What Are the Main Strengths and Weaknesses of the Rational Choice Appr

Success in our careers, in our investments, and in our life decisions, both major and minor—is as much the result of random factors as the result of skill, preparedness, and hard work.

On April 10th, 2015, two Detroit police officers in the city’s Narcotics Division were charged with robbing drug dealers during police searches performed over a four-year period. Due to their wide knowledge of narcotics, they were able to make a large profit by reselling the stolen drugs. They sold the drugs through private parties that included underground operations with other drug dealers in the state. The federal indictment was revealed to be eight-counts which included: possession with intent to distribute five or more kilograms of cocaine, robbery, extortion, possession of firearms and drug trafficking (Cook, 2015).

There is no set-in stone approach to live in this world and it isn't immediate. Religion must change sharply. Rather

This paper will cover two criminological theories and they will be applied to two types of criminality. The two theories chosen for the paper were developmental theory and rational choice theory. The two types of crimes that were chosen were organized crime, specifically focusing on gangs, and terrorism. Then the crimes will be compared and contrasted. Finally, the developmental theory will be applied to organized crime to explain why and how it happens. The rational choice theory will be applied to terrorism to explain what compels individuals to attempt this form of criminality.

Rational choice theory can also accurately explain the reasoning for Magnotta murdering Jun, however, the target was not Jun; it was fame and attention. In rational choice theory, the offender’s choices to be involved in crime serves as a function to obtain rewards that are worth the crime (Cornish and Clarke 1987). For Magnotta, recognition was a reward that exceeded the consequences. Each choice that he made was calculated to receive the maximum amount of pleasure from the attention the choice would generate. As he became more fixated with this idea, he began to make choices that would produce short-term attention, such as when he started rumors about dating Karla Homolka. He then went to a news outlet to deny these rumors (Jones 2012). This created a minor stir, but Magnotta was ready to

Introduction Based on the 2016 Canadian Crime Statistics it was discovered that the theory that best described Canada is the Rational Choice Theory. This theory explains that when people desire to commit a crime they have more reasons and see more positive outcomes with committing the crime and disobeying the law than not. Like most, Canadian citizens pick and choose their battles with committing crimes; they know what is legal and good, along with what is illegal and bad. The rational choice theory shows that most of the crimes being committed, were crimes that could possibly help support the committers families. Even though the cost of the crime was big, they had more reasons to commit the crime do to the larger outcomes

In a forever evolving universe, it is not uncommon for human beings to experience apprehension when it comes to the idea of change. While some are passionately working towards the future, others are struggling to grasp onto the remnants of the past. New generations are being born and with every new generation comes an increasingly advanced perspective of the world. Traditional ideals and ways of life are continuously expanding and becoming something that may be unrecognizable to some and unheard of to others. With this being said, however, there is one thing that will never be completely new: the concept of religion.

When it comes down to it, we all make our own decisions. We weigh the pros and cons to decide if the benefits outweigh the potential punishments. The idea of rational choice theory is that people choose their actions based on the options available and choose the one they most prefer. If their choice is to eat a donut or to not, when they really want to eat it, chances are they will eat it. Once you add in punishment, it gets more complicated. If the person were to be punished for eating it, they will most likely think it through more. Say, it’s a teenager who wants to eat the donut but he knows his father will ground him if he does. This donut is the teen’s favorite kind and he really really wants to eat the donut, but the risk of punishment is there, the teen will weigh the consequences against the benefits. Would he choose a few minutes of a tasty donut and risk being grounded for a week or would he choose to forgo the donut and not get in trouble? The act of having a choice to do something you want to do that also has consequences and causes you to rationally decide if it’s worth it or not is rational choice theory.

When I make a decision, cost and benefits are equally important because they weigh each other out when it is time to make a decision. In the chart, a benefit has the largest impact on my decision because most of the benefits are long-term and will impact the rest of my life. Most of the costs are short-term and this doesn’t out weight the benefits.

After taking the quiz on the website, it was determined that there was no clear theory that supported my ideology. However, the theory that I most support is rational choice theory because I believe that criminals commit criminal activities by consciously and rationally choosing to commit crimes. Rational choice theory is the idea that people commit crimes not because they are good or bad, but because they weigh out the pros and cons and determine the pros outweigh the cons to commit the crime (Criminal Justice). I believe that criminals are given a chose to decide whether they want to commit the crime or not, and they ultimately decide to commit the crime. In a research paper written by Scott M. Noveck, he discusses that criminals choose

Women use more legal drugs, most of which are prescribed by male physicians to keep them calm. Women’s illicit drug use has been increasing rapidly in the 1990s in the world. Homeless women have a high prevalence of risky use of illegal drugs (Upshur et al,. 2013). Homeless women intend to have low self-esteem and low motivation that can result in a high risk of drug and alcohol dependence. Prospective studies have found that a current substance use disorder, or frequent continued consumption of drugs are associated with lower prospects of exiting from homelessness, prolonged episodes of homelessness, and housing instability. Despite the high need, homeless women report limited use of addiction services (Upshur et al,. 2013). Roberston et al, found that 43.5% of homeless adults identified a need for addiction treatment but had not received services, while Wenzel et al, reported only 27.5% of homeless adults with substance use disorder had accessed inpatient or residential treatment in the last year, with even fewer, 5.6%, having any outpatient treatment (Upshur

For many people, finding a career that is both fulfilling and practical is a strenuous task. Fortunately, there is a plethora of different interventions, techniques, assessments, and inventories designed to aid those individuals in making the wisest career choices possible. But are any of those routes inherently better than the others? Or are all the differing options separate but equally effective? Donald Super’s Life Span Theory and John Holland’s Theory of Vocational Choice are just two of the many theories used for career counseling. Both methods are distinct in the way they approach career issues, yet despite their differences, there are some resemblances between the two theories as well. Comparing and contrasting these two theories will make it easier to see if one theory is better than the other for career counseling or if they are both equally effective.

More importantly we let religion in general seperate us from what potential we could have.

According to one of rational choice theory’s prominent and more thoughtful contemporary exponents, Peter C. Ordeshook, “four books mark the beginning of modern political theory: Anthony Downs’s An Economic Theory of Democracy (1957), Duncan Black’s Theory of Committees and Elections (1958), William H. Riker’s A Theory of Political Coalitions (1962), and James Buchanan and Gordon Tullock’s The Calculus of Consent (1962). These volumes, along with Kenneth Arrow’s Social Choice and Individual Values (1951), began such a wealth of research that political scientists today have difficulty digesting and synthesizing all but small parts of it. Consequently, the full value of this research often goes

Rational choice theory, also known simply as choice theory, is the assessment of a potential offender to commit a crime. Choice theory is the belief that committing a crime is a rational decision, based on cost benefit analysis. The would-be offender will weigh the costs of committing a particular crime: fines, jail time, and imprisonment versus the benefits: money, status, heightened adrenaline. Depending on which factors out-weigh the other, a criminal will decide to commit or forgo committing a crime. This decision making process makes committing a crime a rational choice. This theory can be used to explain why an offender will decide to commit burglary, robbery, aggravated assault, or murder.