preview

Weaknesses Of Modern Prisons

Better Essays

The renowned inquiry performed by Gresham Sykes at the New Jersey State Maximum Security Prison in 1958 found that modern prisons are harmful to the psychological and physiological wellbeing of inmates (Sykes 1958). The response to lawbreaking and criminal justice methods have evolved from public spectacles of pain delivery and execution, into private punishment, rehabilitation, and reform in modern prisons.
INTRODUCTION
This paper will focus on chapter four of The Pains of Imprisonment from The Society of Captives (1958) by Gresham Sykes and specifically that modern prisons are painful, as they deprive prisoners of: liberty, heterosexual relationships – or intimacy – and autonomy. As such, this paper will not capture the totality of prison life, or all the “pains of imprisonment”. Sykes’ three deprivations imposed by modern prisons will be followed with counter arguments against his claim that modern prisons are harmful and or comparable to previous punitive methods (Sykes, 1958). The three counter arguments are as follows: (1) Bonta and Gerendau found a lack of proper methodology and incorrect assumptions which led Sykes to believe that prisons were harmful, (2) contemporary punishment is less damaging than previous punitive methods, (3) prisons must be depriving to deter. An argument will then contend these counter arguments in defense of Sykes’ initial claim that modern prison is both psychologically and physiologically.
First, prisoners are deprived of their liberty.

Get Access