The author’s purpose for writing this book is to entertain the readers with a plot that is thrilling and unexpected. It is also used to appeal to those who are interested and are fans of crime, like Criminal Minds. The novel is not just placed in a normal school or house setting. After Cassie Hobbes, the main character, decided to join the Naturals program, she was to live in the base of operations, a place where there is “a series of framed pictures lining the staircase… [in which] the people in the pictures [are] serial killers” (58). The pool at the house is even “one of the fake crime scenes [used] to test [the teenagers], like the sets in the basement” (97). With clues leading to many different suspects, the UNSUB is unpredictable for …show more content…
Those who are part of the Naturals program are also usually teenagers since “‘[n]atural aptitudes...peak in the teen years… [The program] has the potential to turn Naturals--people like [Cassie]--into something truly extraordinary” (29). The readers who are young adults would be able to understand the lifestyles of these Naturals even more than adults. In the novel, as well, there are many descriptions of how Lia, Michael, Dean, Sloane, and Cassie, the Naturals, live in the base of operations. Of course, the plot would also appeal to those who are fans of crime considering it revolves around the FBI and the Naturals figuring out active and cold …show more content…
I really appreciated the plot twist at the end because although I knew that the UNSUB would be someone close to Cassie, I didn’t actually pinpoint it at Agent Locke. It surprised even more when she revealed that she was actually Lorelai Hobbes’s little sister. The book being written in 1st person, through Cassie’s perspective, really helped with having the readers feel they are also figuring out the cases with her. I could feel like the thrill from this point of view. For even more suspense, there’s still the unanswered question about how Cassie “was still no closer to finding the monster who’d actually killed her” (304). The only downside to this novel is that I wasn’t particularly into the exposition. The first couple pages didn’t interest me to the point where I would not want to stop reading the book. However, the climax did change the
Serial killers, we have all heard of them and most of us are petrified of them. They commit horrendous crimes that many people cannot even begin to wrap their head around. Unfortunately, for those of us who are afraid of them it is likely we have encountered at least one if not multiple in our lifetime. That last sentence really puts the “be nice to everyone” quote into perspective, doesn’t it? It is not known how many serial killers are actually walking around among us however most studies conducted reviled we may not want the answer. Chances are the number is higher than we would have thought and definitely higher than we had hoped. Although I highly doubt we will ever get an actual number. It is not likely that a survey will be given to see how many serial killers are actually walking free. Even if this hypothetical survey was given I do not think an actual serial killer is going to put a checkmark in the are you a serial killer box. Although if they did mark the box they would save a lot of lives. Answering yes to such a question would land them in a psych ward. We may not know how to identify a serial killer simply by looking them up and down but we do have theories that help predict why they choose to commit unspeakable crimes. One of these theories that will be discussed is the biosocial theory. Throughout the report, the biosocial theory of crime will be thoroughly explained and applied to this topic to better understand serial killers. Anyone who has some time to
One may argue that this book was too long and partly too descriptive in both the storyline and the characters, which made it hard to follow the storyline throughout the book.
There are many theories as to why people become serial killers. Almost all of these concepts are associated with the Nature vs. Nurture theory. Are serial killers born with the need to kill, or is it something that they learn to long for as they grew up? Many believe that the nurture theory is the likely concept to believe; that serial killers are created from bad childhood experiences including being abused by their parents, or molested at an early age. Psychologist and sociologist have interviewed serial killers and picked apart their minds, to find out what it is that makes them feel the need to perform these heinous crimes. It is the nature theory that they are looking for when
I did actually really like this book. I was not sure if I was going to enjoy it when the project was first assigned, but after reading for a while, I became really interested
For the most part, the novel was very enjoyable. One aspect of it that I loved was that the storyline was extremely intense, which always compelled me to find out what would happen next. For example,
Seventeen. Seventeen men and boys who never got the opportunity to have a future. Seventeen families who grieved and lost hours of sleep, waiting on their son, brother, or friend to come home but never would. Seventeen young lives taken by one of the most infamous serial killers in the history of the United States; Jeffrey Lionel Dahmer. Jeffrey Dahmer was much more than a murderer; he raped, ate, and sometimes preserved certain body parts of his victims. But, why? What drove this man to commit such gory and violent crimes? As a child, Dahmer experienced severe negligence by his parents. His mother was a stay-at-home mom (and psychologically ill) and his father was a student at Marquette University. Jeffery’s father traveled for his studies and was never in the household. This engendered his mother’s desire for her husband’s affection but never received it due to his absence. The problems that existed between them provoked a lack of the childhood care that young Jeffery needed. He was often lonely and excluded himself from people. As a child, Dahmer had an extreme and odd fascination in the dismemberment of animals. His parents never gave it much attention and thought this interest was very normal. This was only the beginning of Jeffery’s anatomic study of dead beings. Dahmer may seem like a complete psychopath and indeed he was, but he is only one of thousands of serial
Serial killers have always fascinated society because no one knows how they come to be. People tend to think that being a psychopath is the same as being a serial killer. The acts committed by serial killers are too heinous and horrifying for a normal person to understand. Which is where one of the theories of how serial killers came to be came from. Nature vs. Nurture has been a topic of debate when it comes to serial killers for centuries. The debate is about whether genetics or environment factors determine the behavior and personality of a person. Just like hair color is determined by genetics, Those who argue genetics are the main factor in behaviour believe that genetic determines a person’s ability to take life without guilt or remorse. Those who are the believers of nurture side disagrees by stating that environmental factors like family, faith, and society regulate one’s capability to take life without remorse. Society needs to refrain from thinking that serial killers are born because they are made through psychological trauma caused by abuse at an early age or brain damage.
The characters bring a riveting story to life when reading. Throughout the book, I felt emotions left and right for the characters and what they were going through. There is a lot of mystery and questioning that will be answered later in the book, but once its done, there are still many questions being asked. when I look for a book, that is something that stands out to me because I really want to read more, and when you have that reaction to a book, that means it was worth reading. I found this book remarkable because of the behaviors, characteristics, and decisions that the characters make, and I recommend this book to everyone, even if they don’t like to
I don’t really recommend this book to anyone and I have a few reasons why. One reason is because I felt that there was too much going on in the book and it was very confusing. Another reason is because the book is very long and takes a lot of pages (more than half the book) to get started. My last reason is if the book is too hard and confusing to you, you can't even look up summary notes on the book because there's nothing on it.
Nature versus nurture is an ongoing debate on whether people are born with a wickedness that causes them to commit crimes, or if the surrounding environment of their early life causes them to become evil. People are born with an unrighteousness that is the root of their iniquity, this natural evil comes from their genetics. Psychologists that have studied serial killers find that they often times have no vendetta, and are simply committing these acts because they have some outlandish desire to hurt others. These killers are not like a normal murderers, “serial killers are driven by the instinct from within and their desire to kill” (Fox 102). Serial killers do not commit the crimes because of the natural desire that comes from a natural flaw in the person’s genetics and chemical imbalances in the brain.
I found this novel to be was just as enjoyable, if not more, than the first. Even though things began to become too convenient near the end, this
What drives a serial killer to commit crimes can either be explained through heredity as a means of inheriting a mental disorder or that their upbringing and environment is to blame for shaping a person into a murderer. Nature is defined by most people as the genetic make-up of a person; for example, health issues, mental disorders, may run in a family. On the other hand, nurture deals with a person’s environment, and how a person was raised; for example, an abusive husband beats his wife maybe because he grew up witnessing his father doing the same thing. Holmes and DeBurger note, “According to most researchers, the serial killer is a sociopath (or antisocial personality), which reflects a disorder of character or personality rather than of
However, despite the ostensibly interesting plotline, the book is not that enjoyable. The book seemed as if it had such a captivating premise when I discovered it,
Do you think serial killers were born “bad”? Do you think the society that they live in affects their actions? Medically a serial killer is defined as a person who kills a number of people over a long period of time. No matter when, serial killers where spread all around the world in different countries and I different societies. However, most serial killers shared common characteristics among themselves.
Introduction: This investigation examines the biological causes for serial killers’ psychopathic tendencies and examines those same biological factors in both men and women to find the correlation between a higher rate of male serial killers and the biology behind their actions. It is imperitave to first know what a serial killer is, and what makes them such a cold fish. There are sections of the brain that do have control over a human being’s personality, where that individual can either develop into an average person or join the other one percent of psychopaths living in the world today (due to physical damage or chemical imbalance in the brain). These specific sections of the brain are different in males then in females, some components of the brain vary in size etc. between sexes. It is crucial to have all these pieces, with this information its then possible to form a conlusion to the surfaced question.