What Was The Purpose Of The Congress Of Vienna

Another hot topic of the Constitutional Convention was representation in Congress. Smaller states opposed the Virginia Plan to determine representation by populations, believing that they would be overpowered by the larger states. In response, they proposed the New Jersey Plan, which proposed representation equal to each state. A committee of eleven men stepped in and developed the Great

The purpose of this convention was to revise the Articles of Confederation and make them better. Every state was represented by sending delegates except for Rhode Island. They decided that it would be a better idea to draft a whole new constitution, so that’s what they did. Their plan was to construct a stronger federal government that included the three branches executive, legislative and judicial branch. They also agreed on a system of checks and balances to make sure that no individual branch had an excessive amount of power. Some other issues that were discussed during the Constitutional Convention were state representation and

Independence was not the issue at this meeting, rather the members in Congress sought to “right the wrongs” that the colonies had endured. Along with that redemption, the members of the First Continental Congress sought to gain a voice in London, something they were denied of.

During the Philadelphia convention, the Framers ran into many problems when talking about representation. Plans were proposed on how to run the government, including the Virginia and New Jersey Plan. These plans were centered on representation in Congress and how many houses there should be. The Virginia Plan proposed for Congress to be a bicameral legislature and for both houses to have proportional representation while the New Jersey Plan focused on having one house in Congress and have it be based on equal representation. This sparked disagreements when delegates from smaller states believed their voices would not be heard if the Virginia Plan became the outline for government, likewise delegates of larger states thought that in equal representation their voices would not be

Most conservative thoughts and viewpoints were expressed through the Congress of Vienna, which was a meeting of ambassadors of European states. The goal of the conservatives at this meeting was to reestablish peace and stability in Europe. Conservatives supported the political and social order, such as social hierarchy, that had existed before the French Revolution (Doc. 4). Therefore, they preferred the time period before 1789 because they benefited from the old regime (Doc. 7). The Congress of Vienna also sought to balance power and prevent future revolutions. However, they believed that natural rights and constitutional government could lead

The Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia was a secret meeting that took place between May and September of 1787. The reason of this meeting was to revise the Articles of Confederation. As well the problem from the Revolutionary War debt. The president of this convention was George Washington. Fifty four individuals attended which most of them were wealthy young persons who wanted to protect the economic of the state. The Constitution that arrived from the convention accepted a government with more limited powers, where each brand would check and balance the authority between the Judicial Executive and Legislative

The Constitutional Convention was held in May 25 1787 in Philadelphia to discuss revising the Article of Confederation. Delegates from the various states met in Philadelphia and George Washington president was elected to preside over Convention. However, the result of convention wasn’t likely what the purpose of convention to revise the Article of Confederation because what it ended up doing could not answer successfully the question of slavery and was creating a new constitution, which was the United States Constitution. There were three plans submitted for government structure which were Virginia, New Jersey, and Connecticut Compromise.

He would eventually bring these ideas in front of the committee to get the balance of congress and the president to try and achieve the same balance of power. The government that he was a proponent of was one that was very similar to that of the Brits but the one major change was that everything stayed internal to the government without any outside influences. The views of many of the for-fathers were as diverse as the areas of the country they came from. The convention provided a unique platform for all of the opposing views to bring their opinions, concerns and ideas to the table for discussion. The convention also allowed for the open sharing of ideas and somewhat of a melting pot for different theories and conjectures. Not only did this format allow for the representatives of their idea to voice and present them but it also allowed for those opposed to object and state their reasons why.

The First Continental Congress was called into session in 1774. The Congress did not encourage independence. Instead, they wanted to show England how to fix the wrongs that had been imposed on the colonists. They hoped that this would unify the colonies and grant them a voice in parliament. The congress wrote the Declaration of Rights and Grievances, which consisted of American complaints that they addressed to the King. The delegates stayed loyal to King George III and made it clear that they were anymore for Parliament.

The Second Continental Congress met in Philadelphia. The men who attended were, for the most part, the same men who had appeared in the first Continental Congress. “The Adamses and the Livingstons, Thomas Jefferson, John Hancock, Peyton Randolph, Jay Henry, Washington, and Lee were there, as also Franklin” (Fiske 132). The objectives of Congress were better understood in the Second Continental Congress, so more was accomplished (Burnett 65). The main goal of the Second Continental Congress was to restore harmony between Great Britain and the Colonies. Ideas that sprang from this were the establishment of rights and liberties, the repeal of the acts that Britain placed on the colonies, and the establishment of peace, welfare, and security in the colonies.

-Thesis: This Essay is mainly of how the Second Continental Congress was more significant to Revolutionary War.

The Federalist Massachusetts legislature were the ones who called the meeting to discuss “public grievances and concerns”. (Pg. 307). Delegates came mostly from Massachusetts, Connecticut, Rhode Island legislatures, and they discussed what to do. The convention had some people who advised amending the Constitution by taking power away from Congress. The people who had mentioned amending the Constitution did not want Congress to be able to declare war. The others whom did not agree with the notion suggested a peace with England. (pg.

The 1787 Philadelphia Constitutional Convention involved an extensive amount of compromise among the delegates in order to finalize the U.S. Constitution into the structure that it is known for today. On one end of the spectrum were states' righters, or Antifederalists, who were often delegates from smaller states such as Connecticut, and who sought to scale back the power of the federal government. On the other end of the spectrum were the Federalists, who wanted a strong national government to unite the nation. Additionally, there were other delegates who could not be put into such clear-cut categories. What followed at the convention was the process of compromise: a group of men with different ideas about how government should be structured,

Following the Revolutionary War, the colonies sent delegates to the Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia. In attendance at this convention were fifty-five delegates from all 13 colonies few of these men were of ordinary means. These delegates had different views on what should happen with slavery, how congress would be set up, and with the act of election. Those in attendance compromised on all of these issues in ways different that were considered best for all the colonies.

Early in the meeting there are a number of objections to the methods of the debate and to deviations from existing laws and protocols for handling the Jewish Question. Notable objection came from Stuckart who fully understood the legal ramifications the Reich who be facing and Kritzinger who had received personal guarantees that extermination of the Jews was not being considered. Soon it became apparent that the meeting was less of a conference to negotiate and plan, than to establish new laws and clear lines of authority with the SS in control.