War Powers Argument Analysis

Just war encourages peace for all people and indicates that even though it isn’t the best solution, it is still required. Everyone has the duty to stop a potentially fatal or unjust attack against someone else, even if it meant using violence against the attacker. Plus, all states have some important rights that must not be violated by either people or states, so when they’re violated or potentially getting violated, that state is entitled to defend itself through whatever means necessary. Also, the state that did the violating lost their privilege to not have their own rights violated through means of violence. Therefore, just war is ethically permissible.

When President Wilson sought to enter the war, however, his objectives went beyond the defense of U.S. maritime interests. In his War Message to Congress, he stated that the U.S. objective was “to vindicate the principles of peace and justice in the life of the world.” The U.S. Senate voted On April 4, 1917, in support of the measure to declare war on Germany. Two days later the House concurred. [5]

“When war is thrust upon the nation, the President had not only the authority but the responsibility to ‘resist force by force.’” –U.S. Supreme Court ruling of the Prize Cases, 1862 (67 U.S. 6335).

Throughout the history of the United States, the President has bypassed the Congress and engaged in warring actions. All cited Emergency Action as the qualifying reason. Some, after the fact asked congress for a declaration of war, others have not. Regardless, the Chief Executives seemed to have found that a formal declaration is not required whenever it would benefit them.

My thoughts about the power between Congress and The Presidency I think it’s all about balance. We look to Congress and The Supreme Court to lead our government and The President to be the head of our country to make hard decisions that sometimes lead our country into war. With that said neither one at the same time should have too much power we don’t want a dictatorship and our constitution was made to give the President the freedom to be great leaders. It's all about balance and doing what’s best for our country with both Congress and The

The act stated that in time of war, the President of the United States has the right to take action against any person who was a citizen of the country the United States was at war with. The President was given the power to act against the citizens of that country who were at war with the United States, as long as the person was a male, not a citizen of the United States, and at least fourteen years old.

Have you heard about Korean War, which occurred in June, 25, 1950? The conflict between ideologies caused this war with tens of millions killed, millions of families separated, the country reduced to rubble, and a huge permanent scar on Korea’s culture. Then, Vietnam War, Gulf War, or Iraq war can sound familiar to you. Let’s change point to the number of dead bodies from wars themselves. Can you guess how many people got killed during all of those war periods? Only for Vietnam War, the true civilians of Vietnam War were two millions in the north, and another two millions in the south, and military causalities were 1.1 million killed and six hundreds thousand wounded during war. To finish a war, how many innocent people and soldiers have

Nixon was able to limit congress’s oversight of his administration, and the publics control by using the Chief Diplomat formal power of secrecy. He wanted to use these formal powers to show that the president could plan and execute foreign policy as efficiently as historic leaders (Small 1999, 61).

This statement outlines the document’s validity. Because the Constitution is part of the law in the United States, everyone follows its rules, including government officials, making the document the most valid on the list. This high validity also leads to the strong weight that the document has; the Constitution was, and still is a very influential piece of text that shaped the way that this ountry functions now (Document A). One of the founders of American government, James Madison, talked about a President’s true power in letters to fellow founder Thomas Jefferson in 1793 and again in 1798. The following quotes and information they contain is valid and has a significant amount of weight because it was said by a founder of this country and was said during a time when the US was developing, and many people had different ideas on how things should

A2: It has been acceptable to violate the constitution when engaging in wars with other countries or your own.

After the Prize cases of 1863, the Executive exercised it’s power to act war-like in situations that looked like war in various regions throughout the globe. Congress however, soon

Congress and the president use their powers to check and balance each other. One power of Congress is the ability to declare war. However, Congress generally gives the president control during war time. Because of this, the president is able to acquire more power over the war while Congress can do little if they have already given their approval. After the Vietnam War, in which Presidents Johnson and Nixon continued to wage despite a divided Congress[i]; they decided that the Constitution did not warrant the president to have the power to declare war, so they passed the War

In the first premise, which says, “People in the military have a right to refuse to fight in a war when that conflicts with their values”. Eva and Hugh LaFollette kind of argued with that premise because they said that the people who refused should not be fired or should not lose promotions because of they refuse to fight in a war. However, Eva and Hugh LaFollette raise their objection toward the second premise which says, “A pharmacist refusing to fill a Plan B birth control prescription because it conflicts with her values is relevantly similar to a person in the military refusing to fight in a war that conflict with her values”. The objection of Eva and Hugh LaFollette in this

Congratulations on the new assignment with the Air Force. I think the argument of Cialdini and Goldstein (2004) is very true that social environment has profound effects on human behavior. Where people are not aware of the role others play on them to replicate similar behavior. The authors provided several reasons why people change their behavior to conform to others such as accuracy, affiliation, and positive self-concept. Whereas, the individual rely on a group consensus to interpret the situation accurately to behave in the correct manner, be able to obtain the social approval from other, and to enhance, protect, or repair their self-esteem (Cialdini and Goldstein, 2004).

The Just War Theory is a doctrine founded by Saint Augustine which has helped bring much discussion and debate to wars and the morality to fight in them. Wars and fights between people have gone on forever and are not perceived to stop anytime soon so it is important that some people thought about when and why they should ever fight. For many years Christians never part toke in this fighting due to teachings of the Bible and Jesus' teaching on 'turning the other cheek' and 'live by the sword, die by the sword'. Saint Augustine would be one of the first to talk about how a Christian could be a soldier and serve God at the same time. Through this thought we would receive the Just War Theory which gave a set of requirements for someone to partake