preview

Was Roosevelt A Pragmatist

Decent Essays

To understand whether FDR was to a greater extent an Isolationist in the 1930s, one must consider of his foreign policy in the 1930s and figure out which of his foreign policy was made in a perspective of an pragmatist, isolationist or gradualist. Finally, one must consider which of the three different views or perspective was to a greater extent, great extent or somewhat extent suitable to FDR with regards to his foreign policy.

Roosevelt was predominantly a Pragmatist with regards to his decision made throughout his foreign policy in 1930s. Despite Roosevelt understand that US involvement in war is crucial, and had won some support for his views in the quarantine speech; Roosevelt did not offered no real action due to concerns to be called …show more content…

Furthermore even Roosevelt had accepted the second neutrality act; he had still find various way to assist china in the Sino-Japanese war because public opinion favored china, however he didn’t openly assist China in a official way; therefore he wouldn’t be considered as a gradualist or a staunch isolationist. This is important because it shows that Roosevelt is more of a pragmatist since he also take consideration on what’s happening in the world as he realize that US involvement in war was unpreventable, therefore he had decide to Secretly assist China as it would help him on pushing US to war and it is also in favor to the public. Roosevelt had also invoked neutrality in the Italo-Abyssinian War 1935-6. This is important because it shows that Roosevelt is concerned about the conflict in Europe and the Far East as he did not wish to offend Italian Americans. By doing this it ensure that Italy would be well equipped to defeat Ethiopia as it allows Italy, a growing industrial power to bought large quantities of American oil; where Ethiopia had bought none as it was still feudal. Furthermore Roosevelt had also opposed the neutrality act of 1937 as it restricted his right as president to assist friendly countries. This is …show more content…

Roosevelt’s Good neighbor policy was a non-intervention policy that aims to promote good relationship with Latin America and solidify Latin American support through avoiding Military intervention of US to Latin America, but instead using a much more peaceful tone. This is important as it clearly shows that Roosevelt was not a staunch isolationist as the reason he want to maintain a good relationship with Latin is due to fear towards the conflict in Europe, so from this it could be seen that Roosevelt is actually preparing for intervention to war and is seeking for ways to gain more support and Latin American is one of it. In addition in August 1935, Roosevelt had also signed the Neutrality Act; a law that was designed to keep the United States out of a possible European war by banning shipment of war materiel to belligerents at the discretion of the President. This is important as despite aware of the rise of totalitarism, Roosevelt didn’t challenger over the congress over on the neutrality act and was willing to follow his good neighbor policy for the purpose of avoiding USA entanglements in the 1930s as Americans had been frightened by the tragic of war as memories of the First world War were still

Get Access