preview

Virginia Woolf And Annie Dillard's Death Of A Moth

Decent Essays

In both pieces from Virginia Woolf and Annie Dillard’s Death of a Moth, the story revolves around the death of a moth and the consequential depiction of death both authors has on the occurrence. However, although both pieces share the same title, both authors had a completely different interpretation of the death of a moth, especially regarding tone and style. That is to say, Woolf gives us a view of death as honorable with subtle empathy, whereas Dillard pursues a more introspective notion, relaying the reader that death is an inevitable event that ends without the acceptance of what is to come.
To begin, one notable difference between the two authors’ perspective is that Woolf does not include her immediate surroundings. She excludes …show more content…

To clarify, the view of the event seemed to have different effects on respective writers as each writer had a different interpretation of the moth. For instance, because Dillard is viewing the event head-on, her description is less sensitive and often quite animated. To illustrate, she describes the burning moth as “this moth-essence, this spectacular skeleton, began to act as a wick.” Perhaps, the different locality did have different effects on respective writers. Because this influence in tone and style is unequivocally depicted in Woolf’s work as well. In fact, because of the lack of closeness between the spectator and the event, Woolf’s interpretation of the death of the moth is rather indifferent and lacks any manner of empathy. Woolf’s tone and diction are comparatively speaking are more reverent and solemn, one particular example is when Woolf’ juxtaposes the death of the moth as a soldier dying in battle with honor. Her writing is filled with fascination but yet empty to a certain degree, describing death as an omniscient force that will eventually overwhelm all living things. Perhaps, it is all caused by her locality and view of the site. To add on from the concrete dissimilarities of both author’s interpretations. Both pieces also have conflicting moral and this can be derived from the fact that the pieces were written in different time periods and two totally different authors. It is evident that both authors drew

Get Access