Before talking about Joseph Galloway’s Speech to the Continental Congress, it is necessary for me to explain in a simpler way what a primary source is. A primary source is a document, an image or an artifact that provides a direct or firsthand evidence about an event, a person, an object or a work of art. Hence, historical documents, speeches, published works, autobiographies and so on, are primary sources.
The Speech to the Continental Congress of 1744 is a discourse made by Joseph Galloway during the Continental Congress on the 28th September 1744. It is possible to read it on the Journals of the Continental Congress, 1774-1789: 1774.
After the end of the French and Indian War (1754-1763), Britain saw itself with enormous debts to pay and
…show more content…
Galloway argued that the Colonies had to take in consideration that every time something had threaten them, see the French and Indian War or the Canadian and Indians incursions, Britain had always been there to send support. But, despite Britain’s assistance, most of the Colonies in return, had given back only in portion to the approach or remoteness of the danger. So, when the British Parliament passed the Stamp Act in 1765, it was a legitimate operate according to Galloway. Moreover, when in response to the Stamp Act the Colonies had petitioned the British Parliament denying its authority, it was always appropriate for the British Parliament to pass other laws as the Declaratory Acts (1766) in order to maintain its supremacy over their possessions in the Americas. Galloway was visibly pro-Britain and, with the effort to make clear that a pacific solution was possible, he brought at the debate the supporters of the British Parliament’s ideas. One of it was that the discovery of the Colonies had been made by Britain, and therefore, Britain had the authority to rule over them. Furthermore, the Parliamentary jurisdiction had been constantly exercised over the Colonies from their first settlement, and so they had to be …show more content…
If historians were to only use primary sources from one perspective, they would lose the chance to know different point of views. Take into consideration Joseph Galloway’s Speech to the Continental Congress. It is clear that he is trying to persuade the colonists not to go against Britain. Now, this speech is a primary source because is a document that provides explicit information about an event. But, a couple of years later, Thomas Paine writes the pamphlet “Common Sense”, where he advocates the country to be independent from Britain. If historians were only to use Joseph Galloway’s primary source, they would never be able to know that not everyone was thinking the same way of him. In order to fully understand what is the cause or the causes that lead to different events in history, it is important to be familiar to every kind of document regarding that period. Read and analyze every prime source of that period to have a complete and neat vision of the
After winning the French and Indian war, Great Britain’s economy entered economic downturn, causing great strain on the ruling power.
The Treaty of Paris of 1763 marked the end of the French and Indian war. The Consequences of the war was France and its removal as a party from the world. Then the French were expelled to Canada and then they separated to smaller colonies. The war doubled Britain’s national debt, and then the debt was to be lightened by
In 1775 Patrick Henry gives his “Speech to the Virginia Convention,” in order to persuade the delegates to join the fight for independence against the british by using ethos, logos, and pathos.
Patrick Henry adresses the delegates at the Convention of Virginia (1776) in his speech titled, “Give me Liberty or Give me Death!” Henry develops his claim by speaking candidly with a dramatic tone. He strengthens his credibility through his use and application of a ceremonious diction, and his syntax perfectly fits the occasion. In the speech he hopes to induce delegates into seceding from Great Britain to take arms against the English.
At the beginning of Henry’s speech, he was aware of the fact that not every delegate supported his idea of fighting British rule; some wanted America to make peace and reconciliation with Britain. He politely acknowledged “different men often see the same subject in different lights”[5] and that his aim was to express his sentiments unreservedly regarding the debate on whether Americans should fight for their freedom or remain enslaved by the British rule. Henry hoped his fellow delegates would not see his sentiments as disrespectful. He also told his audience that they had a responsibility towards America and God to seek the truth and that if he held back his opinions for fear of offending others; he would be
This document is the transcript of a speech delivered by Thomas Morris Chester to an audience in Philadelphia in 1862. Based on the citation for the passage, we can assume that this version was the one published as a pamphlet.
Patrick Henry was an important figure in the times prior to the American Revolution, where he delivered many speeches. In his “Speech to the Virginia Convention”, Patrick Henry uses passionate diction, syntax, and figurative language in order to arouse American citizens to fight for their independence from Britain.
The impact of the French and Indian War on the British government was a positive move toward the dominance of Europe after the defeat of the French in terms of the colonization of North America. During this time, the British had incurred a massive military debt, which had to be paid over the long-term. To ensure that the British government did not take full responsibility for the debt, the British colonists were expected to pay back the debt burden through extremely high taxes. This policy was a major impact on the British because it defined a new era of colonial exploitation that was to be used against the colonists. During this time, the British government harbored resentment over the uncooperative attitude of some colonists that supported the French and refused to pay taxes to relieve the war debt:
With the end of all of the colonial wars in 1763, Britain faced an immense debt on top of a massive territory that needed to be protected and governed. A large piece of the new territory was previously populated by Native American and French enemies. In order to deal with theses problems which became increasingly worse with a post-war recession in England, Britain needed to raise money. British officials felt they could not tax British citizens more, as that may have created domestic unrest. They felt they could not raise trade regulations or tariffs too steeply, as that could have increased the possibility of smuggling.
Henry is perhaps best known for the speech he made in the House of Burgesses on March 23, 1775, urging that legislature to take military action against the encroaching British military force. The House was deeply divided, but was very much leaning toward not commiting troops. As Henry stood in Saint John's Church in Richmond, Virginia, he ended his speech with his most famous words;
One of the Founding Fathers of the United States, an orator, and a revolutionary leader, Patrick Henry, in his “Speech of the Virginia Convention,” engages the Virginia delegates into the war of England explaining that the longer they waited to take action, the harder it would be to win. Henry’s purpose is to convince the Virginia House of Burgesses to send their troops to aid the cause of the Revolutionary war and to also fight for independence. He adopts a passionate and dramatic tone in order to appeal to the emotions of the people of Virginia.
In 1775, Patrick Henry argues to the president and delegates of the Virginia Convention that the colonists should take up arms against the British. During this speech to the convention, Henry criticizes the leaders for ignoring the reality of the situation that the colonists are in, suggests that the previous methods of diplomacy have been ineffective, begs the convention to fight for their own freedom, and argues that the British did not want to negotiate. Henry is very urgent and confident with his remarks to the convention. Patrick Henry argues to the Virginia Convention that the colonists must fight the British due to many failed attempts at peace by discussing the potential danger they are in.
In the 1770’s, tensions between the colonies and Britain had been quickly escalating. Colonies like Massachusetts declared to be in a state of rebellion towards Britain. On March 23, 1775 in Virginia, a meeting of the colony’s delegates was held in St. John’s church in Richmond to decide if they should rebel against Britain as well. Patrick Henry presented resolutions to the meeting and delivered a speech in favor of his resolutions. “Speech to the Second Virginia Convention” by Patrick Henry uses diction and imagery to create a patriotic tone.
Speeches were a very relevant and monumental way of informing the people in the 1700’s. Famous figures such as Benjamin Franklin and Patrick Henry were only a few amongst these speech givers. Benjamin Franklin spoke of the Constitution and his opinion of it, while Patrick Henry projected his thoughts on allowing the Virginian militia to fight the British. Franklin and Henry had ideas, some more volatile than others, but similarities and differences are quite apparent within their speeches.
I learned numerous things from sourcing the document. First, the heading identified that it was from a primary source. Second, the title identified that it was a speech from the former president of the United States, Andrew Jackson, and his audience was the U.S. Congress, not the general public, so the document must have had some importance. Third, the date under the title, and the source at the end of the document identified what time period it had come from.