What Is The Institutional Supremacy Of The Roman Empire

At the height of its power, Rome controlled the greatest empire ever seen in Europe at that time. Many of the conquered nations benefited from Rome. Roman public baths, roads, water supplies, all appeared in Western Europe. The sheer size of the empire was a major reason for the collapse of Rome. In AD 284, the Emperor Diocletian divided the Roman Empire in two parts to make it easier to rule. He created the Western Empire and the Eastern Empire, each with its own leader. Diocletian faced more than just administrative problems. More and

Western Europe triumphed from their princes and the Pope ruling since they soon overcame The Byzantine Empire. This was because having more than one ruler can hold together an empire or countries better than one ruler. The princes had control of the government in their areas, and the Pope had control of the entire religion in Western Europe. Having the Pope and the princes dealing with separate issues is better than having just one emperor deal with all of their issues. Another difference of the two halves of Europe was the monasteries and nunneries. Western Europe believed that they should have both priests and nuns teaching and preaching to other people. The Byzantine Empire did not feel that nuns were needed in their empire to preach and to teach other people. This was the most likely cause for the many people in the empire converting to their barbaric enemies religions. If The Byzantine Empire had used nuns to preach and teach their people, instead of having just priests and monasteries, the people would not have converted the their enemies. Hence, The Byzantine Empire, and Western Europe were greatly different than each other.

In fact Rome’s area was so large it was split into western and eastern empires with separate government and emperor for each territory. Rome covered most of Europe, most of North Africa, and some of Asia. That massive area created problems for the Roman Empire which led to the western and eastern split.

Rome was the world’s greatest place for about 500 years. The fall of the Roman Empire led Rome to split into two parts. The eastern part of Rome thrived much longer than the western half. Historians believe that Rome had not fallen until about 476 A.D. because of how long Eastern Rome survived as a Byzantine Empire. Western Rome had fallen after the split and when it did, a number of reasons are in the hundreds. They had decided to split their government due to the fact that they had so much land to cover that they thought it was easier to split the empire in half. There were three main reasons as to why Rome had fallen. The division of the Roman Empire lead to a weak economy, military as well as political and social problems.

Western Rome was first conquered by Odoacer who was a Germanic leader and he overthrew Romulus in 476 A.D. But the reason Odoacer was able to conquer Western Rome was because of the Decisions that the Emperor and Government made while ruling. One of the major reasons that Rome fell was because of overexpansion,which made the Empire harder to govern so Diocletian thought it would be a great idea to split the Empire into Two halves which were Western Rome and Byzantine but while it was good during the beginning the two Empires started arguing over military aid and resources but while this was happening the Byzantine Empire started to grow and become rich while the Western Roman Empire were becoming poor and the Byzantine Empire did not share the

During the 17th to 18th century, The Roman Empire had gone through a cultural and religious metamorphous. Throughout this time, the roles of religion in the Islamic, Byzantine and Western European worlds altered the period of 600-750 with their similarities adhering to monotheism for one, and differences in regards to perspectives. These three cultures were all pretty diverse but they also shared some of the same roots and became heritors of the Roman Empire, built on different ideologies. The different ideologies of the Islamic, Byzantine and Western European worlds, consisted of different founders, places, and elements of worship, thus portraying how religion was indeed prominently central to governmental and social structures because of the large impact towards political laws.

The development of christianity under the empire undoubtedly changed the relation between the political and spiritual spheres in following centuries. In fact, this transpires in how often emperors and empresses played dominant roles in the Eastern church after Constantine I's reign. In many

The Roman Empire was at its acme in 117 CE. It stretched from the Atlantic Ocean to the Euphrates River in the Middle East, but like the stock market, it crashed or fell. The empire would grow too vast to be ruled by solely the central government of Rome, so in 285 CE Emperor Diocletian divided the empire into a Western and an Eastern Empire. Each empire would have its own leaders. When speaking of the Fall of Rome, many only account the Western Empire. Some historians believe that this split alone was what caused Rome to fall. However, others believe that there are multiple factors that caused the fall of the Roman Empire. In fact, most classicists, those who study ancient Greek and Latin,

-Once the pope got authority over the whole Christian Church, there were problems with preachers in many eastern churches—which lead to a division of eastern and western churches.

Diocletian became Rome’s emperor in 284. He changed the leadership to a monarchy rather than democracy, and basically made himself dominus, or lord of the region. During his “reign” he divided the empire in half, the east and west regions. He then created the tetrarchy; lord (himself), an augustus, and two caesars. According to history the tetrarchy didn’t last long but the division of east and west

After the death of the Roman emperor Philip the Arab, Rome suffered through over three decades of ineffective rulers. A once powerful Roman Empire took substantial hits financially and militarily. All of this would change in 284 A.D. when man named Diocletian rose to power. Soon after taking the throne, Diocletian realized the Roman Empire was far too vast to be ruled by just one person, so in 285 A.D. he split the empire into eastern and western halves. Diocletian named his son-in-law, Maximian, the emperor of the eastern half of Rome and he remained the emperor of the western half. After the split, Diocletian made policies to restore the economy and military. He tried to restore order in the ruined economy by creating national budget that aimed at balancing expenses and revenues, responding to rising prices with an edict that fixed prices on thousands of commodities and services, and responding to soaring interest rates by fixing them to between six and twelve percent.

After the fall of Roman Empire in 476 c.e . three distinct cultures emerged: eastern continuation of the empire with the capital in Constantinople, Latin West with the variety of barbarian tribes and later Islamic World . Western part that I am going to discuss in this essay will become a powerful theocratic government with economy driven by feudalism and the renowned king as its leader. Christianity played a vital role in all aspects of the life: political, economical, and educational.

Constantine moved the capital to the East, which was the side he ruled from. This capital was called Byzantium, later renamed Constantinople. Diocletian then took over in the year of 284 A.D, and split the empire into two sides. He doubled the army and hired mercenaries, which were foreign soldiers who fought for money. Both were strong attempts to saving the empire,

In the year 330 Constantine founded a new imperial city in the east, which became known as Constantinople. Accompanying Diocletian's system of tetrarchy, the creation of this new city affirmed the separation of the Roman Empire into the east and the west. The Eastern Roman Empire held a series of advantages over the west both socially and economically. The Western Roman Empire was the weaker empire and a bad leadership and government along with attacks from barbarians led to the demise of the Western Roman Empire.

Since its collapse, historians have attempted to explain the struggle for power and control over both the Roman Republic and the Roman Empire that followed. To explain the complexities of the Roman Republic, the Empire, and their political complexities can be a daunting task. For nearly ten centuries Rome would rule most of the known world before the fall of the Western Empire (Byzantine) in 476 C.E. Before that fall occurred, a fundamental change would take place that would transform the original Republic into the Roman Empire. Many factors would be directly and indirectly responsible for this transition. These would