help one child, other children may become emotionally scarred by them.
Violent Media Is Good for Kids by Gerard Jones is a very well written essay. It explains the basic factors of violent media and the positive effects of it on the children. However, is this really true? Are the children really benefiting from watching violent shows? Are violent video games helping out the children? Answer to these questions is no. Violence was never good and never will be. Violent Media is a weapon that is mostly used in many countries for destruction and criticizing the political system. Lastly, it is best to shield our children from all forms of violence.
“Violent media is good for kids” is a fascinating article written by Gerard Jones. He makes an argument about how many forms of creative violence help many more children than they harm by giving them a tool to master their rage. At thirteen years of age he explains how forms of violence have been insightful and impactful for him. Growing up alone and afraid Gerard was taught by his parents that rage was something to be overcome and that violence was wrong. He was placed in a small school he felt was wrong for him, but then he withdrew from his loneliness when he became introduced to Marvel comics. Specifically, a character in the Marvel comics he felt he could relate to named the Hulk caught his eye and freed
Gerard Jones believes that violent media has helped hundreds of people for everyone it has hurt, and it can help far more if we learn to use it well because it can serve as a useful function for younger people. Gerard Jones goes further into detail stating that he believes violence media are a positive influence due to the fact that it helps children push back against a modern culture that cultivates fear and teaches dependency. Jones makes a very good and valid point where he states that “creative violence” gives children a tool to master their rage which is positive because rage can be an energizing emotion, a shot of courage to push us to resist greater threats, take more control, than we ever thought we could. “Children need violent entertainment
There are two assumptions in the Jones’s article, and one of them is underlying. When Jones asserts violent media embolden himself and his son to overcome fear and be brave to everything, it strongly imply people gain confidence by watching violent media. Another of the author’s assumption is that violent media teach children to control their emotion. In the article, Jones states “people pulling themselves out of emotional traps by immersing themselves in violent stories” and “Pretending to have superman powers helps children conquer the feeling of powerlessness…” to assume violent media assists children when they are facing emotional issues. While children cannot take control of their emotions, the superheroes in the violent media become an
In the writing of Gerard Jones “Violent Media is Good for Kids” is a very interesting essay in which he describes how violent media can help kids to overcome obstacles. Also, he describes that some kids that used to be shy become outgoing by reading comics, he makes his point by saying the kids who reads this comic, get confident by identifying with the superheroes of the stories that they read. He gave examples of kids that were treated with violent media, but I am not truly sure if this is effective in kids or not because in the examples that he gave needs more details on how they become effective in helping these kids with their problems, also this point will be more persuade if the author supports his examples with information of the parents of these kids that believed violent media is good.