Monster
Steve Harmon is the main character in the book Monster. Steve is on trial for his part in the murder of Mr. Nesbitt. Mr. Harmon struggles throughout this process trying to figure out who he really is. He also attempts to convince himself that he did not do anything wrong. Steve is a seventeen-year-old high school student that loves film class. He uses his knowledge of film to write a movie script based on his time in prison and his trial. The script is named Monster. Steve Harmon is wrongly found innocent in the trial for the murder of Mr. Nesbitt. There is a large stock of evidence that can be used to prove that the jury made a mistake. The young man had knowledge of a crime that resulted in an innocent mans death and he should be punished for it. Steve states in the book that he discussed the robbery with King and Peaches. Steve admits that he had knowledge of the robbery. Steve’s Alibi doesn’t hold much ground either.
…show more content…
Nesbitt. Osvaldo Cruz, James King and Bobo Evans all testified that Steve had a part in the crime. Evans stated that he say Steve exit the store and both King and Cruz admitted that he was in on the robbery. In a flash back that Steve has, he explains how James King, Peaches, and himself planned and discussed the robbery while sitting outside their apartment buildings in their neighborhood. Numerous people stated that he either took part in the robbery or was at the scene of the crime shortly before the robbery.
Secondly, Steve’s alibi has no strength to it. He states that he was in his neighborhood taking mental notes for a school project during the time of the crime. There is not a single person that is able to back up his claim. It is impossible for anyone to know whether this statement is indeed true or not. Cruz, King, and Evans all three state that Steve took part and was at the scene of the crime shortly before the time of the
First Steve and Mrs.Petrocelli said “ I don’t remember seeing him play ball” “you having trouble remembering what you’ve seen.” (Myers 226). Steve is using a tactic which he said he doesn’t remember something and nobody can disprove that because it’s his memory. Then in the jail inmate number two states “Nah! truth is something you gave up when you were out there on the street. Now you are talking survival” (Myers 226). This demonstrates my theme because the criminal is saying nobody will tell the truth, they will just look for ways to lie to get out of trouble. Steve is a very smart person as he is only saying the bare minimum as to not say any facts to show that he is guilty. The truth is gone all you have left now is
The young man accused of the terrible crime was a bug-eyed boy with a bowl haircut who came from a broken home and attended at least seven schools in nine years. Many afternoons, he would sit silently on the curb in front of his roomy yard and, when he tired of it, move to a different curb. He helped neighbors with their yard work, but they still found him strange.
Being truthful comes with a considerable amount of strings, but being true to oneself is what truly matters. As shown in Monster by Walter Dean Myers, the text proposes a plot about a boy-- Steve Harmon and James King-- who is on trial for felony murder. Throughout the book, Harmons thoughts are displayed through diary entries; how others perceive Harmon is exhibited through a movie layout. The jury will have to decide whether Harmon and King are guilty or not, so, as the trial gets more complex, the self-doubt becomes more immense; exemplifying the ideal realization that being truthful to oneself is a substantial part of life.
James Driskell is a Canadian man born in 1959. In 1991, he was wrongfully convicted for the murder of his friend, Perry Harder. Prior to the murder, the two of them ran a "chop shop" together, where they would disassemble stolen vehicles and sell the parts and materials off for money. The chop shop was discovered by authorities in 1989, and the two were promptly arrested on several charges. The prosecution offered a plea deal to Perry. If he admitted guilt to some of his charges, he would receive a lightened sentence, and James would not be prosecuted afterwards. When the day of the trial came, Perry was not present, and authorities could not locate him. Three months later, Perry's body was discovered, the cause of death being two gunshots to the chest.
In society there are people who commit crimes or someone could just be the lookout. In the book Monster Steve has been accused of being the lookout for a robbery and murder of Mr. Nesbitt. Steve then goes to trial and fights for his life. Steve was not the lookout for the robbery nor was he responsible for Mr. Nesbitt’s death.
People who have read the novel, Monster are supposed to believe that Steve is innocent, but throughout the whole novel, Steve drops subtle hints that he might not be as innocent as he wants us to believe. Steve Harmon is a 16-year old teenager that loves movies and screenplays and wants to make a movie out of his current situation, being on trial for murder.
It’s because the people who live in this world do not care about others or themselves. Just like in the book Monster. Monster is a book about a young boy who was hanging around the wrong people and ended up being charged with murder. The boy’s name is this book is Steve Harmon.
James King is guilty and should suffer for his actions. “Mr. King’s attorney wants to distance Mr. King from the murder by attacking the character of the State’s witnesses. But the fact of the matter is that Mr. Evans is an associate of Mr. King” ( ). Mr. King is a long time friend of Bobo Evans who accuses him of shooting the gun, even if he did not he is part of the crime. Lorelle Henry a witness identified Mr. King as one of the two men she witnessed in the store. “We have three witnesses to the fact that James King was in the store on the 22nd of December: Mr. Evans, Mr. Cruz, and Ms. Henry” ( ).
In the afternoon of December 22, a robbery had taken place at a drugstore. Alguinaldo Nesbitt was the owner of the drugstore. Sixteen year old Steve Harmon is black, he was the lookout to start a robbery at a drugstore. He was to go in and investigate the place to see if there were any policemen around. Although he didn’t want to do it, yet he did it anyway. Even though, he was afraid of Bobo Evans. He was afraid that if he didn’t do it that he would be gang rapped. However, he had failed to look out, because there was a young lady in the drugstore. It was clear, they went with no weapons, just muscle. Mr. Nesbitt the owner of the drugstore had pulled out a chrome, that’s what the gang members had called the gun. The three other men, had fought
The story is told through the perspective of Steve Harmon who is on trial for felony murder in the state of New York. The book begins with Steve Harmon leaving the Manhattan Detention Center to go to his first trial. The story goes on to his defense attorney briefing him on everything that will go on in the court room. The trial begins with Jose Delgado (the drugstore clerk) being questioned about the hold up. Salvatore Zinzi then is called to the stand to discuss the information he heard from a fellow inmate during his time on Riker’s Island. On the second day of the trial they bring in the detective to give his testimony and talks about how he gathered his evidence. Osvaldo Cruz (one of the criminals)
If I was the prosecutor during the case of James Earl Ray, I believe I could have won, the case against James Earl Ray. I would have taken the same approach as the prosecutor at that time and based on case mainly on Ray’s Guilty Plea. My second strategy would have been placing Ray at the scene of the crime in which Ray admitted he was present. My third strategy would be linking Ray to the bundle of items left at the crime scene. Again, he admitted that he was the owner of the bundle of items. My Fourth strategy would be to present character witnesses who could testify Ray was a well-known racist. My fifth strategy would be placing Ray car at the scene of the crime. My sixth strategy I would be to use Ray’s past criminal history against him.
Steven Avery, a family man, a victim of injustice and an accused murderer. One may have reasoned that his murder conviction was a crime of passion, due to the injustice Steven suffered from his 1985 false conviction of rape and assault, but that may have been before his story caught national attention. A documentary, “Making a Murderer”, directed by Laura Ricciardi and Moira Demos, arose from his story’s infamy. With this documentary came numerous questions as to Avery’s possible innocence, but above all else answers that shed light on a possibly corrupt justice system that appears intent on framing Steven Avery for Teresa Halbach’s murder. “Making a Murderer” effectively portrays a message of the injustice of Steven Avery’s murder conviction and possible corruption within the Manitowoc’s justice system through the use of footage and accounts from people who were involved with his conviction.
The book Monster is about a sixteen year old boy named Steve he is put through a trial for being accused of being a part in the murder of Mr. Nesbitt and robbery of a drug store the book leads you to your own opinion to think whether he was guilty or innocent. in my opinion I believe he is innocent because he was not present at the time of the murder he was found guilty at the trial he is a good kid.
Finding the truth of what happened on the night of the murder is critical to Mr. Davis. First, he forces the jury to look at the murder weapon. It is a switch knife with a pattern on the handle. According to the store owner, he sold a knife to the 18 year
Throughout the cold case I learned many life and career lessons, not all criminals are who you think they are, sometimes the main suspect may not be guilty, and that this case clearly had many ups and downs and that maybe if technology was more advanced when the vile and tragic murders happened they may have been solved thirty years ago. Towards the end of the case we learned that the main suspect; Jay Bass was actually an innocent man who didn’t get justice until thirty years of fighting to clear his name. We later found out that the actual culprit was the notorious Steve Bronson who was no virgin to the justice system. But Steve being convicted surprised me most because all the evidence collected never pointed to another suspect besides Jay