Hello everyone I’m your host Paul Mart and welcome to Government Watch. The show where we take a look at how much the government has been watching us! Tonight's contestants are the former colony of Great Britain the United States of America and the former colony of Great Britain, Australia. For those of you who are joining us for the first time tonight our show works like this: We have two contests, Accuracy and journalistic protections. The countries win the game by having the worst scores in each of the contests. Who's ready to government watch?! (Show sign saying cheer) Our first category with which we will test the watchful nature of the government is the test to see whether or not the government can find where you are right now … without a warrant. Alrighty, get your mobile phones out everybody! Get your phones out! In Australia right now thanks to some looser metadata surveillance laws the …show more content…
I know what some of you are thinking. But but Paul, if I’ve done nothing wrong and am not a journalist I’ll be fine right? Right? Wrong! Introducing Brandon Mayfield. A lawyer who experienced the full force of a nanny-state armed with confirmation bias. Confirmation bias is when an investigation agency finds a target and works backwards from a perceived understanding of guilt. Mayfield was an American lawyer who was jailed for 2 weeks as a result of being involved in the Madrid bombings. But he wasn’t involved in the bombings. That’s right. He was not involved at all. He spent 2 weeks fearing that he may get a beating from another prisoner for having links to an event he was not at all involved in. Considering that the only evidence was that he’d converted to Islam 6 months ago and that nearly all the evidence was against him being guilty; including the initial evidence of a phony fingerprint and his passport being outdated by two years, too much information dulls the job of having the information in the first
Today, Canadian’s lives today are as translucent as ever. Most organizations especially the government constantly watches each and every one of our moves. By definition, surveillance is any systematic focus on any information in order to influence, manage, entitle, or control those whose information is collected. (Bennet et Al, 6). From driving to the shopping mall to withdrawing money from the ATM machine, Canadians are being watched constantly. With Canada’s commitment to advance technology and infrastructure in the 1960s, government surveillance is much easier and much more prevalent than it was hundreds of years ago. Even as early as 1940s, the Dominion Bureau of Statistics used punch cards and machines to determine who is available
3. What kind of invasion of privacy exist in Oceania? The two-way telescreen, the Police Patrol swooping down in helicopters to peer in people’s windows, the constant fear of being targeted as an enemy by the Thought Police, the posters of Big Brother with reminders the “Big Brother is Watching You.”
1984, a novel by George Orwell, represents a dystopian society in which the people of Oceania are surveilled by the government almost all the time and have no freedoms. Today, citizens of the United States and other countries are watched in a similar way. Though different technological and personal ways of keeping watch on society than 1984, today’s government is also able to monitor most aspects of the people’s life. 1984 might be a dystopian society, but today’s condition seems to be moving towards that controlling state, where the citizens are surveilled by the government at all times.
“Government exists to protect us from each other. Where government has gone beyond its limits is in deciding to protect us from ourselves”(Reagan). In the book, 1984, Winston recognizes the power the government has over the citizens of Oceania. The citizens lack privacy from the government. George Orwell warns society about a government with total control in 1984. Based on Dana Hawkin’s article, “Cheap Video Cameras Are Monitoring Our Every Move”, as well as Beech Etal’s, “The Other Side of the Great Firewall”, society may truly have something to fear in the form of surveillance and information manipulation.
Many Americans do not realize that at any time of the day the government could be observing their “private” lives. On the other hand, some individuals have predicted the government would develop a form of constant surveillance, like George Orwell who forecasted a futuristic government, which used technology as a relentless eye on the members of the society in the novel 1984. 1984 was correct, to an extent, in predicting that the government would increase their usage of technology to constantly observe their people, whether in public or their private homes.
I am sure that everyone of you have heard about aliens and UFOs. Indeed, we all have heard about the famous case of aliens and UFOs in Roswell, New Mexico. Most people might be interested in the topic of aliens, but I know that the majority of you just think of it as rumours and the existence of them are impossible. Therefore, I am standing here in front all of you to make you change your perspective. I am strongly confident that I have found the evidence of their real existence to convince all of you.
As much as they may deny it, the government possesses many ways to watch our actions. Whether it be through our emails, internet history, or even our phones, the government has a way to watch us. This is also seen in George Orwell’s novel, 1984, where everyone living in the authoritarian government of Oceania are constantly monitored through a telescreen. Through the telescreens, the government, known as the Party, is able to accurately see and hear whatever anyone is doing anywhere within their homes while also constantly feeding their citizens propaganda glorifying the Party.. Any discovered form of opposition against the Party and their “overseer,” Big Brother, is dealt with by the Thought Police, who are the enforcers of the Party.
In our society the government watches and listens to us and we don't even know it. They tap into phones
The constant watch over the citizens is accomplished with the use of telescreens, microphones, children, and the Thought Police. If anyone is found to be taking actions or thoughts against the ideas the Party puts in place, he or she will be punished. The Thought Police keeps note of people’s thoughts, though there is “no way of knowing whether [an individual is] being watched at any given moment” (3). If a thought comes up that is frowned upon the individual with that thought could be vaporized, imprisoned, tortured, or killed. Today, there should be no fear over whether the government is keeping track of peoples’ personal information as it is assumed there is some privacy from the government. In reality, every person is subject to similar surveillance as those in Oceania, whether it is by the government, family members, friends, or strangers. The government has surveillance cameras set up around the country, criminals are going through trash, and hackers are breaking into computers, trying to steal people's’ identities. It is impossible for any kind of individualism to flourish if an individual or object is always watching or listening, but surveillance is inevitable, both in Oceania’s society in 1984 and in our society today, whether citizens
Persuasive speech outline purpose: To persuade my audience to donate blood through the American Red Cross. Introduction:
I will now argue that the mass surveillance of citizens by the participants of the Five Eyes program: The United States, Canada, Britain, Australia, and New Zealand is a clear violation of human rights. I will do this by demonstrating that government policy is inconsistent with article 12 of The Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR).
government surveillance. In the name of ‘safety’, just like in 1949, governments have set up
I completely agree with what you have to say about Wal*Mart. I have numerous friends that work at Wal*Mart and they absolutely hate working there just because of how they are treated by other employees and managers.
Individuals claim that the states throughout our country are always being watched by the Government; our every move, our every purchase, and even our every commute to and from work are being monitored. Welsh and Farrington(2004) both agree in explaining that the closed-circuit television(CCTV) is doing the exact same thing. "America is on the verge of becoming a 'surveillance society' (Stanley and Steinhardt, 2003:1)" (Welsh, 2004: 2). George Orwell discusses that “Every single technical device that has been invented, restored, or refurbished in the last ten years is becoming an increasing negative towards individuals freedom of interference”, but Welsh and Farrington seem to disagree. "Fact is, there are no longer any barriers to the Big Brother regime portrayed by George Orwell" (Welsh, 2004:2).
For example, using a leftover coffee can for loose nails or screws, or even washing and reusing a plastic zip-loc bag instead of throwing it in the garbage. Thrift shopping is a way of reusing someone else’s unwanted goods. As I spoke about in an earlier speech about thrifting, I included many locations and ways to thrift, also the benefits to the shopper and the donator. One place in particular was shopping at the local boys and girls club. I personally shop there, keeping my eyes open for a good deal. For example, the pair of jeans that I am wearing today was purchased from this store just a few months ago. I paid only $8.00 for this pair of Lucky Jeans and according to buckle.com, a retailer for lucky jeans the retail price is $99.00 that is a savings to me of $91.00.I am not the type to worry about name brands, but quality usually does cost more. If I can get a quality pair of jeans at a fraction on the price, I am glad to shop at the thrift store. I am thankful to the person that made the donation of the lucky jeans and they can benefit from that donation. According to the IRS webpage, IRS. Gov it explains that an individual can donate items like clothing, household furniture and furnishings, a car or boat, even taxidermy. The donations are appraised, by the donator, and recorded. At the time of filing taxes if the donation equals at least $500 for the year, the donator may take advantage of the