preview

White Ecotheology

Decent Essays

Christianity’s teaching in the Book of Genesis that God gave humans dominion over the Earth planted the seeds that led to environmental destruction centuries later. This innovative view from historian Lynn White in 1967 set off a furious debate over the Christian religion’s responsibility for many environmental crises plaguing the Earth today. While the research lays much of the blame at the feet of Christian-based ideas, some scholars also identify other culprits who have contributed to the environmental crises. Whether they shoulder some or most of the responsibility, Christians seem to be engaging in a period of more humble self-reflection. Today, groups employ religion to plant different ideas that they hope will transform the view …show more content…

Author Whitney Bauman posits that White’s essay marks the starting point of the field of ecotheology or “Religion and Ecology” (Bauman, 425). Bauman divides the criticism of White into three categories: apologetic, constructive/critical, and sympathetic (Bauman, 425).
The apologetic response comes mostly from religious scholars who defend Christianity and reject White’s premise that Genesis sets up humans to dominate the world (Bauman, 425). These scholars believe that White caricatures Christianity and that rather than giving humans a mandate to dominate the world, the Bible’s message is one of stewardship (Bauman, 425). The apologetic response also equally blames the environmental crises on science, secularism and consumerism (Bauman, …show more content…

Scholar Rosemary Ruether’s analysis of White’s thesis seems to be a combination of all three: apologetic, constructive/critical and sympathetic. Ruether reviewed the development of Christianity through history and concluded that the Christian belief in redemption into another world cannot be entirely blamed for leading Christians to neglect and abuse the environment (Ruether, 464). However, she also concluded that White’s thesis was mostly correct (Ruether, 464-65). Yet, Ruether’s analysis also points to the industrial revolution and exploitation of nature for the sake of economics or consumerism as additional perpetrators of environmental destruction (Ruether, 464-65). According to Ruether, Christianity, as well as Judaism and Islam, all have important insights that can help the planet avert disaster (Ruether, 466). However, Ruether believes that religions must accept the belief that humans do not have absolute power over nature (Ruether, 466), which would mean rejecting their Genesis-based mandate of “dominion” over the Earth. Similarly, religious persons must stop the Western world’s abuse of the environment that damages not only nature but harms other humans (Ruether,

Get Access