Monster essay People today make bad decisions. Some examples are in the book called Monster by Walter Dean Myers. This book is about Steve if he is guilty or not. Steve was the lookout and was responsible for Mr. Nesbit death because Steve was there, evolved, and felony murder. First of all, Steve was the lookout because he was in the store a little time before the robbery. Like in the line that King said “Yeah, All we need is a lookout check the place out make sure ain't no badges copping some Z’s in the back. You down for it?”(150). This represents that he had a choice to do it and he chose yes. Second of all, he was involved with the crime. He was there and he was a part of it. In the line that Bobo says “Waiting for him(Steve) to come
Steve was found innocent because he wasn’t recognized by any of the witnesses, his teacher defended him on the stand and Bobo Evans (who was involved in the crime) couldn’t confirm where Steve was when Mr. Nesbitt got shot. In the end this case can be used as an example of how innocent people can be blamed for a crime they didn’t even commit or have a part in. In today’s world, anybody can be accused of a crime and can be taken to jail without any further investigation or evidence to help or hurt their case. In Steve’s case however, all the evidence and testimonies proved his case of being
In today’s society there are violent people. Some of these people can be found in the book Monster by Walter dean Myers. The main character is Steve Harmon and he is facing trial for murder. Steve was the lookout but wasn’t responsible for Mr.Nesbitt's death. Steve is on trial for murder because he was in the store that day
This research paper is based on the actions of the serial killer named Randy Kraft. This paper will contain three separate theories that will be used to describe and possibly answer reasons why he did what he did. The three theories that will be included are rational choice and routine activities from the Choice Theory, the social strain theory from the Social Structure Theory and the social control theories from the Social Process Theory.
In the book Monster by Walter Dean Myers, two boys named Steve Harmon and James King are facing charges for felony murder. Sandra Petrocelli is the prosecutor, and Kathy O’Brien is the defense attorney for Steve Harmon. They both do an excellent job with their arguments, however, they both want different things. Because O’Brien wants the jury to see Steve as a good person while Petrocelli wants the jury to see Steve as a monster, they each must bring their strongest arguments to determine Steve’s guilt or innocence. Kathy O’Brien is Steve Harmon’s defense attorney, and her job is to prove Steve not guilty.
Criminology is the study of why individuals commit crimes. Several sociologists and criminologists have developed theories that attempt to explain criminal behavior and why it occurs. In earlier times, theories such as biological determinism and phrenology were often used to explain criminal behavior. Those theories have since been proven to be unreasonable and unrealistic. As time passed, sociologists and criminologists created more plausible theories including the rational choice, classical, conflict, labeling, life course, critical, strain, social disorganization, routine activity, social control, and positivist theories. In attempts to better understand these criminological theories, an individual could apply one (or more) of these theories to real-life events or things he/she has seen on television. I have chosen to apply the rational choice theory to the popular movie Taken starring Liam Neeson and explain the many examples found throughout the movie.
Steve has many flashbacks during the trial. One of his first flashbacks is with Johnny, Peaches, and King. They sat together while King was planning to rob the drugstore. King says, “I need to get paid, man. I ain’t got nothing between my butt and the ground but a rag.” (50) Steve agrees, “I hear that.”(50) This means that Steve had at least known about the plan to rob the drugstore, and was there when King was planning to rob the drugstore. In another flashback we read about Steve talking to Oswaldo Cruz, another person who was helping to rob the
On December 22 Alguinaldo Nesbitt, was murdered when Bobo Evans and James King were trying to rob his drugstore. Steve Harmon allegedly went into the drugstore to check for cops. We the jury have decided that Mr. Harmon is in fact not guilty of felony murder Mr. Nesbitt. Many testimonies stated that Steve Harmon didn’t participate in this crime.
In the Monster by Walter Dean Myers, the character Steve Harmon finds himself easily excepting of the label of a monster which was presented by Sandra Petrocelli "But there are also monsters in our community- people who are willing to steal and to kill, people who disregard the rights of others". Steve doesn't view himself as an active participant in the robbery which leads to the death of the store owner Alguinaldo Nesbitt and because of this he has not completely excepted the label of a monster, looking at Petrocelli point of view of what makes a monster showed Steve that regardless if he plays a minor role or are larger role, he still took part in the crime which leads to death of Mr. Nesbitt, a crime which showed no regard for the rights of others and willingness to steal and kill. Being a person of morals Steve should have seen that they were about to steal from an innocent person without consideration for the victim, even though murder may not have been apart of the plan it is still an act which victimizes someone and in some ways place people in danger. Secondly, Steve faces probably the most challenging of all, Steve realizes that his father now views him as a monster and not as his son. Mr. Harmon showed his disappointment when he shares with Steve what he dreamt of for his son "When you were first born, I would lie up in bed thinking about scenes of your life. You playing football. You going off to college. I used to think of you going to Morehouse and doing the same things I did when I was there. I never made the football team, but I thought—I dreamed you would. I never thought of seeing you in a place like this. It just never came to me that you'd ever be in any kind of trouble." This
How would you feel to be put on trial for a crime you did not commit? In the book, Monster by Walter Dean Myers, this is the case for a sixteen-year-old Harlem boy named Steve Harmon. Steve is on trial for felony murder because he has been accused of being involved in being the lookout for a robbery that took place on December 22nd in an uptown convenience store that resulted in the shooting of Alguinaldo Nesbitt, the convenience store clerk. Steve Harmon is innocent for the reasoning’s of he does not know who Richard Evans is, the convenience store was not empty, and there was no signal.
Internal and External Description: He is thought by some people as a “talented, bright, and compassionate" kid, on the other hand, some people call him a “Monster”. He isn’t violent, and when he compares himself with the criminals he feels he doesn’t fit in with them. He is scared of the jail environment and the prisoners around him as a result, he has suicidal thoughts. Steve loves his little brother Jerry and cares for his family very much. He appears to be truthful
The final example is going back to of Mice and Men. Lennie did not know right from wrong and he did not know what he was going to do. Lennie was a good person and was not causing any trouble. However, the woman provoked to touch her long soft hair. Lennie was influenced by Curley’s wife. If it wasn’t for this then Lennie could have become a good young man that perhaps would have gotten smarter. Unfortunately he could control himself and therefore killed someone.
Theories of crime causation get to the fundamental characteristics of human nature. Theories of crime causation can be separated into trait theories and choice theories. Both types of theories make valid points about the causes of crime, yet they are have different implications for preventing the causes of crime. Thesis: Trait theories and choice theories both assume that humans are self-interested, but their conceptions of self-interest limit the applicability of each to certain types of crime. Trait theories appear more suited for explaining the causes of violent crime, whereas choice theories are more appropriate to property crimes or economic crimes.
In this paper I will be explaining how criminals maximize utility and also relating it to the book “Things Fall Apart”. Another concept that I will be explaining is the concept of how important choice is to criminals and to the main character Okonkwo. The book “Things Fall Apart” has many examples of poor choices and Okonkwo inability to maximize utility.
Monsters run free in epic poems of centuries far past; horrific, villainous creatures of fantasy who illustrate all that is bad in the world and stand for the tribulations the epic hero much overcome. The Anglo-Saxon epic Beowulf is no different. Some are born of, and in turn give birth to legends, such as the fire-breathing dragon, while others are tied to the bible. In studies, Beowulf's monsters are explained and will continue to be analyzed as symbolic of countless different ideas. In relation to each other and the epic's hero, the monsters of Beowulf represent the ever-present flaws of humanity and the monstrous feelings or behaviors that over take the mind in a moment of weakness, leading to eventual downfall.
The next morning he got on the bus and sat with Donald and the two guys that were there the day before were not on the bus. When he got to the school he was walking to his class he got pulled into a janitor's closet. The people that pulled him were the guys. Steve was so scared he was shaking. They asked Steve.