As a single mom the constant never ending argument in our house is who gets to ride “shotgun”. Every car ride is begun the primal grunt of a 9 and 12 year old to obtain the covet set, the length of the ride does not matter it is the seat that gains the rider ultimate status for the short or the long ride and the single mom a headache if perchance the grunts happen simultaneously and she is the must take on the challenge of being referee. On the surface you would think how this could possibly be an academic arguments, while I am sure that Ivy League Professors would never present a paper on who get to ride “shotgun”, I believe that to illustrate necessary elements that are required for creating an academic argument. It is sample enough to …show more content…
The first reason already stated, the second is she is older and therefore always remembers to call shotgun, third she is physically bigger and therefore the fear surrounding airbag injuries is less, 4th she is 12 and handles herself better in the front seat and is less distracting to the already nervous driver. The explanations is used to make explicit the connection that exist between your agreements claims and ground. In this argument I believe that the connection to my claim and ground is self-evident, the 12 year old is obviously older and more mature than the 9 years old this make her a better choice to sit in the front seat, her height, weight and age enable her to ride in the front seat safely without the risk of injury from the air bags. The next component of the argument is the qualification. Here is where I ask myself is this really the safest or best option. If I am being honest no, the safest would be that they both ride in the back seat however that argument has long since been dismissed as there are no laws explicit to Oregon that children have to ride in the back seat when they are out of car seats. However it is “suggested” that they ride in the back until they are 12 year old or they reach the 4’9” height requirement to ride in the
Christie Maliepaard shares her story to encourage all drivers and passengers to wear a seat belt at all times in a car. Unfortunately, her daughter, was not wearing her seat belt and was involved in a disabling car crash that eventually led to
| Demonstrates solid understanding of the concept of reasoning fallacies and identifies the most important fallacies in the argument by name and discusses their
Such contentions are utilized as a part of law courts each day to reason from fortuitous proof to a conclusion. The arguments are based on the hypothesis that is well thought of, explained and illustrated to reach on the conclusion.
“Are there rival causes?” (p. 128) This question helps evaluate an argument’s strength by examining any other reasonable causes
This analysis is set to discuss a letter written by Gordon Adams. He is a student at Arizona State University and wants to become a lawyer. However, he finds he must take mathematics courses, specifically college algebra, to graduate and move on into law school. He claims that he does not need to take college algebra because he does not need it in his profession and because if he takes the course, it will delay him into law school. We follow him through his endeavor with ASU's mathematics committee to try to waive his requirement for college algebra. However, he fails at this task and, with every argument, you can't always get what you want in return. Rhetorically, I think his argument to the committee is a good way to write an argument, at least in my opinion.
In this article titled “Analyzing Arguments: Those You Read and Those You Write” goes over multiple strategies and examples to help you analyze the meaning and purpose of a specific argument and how to strengthen your own.
Risk for trauma related to misuse of seat restraints and physical proximity to vehicle pathways.
In today’s society, and even generations before us, kids safety is very important. Also, traveling in an automobile is
Starting out as young driver would be better for several reasons. With the ability to start driving at a young age you could take yourself or others such as younger siblings or friends to school. Or to after school events such as practice or games. Both would put less stress on the parents or guardians. Even going to pick up groceries would help families everywhere. If the needed age was raised, by the time they got their license they would be moved out or in the process of moving out of the
The evidence showed that the sale was made between P and D and not one of the adults. D was fully aware of P’s age when the sale was negotiated and P had every right to disaffirm the sale. D had the burden to show that the car was a necessity and D did not meet that burden.
Mangan, K. (2015, October 23). A University Debates How to Carry Out a Divisive Guns-on-Campus Law. Chronicle of Higher Education. p. 1.
Many people believe that 16 is much too young of an age for people to receive their driving license. While it is true that younger drivers are generally more dangerous on the road than other age groups, raising the age limit to obtain a driver's license will not assist in solving that issue. There are several things that teenagers do that require them being able to drive in order to do them. Kids being able to drive at the age of 16 may take some immediate stress off their parents shoulders by giving them some quiet time, and is it also an incentive for teenagers to be more social. Many teenagers also have jobs at the age of 16, and some go straight into the workforce after graduating at 17 or 18 years of age.
Some people say that 13 year olds should drive. Well look at it this way. If you have a son that just turned 13 driving a car it is already scary enough that a 16 year old is driving. Then why put a 13 or 14 year old in the driver seat to drive on
The ability to take driver’s education at 14 instead of 15 allows the child to learn how to become more responsible at a younger age. Since you can get
The level of precautions used when driving is based on an individual’s skills and mind set, not on their age. However, car insurance companies do not view it this way. They assume that due to their age, young drivers will not pay attentions to what they are doing and are more likely to get distracted by friends, music, or cell phones than their older counterparts would be.