preview

Why Funding For Nih Should Continue

Better Essays

Why funding for NIH should continue, and corrections to Dr. Not A Scientist’s scientific knowledge
April 17, 2017
By: Hena Arel Ahmed-Said

While it is accurate that the budget proposal by President Trump included cuts to programs such as the National Institute of Health (NIH) budget,8 there are many discrepancies in Dr. Not A. Scientist’s (Dr. N.A.S) article which I will be addressing. As stated in Dr. N.A.S’s op-ed, one of NIH’s goal is to utilize research and scientific resources in order to improve the health of Americans.8 Since we are using taxpayer dollars to fund such programs, it should be up to American citizens to direct where these funds are allocated. Transmission of infectious diseases is always a risk when globalization is …show more content…

Dr. N.A.S states that one of the antiretrovirals blocks translation of RNA into the proteins required to make new viruses. Some of the current antiretrovirals include reverse transcriptase, fusion and entry, protease, and integrase inhibitors;6,10 however there is not an inhibitor that blocks translation of rna into proteins on the market. Targeting inhibitors specific to HIV has made ARVs increasingly effective and less harmful to humans.

As stated by Dr. N.A.S, finding a vaccine has been incredibly challenging due to the astonishing genetic diversity of the virus. While it is true that the genome of two HIV infected individuals can differ by up to 30%,6 it is not the integrase enzyme that causes this huge difference in the genomes as written by Dr. N.A.S. Reverse transcriptase is the error prone enzyme that makes multiple mistakes while copying RNA into DNA, which results in ~1 mutation in every new virus.6 The advantage of mutations for HIV is that these new changes are not

Get Access