The DC current source uncertainty components listed in Table 2 to Table 5 include both those derived from Eq. 1 and additional systematic components (voltmeter calibration, reproducibility, long-term drift, and loop gain). Each component is explained below. Feedback resistance is the combined standard uncertainty from the QED calibration report, i.e., one half of the expanded uncertainty (k = 2), see Table 1. This is only a relative component (Table 3 and Table 5), there is no absolute uncertainty component (Table 2 and Table 4) for the feedback resistance. Measurement noise is the average “noise” of multiple samples. In Table 2 and Table 4 the measurement noise is defined by the standard deviation of the offset (I = 0) measurement. In …show more content…
2 is shown in Table 6 (absolute term) and Table 7 (relative term). These tables vary by DUT model. For efficiency, the values in the table are determined after evaluating several DUTs of the same model and used for subsequent DUTs of this model if the measurement noise is less than the values in the tables. A similar set of tables is generated for the Keithley 6430 current source (not presented). Table 6. Absolute term for the standard uncertainty budget of the current-to-voltage conversion gain (G(I)) of a DUT using the Keithley 263 DC current source. Absolute standard uncertainty [V x 10-6] Uncertainty components Type Range 1x104 V/A 1x105 V/A 1x106 V/A 1x107 V/A 1x108 V/A 1x109 V/A Current B 7.18 26.3 30.4 26.9 43.6 40.9 Measurement noise A 11.2 22.6 32.7 25.9 41.2 32.4 Voltage measurement B 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 Reproducibility (6 months) A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Loop gain B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Combined absolute standard uncertainty term of G(I) measurement 13.3 34.7 44.6 37.4 60.0 52.2 Table 7. Relative term for the standard uncertainty budget of the current-to-voltage conversion gain (G(I)) of a DUT using the Keithley 263 DC current source. Relative standard uncertainty [x10-6] Uncertainty components Type Range 1x104 V/A 1x105 V/A 1x106 V/A 1x107 V/A 1x108 V/A 1x109 V/A Current B 3.18 5.81 5.61 6.46 8.57 14.6 Measurement noise A 0.19
V The next task is to calculate I 2 and the associated uncertainties. We obtained this mean value by calculating the weighted mean. From the equation below n i=1 n i=1 wi 2 σi 1 2 σi V I2 ,
The average deviation describes the precision of the results. It was determined the results our group obtained for were very precise. This is because our average deviation for Keq was only 6.8 which comes out to be a 6. percent error. Due to our deviation being so low it indicates that the equilibrium constant is indeed a “constant”.
In many methods, skin and proximity effects are very important. Another important parameter is alternative current (a.c.) resistance, rac. This parameter is frequency dependence. It can be shown that rac increased with the increased of frequency (Du, & Burnett, (2000), (Demoulias, Labridis, Dokopoulos & Gouramanis, 2007), (Desmet, Vanalme, Belmans, & Van Dommelen, 2008). Some research papers used value from published graph such as by The Okonite Company and Anixter Inc. (The Okonite Company, 2001), (Anixter Inc., n.d.). However upon inspection, it was found that the graph is produced on the basis of fundamental frequency of 60 Hz and using imperial unit. Some other sources, although on 50 Hz as fundamental basis, give limited data such as (Moore, 1997), (Coates, n.d). As an alternative, formula from IEC 287-1-1 was used to calculate the rac (IEC, 1994).
The variables been shown in the simulater are the voltage, current, and ressistance. V(volts) = I(Ampers)* R(Ohms).
was derived and a relationship between Vinv and Vc was obtained (see Fig. 2). Applying voltage balance
Using the propagation of error formula, theoretical uncertainty of the unknown resistor RX can be calculated as,
The comparison of above three algorithms for 8, 16 and 32 bit operands with corresponding voltage and frequency are tabulated in table I
Figure.10 (a) Hardware test bench set up (b) Gating pulses for 70 KHz from DSP processor (c) Input voltage and input current waveforms for 230Vrms (d) Input voltage and input current waveforms for 110 Vrms
Using the analysis of small signals, V\textsubscript{GS} = V\textsubscript{in} and therefore the circuit of the voltage gain A\textsubscript{V} is given by the expression:
The operating supply voltage range from 2.7 V to 5.5 V and the bandwidth is 900 MHz. The specified input voltage noise is 0.69 nV/√Hz and the input current noise is 2.6 pA/√Hz. Moreover, the amplifier has low distortion values (HD2/HD3 = -90 dBc) and ultra-low offset errors of 800 µV over the maximum operational temperature. Noise calculations for one of the parallel stages in the non-inverting configuration for the prototyped LNA is explained and the block diagram of such an amplifier with source, resistors, and the noise model is shown in figure 2, where en denote the voltage noise, in- denote the current noise at the inverting input and er denote the thermal
During lab, we have designed circuits proving each of these electrical principles. Now, let's apply this knowledge to a real world application.
Extended range of 120dB utilizing the linear to logarithmic transformation of photocurrent in to sense signal voltage with compromise on contrast and brightness [124].
& SEP-E $\qquad\qquad$ & mulSEP $\qquad \qquad $& EH-mulSEP & &\qquad& SEP-E $\qquad\qquad$& mulSEP \\
By David Wenzhong Gao, Senior Member IEEE, Chris Mi, Senior Member IEEE, and Ali Emadi, Senior Member IEEE
In order to achieve the required degree of stability, generally indicated by phase margin, other performance parameters are usually compromised. As a result, designing an op-amp that meets all specifications needs a good compensation strategy and design methodology [1].