preview

What Went Wrong Analysis

Decent Essays

“After thirty years of feminism, I look at the society in which I live. What has gone wrong? I ask myself. Though I wouldn't want to return to the situation women were placed in before this current feminist movement, it is also clear to me that many conditions of our lives have gotten worse, not better, since the onset of feminism,” (Gross np). From the words of Rita M. Gross in “What Went Wrong? Feminism and Freedom from the Prison of Gender Roles” featured in Cross Currents, the way feminism has evolved is a problem in which a new focus for feminism is needed for our generation to prosper. With the rise in modern feminism views and active protests, we, as a society, should not focus on defining equality among the sexes, but rather embrace …show more content…

Clearly, my proposed definition of feminism is gender neutral and pertains to men as much as it does to women, but that vision has not been pursued in the same way by men as it has by women,” (Gross np). As Gross proposes, most feminist fighting is not worth it. All the pain and suffering from attempting to achieve true equality is not worth the effort and sacrifice. Additionally, Gross points out that, “if any one person is not free, then no one is free, that individual liberation is impossible. Either women and men are both free of the prison of gender roles or neither is free,” (Gross np). This realization dooms feminism to hypocrisy. If feminists believe so much in fighting for equality, then they must also consider all the factors and instances in which men are not created equal. As Gross would say, “…individual liberation is impossible,” (Gross np). It is not possible to offer everyone on the face of the earth equality because we were never born equal. We may be offered the same opportunities in one nation that may not be offered in a poverty-stricken nation. Therefore, one soul offered one opportunity cannot simply have the same equal opportunity as another born across the …show more content…

She continued on with precise detail by saying, “Because the course centered on the question ‘Is feminism dead?’ and used that question as a springboard for the exploration of non-Western feminisms, when designing the course I began by giving students a brief review of the history of U.S. feminisms,” (Masterson 121).
A problem does not exist when professors define feminism to their undergraduate students. The problem arises when women have the idea that feminism protests are the only way for change to occur. “Giving students this reference point from the beginning was not to provide students with the assumption that U.S. feminism is the feminism from which all other feminisms (including transnational feminisms) arose and to which they must be compared, but rather to set this history up as a dominant narrative that needs to be challenged and decentered,” (Masterson 122). “I also wanted to challenge the dominance of U.S. feminisms and Western feminist frameworks early in the semester,” Masterson later commented on her summary of her course (Masterson 123). Masterson’s main goal was for her students to, “…learn to see past the dominant narrative of feminism as a U.S.-centric movement in order to begin to consider how women’s experiences and encounters with feminism must be geographically, historically, and materially

Get Access