Accounting Research Center, Booth School of Business, University of Chicago
Why Do Audits Fail? Evidence from Lincoln Savings and Loan
Author(s): Merle Erickson, Brian W. Mayhew, William L. Felix, Jr.
Reviewed work(s):
Source: Journal of Accounting Research, Vol. 38, No. 1 (Spring, 2000), pp. 165-194
Published by: Blackwell Publishing on behalf of Accounting Research Center, Booth School of Business,
University of Chicago
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2672927 .
Accessed: 30/01/2012 17:52
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and
…show more content…
In spite of objections from the audit firms ' legal counsel, U.S. District Judge Richard Bilby released to the public deposition transcripts and associated audit working papers from the civil litigation against the former auditors of LSL.2 We use these documents as the basis for our analysis. To our knowledge, this is the first study to examine audit procedures documented in depositions and working papers from litigation over the adequacy of an auditor 's performance.
Prior research has been unable to review actual audit procedures applied to transactions from an alleged audit failure.3 Our access to LSL 's auditor 's depositions and workpapers enables us to evaluate the audit procedures that were applied by LSL 's auditors and the information they used. More importantly, we are able to identify the information that was not used and procedures that were not performed. Other researchers have been unable to study audit procedures associated with audit failures, in spite of the compelling importance of such an inquiry, using traditional research methods.4 Our ability to study these issues highlights the potential value of a detailed analysis of legal documents from a single case.
Moreover, the current approach enables us to generate alternative pro-
2 "Bilby said concerns relating to possible embarrassment from disclosure of someone 's deposition testimony 'is
An implicit theme of this case that I want students to recognize is the contrast between the persistent and vigorous efforts of David Sokol to “get to the bottom” of the suspicious items he uncovered in JWP’s accounting records versus what Judge William Conner referred to as the “spinelessness” of JWP’s auditors. The JWP audits were similar to most problem audits in that the auditors encountered numerous red flags and questionable entries in the client’s accounting records but, for whatever reason, apparently failed to thoroughly investigate those items. On the other hand, Sokol refused to be deterred in his investigation of the troubling accounting issues that he discovered. The relationships that existed between members of JWP’s accounting staff and the Ernst & Young audit team apparently influenced the outcome of the JWP audits. Of course, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at .
This research paper is being submitted on March 10, 2013, for Tiffany Krogman, A340/ACG3085 Section 03, Advanced Auditing Concepts & Standards.
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at .
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp
They are not legally bound to investigate; however, it only makes sense to investigate to ensure there is no impropriety. This report helps the auditors to dig deeper into the information concerning the Repo 105 transactions.
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at .
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/about/terms.html. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use. Please
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at .
As a way of increasing awareness of possible fraud, SAS No. 82 - “Consideration of Fraud in a Financial Statement Audit”, was issued in 1997 (Riahi-Belkaoui, and Picur 34). This SAS does not modify the basic ARM, but it expands on the guidance for the auditor’s consideration of material fraud in conducting financial statement audits. The SAS increases an auditor’s ability to detect fraud in an organization.
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at .
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.