What Does It Mean To Say That Graffiti Is Not Vandalism

Graffiti is a controversial topic in some areas that would say that graffiti can’t be considered art. But how can’t it be considered art? Does the location or the message of the art make it any less art? How much do people even know about graffiti, which is judged upon so hard in today's era?

Graffiti has been around for more than half a decade and practiced worldwide. However there is debate between whether it is a form of art or vandalism. Graffiti artists’ debate that many do not understand the reason most graffiti artist take the risk of incarceration, fines, injuries, and in some cases death to paint a wall. A graffiti artist can have the simple desire to become recognized, or to create a piece that speaks to their audience as a form of self expression. Because graffiti is associated with gangs and acts of destruction to some many cannot see the history and importance graffiti can have on a worldwide scale. Due to the fact that graffiti is usually produced illegally, meaning it is

Graffiti is something that nearly every place in the world has to deal with. Graffiti can range from anything, it can be something that could be considered a beautiful mural, a gang tag claiming territory for a particular gang, or just a personal tag someone decides to leave behind. In order to fully understand graffiti and the messages behind it, it is essential to know many facts involving graffiti. It is integral to know the time period when graffiti first showed up, how the intent or meaning of graffiti has changed, how graffiti is on a global scale, political messages behind graffiti, and finally how vandalism and graffiti are treated as crimes. With all these facts in mind, anyone will be able to comprehend graffiti on a deeper level

If you were to go open a dictionary and look up the definition of art, you would see that it has art as “The expression or application of human creative skill and imagination…” (“Art” 2017) and “Works produced by human creative skill and imagination.” (“Art” 2017). From these definitions, graffiti is art, yet in most cases, it’s considered vandalism because it is done without permission of the property. When graffiti is done in a designated place or with the permission of the property owner, then it can truly be considered art. But even if these circumstances are not met, if the graffiti goes beyond a simple tag, it is art.

By definition, graffiti is illegal. It is also considered vandalism because public or private property is intentionally destroyed, but in Alex Boyd’s blog “In Defense of Graffiti”, he clearly conveys his argument about how graffiti shows qualities of value and shouldn’t be criticized on impulse. Even though many people have seen graffiti as something to be condoned, punishable, and terrorizing, it is actually just another form of expression, communication, art, and point of view.

Is graffiti seen as vandalism or a notable art that is used to voice the opinion of many artists? Many are quick to conclude that graffiti is an act of defacing public property, but few are in understanding of what real graffiti is. Graffiti is defined as art that is displayed or created in public spaces. So this presents the question of why some critics believe that graffiti should not be classified as a real subcategory of art. Below is the explanation as to why graffiti needs to be considered among the most prestigious and notable art forms.

Most people think of graffiti as vandalism or the defacing of private property by wild teenagers with spray cans. I had never really thought about graffiti or art for that matter until I found myself defending something I didn’t know about because I liked what I saw on the sidewalk in Memphis, Tennessee. Now, that’s sounds crazy but I did my best to explain using simple words that I hoped they would understanding.

Graffiti portrays a message whether it’s spelled out on the concrete or hidden behind a sort of code. It lets unheard voices, be heard. There are many different forms of graffiti, tagging is the form of street art that most often results in consequences (Eickmier). This is because tagging is basically signing your nickname on a wall, and once the police figure out your pseudonym they will most likely find you. Graffiti is not always considered to be ugly though, some artists work actually ends up in museums (Wark) A manchester artist who goes by the name “Banksy” ultimately avoided jail because his work was deemed “artistic” He was later given an opportunity to showcase his work in a museum. Graffiti does not

Graffiti can be found everywhere and anywhere. It is a way for people to express themselves and be creative in a public manner. It shows how passionate and talented they can be when it comes to drawing or tagging and have it displayed as a piece of art for everyone to see. Graffiti goes way back to the ancient times and is now very well known in the modern days which makes more and more people interested and fascinated by them. It can be used in different types of ways. Many artists can either spray paint, carve, paste, or stencil them on a surface. From how we see them today they are usually images of random cartoons, big bubbly letters, vintage black and whites or inspirational quotes. Virtually anything colorful or not and big that can be easily spotted. Graffiti is more superior to be known as art than vandalism because it is a self expressing act. People need to be open minded about the images they see and look at the message behind it or else they will immediately criticize and say it is vandalizing property.

Although graffiti is a dynamic expression, it is also unacceptable and disastrous. Multiple schools understand defacement is sabotaging premise, it is not satisfying. Graffiti is something close to a dreadful description of just an amusing delightful smiley face.Just like it is to draw a horrible outrages, nasty words, or pictures. Graffiti is something no one should transcribe or undertake.

There’s a lot of controversy today on whether Graffiti is a good thing or not. Graffiti has been seen by many as a destruction of property, but it is a form of expression and an artistic thought that should be allowed, per the First Amendment, as freedom of speech and not as breaking the law. I personally believe that Graffiti should be legal. I don’t believe it harms anyone or anything depending on the location. I believe Graffiti has many issues that every individual looks at differently. I think that Graffiti is looked at as Vandalism because of the location that the artists decide to put them in, and even the image of the actual painting itself. There a many different forms of Graffiti, like Street Art and Subway Art. But most Graffiti problems become a problem because no one listens to the people’s opinions on location and how they feel about it being vandalism. There are many different views on Graffiti being an art or not and I am going to talk about those things today.

The first argument point is that graffiti can be beautiful. A famous street artist Nikita Nomerz travels around Russia with his project T he Living Wall, w here he brings old statues, walls, towers, and structures to life by putting graffiti on it. What he does is he puts eyes and facial features in his artwork in order for it to “come alive.” In my opinion artists like NIkita Nomerz love seeing their artwork display itself.

You can look on the internet and in a dictionary for the definition of art but in all reality, art is defined as something you see as art. To me, anything can be art. From building a sculpture or building, to even being an athlete. Being an athlete can be art because the person performs in his own way that is created by them. They have to create a form and a style to compete at the best of their abilities. There are many different types of art but when someone hears art, the first thing that comes to mind is a painting. But paintings do not have to be on a canvas. Think about the art on the side of traincarts you see, which is known as graffiti. But there is a problem when it comes to this type of art because there is a conflict in the art

Art: the ultimate form of self expression. But, what constitutes an art? And, who decides? These very questions plague society as it tries to decide and define the official status of graffiti--art or vandalism? Because it has found its way into art galleries and because of the community of artists who challenge and inspire each other, graffiti should be considered art and as a way to express oneself.

Graffiti has put a major impact on the way people look at their everyday life. It was not used so much here in the United States but was used overseas. Overseas, graffiti, or street art, was used or played as a sport, just like baseball is Americas sport. There are different laws that are put over there than what there are here. They can get away with some of the things that they paint or make over there. If we tried some of that type of work over here, we would get in trouble and possibly serve time for vandalizing someone else’s property. There are many biased outlooks on graffiti, but it should be considered art in all places because of all the time, effort, and design the artist put into their work.