preview

Why Is Animal Testing Bad

Decent Essays

Good vs Bad: Animal Testing
Genesis 1:26: “And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness: and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth.” Biblically animals should serve man but organizations like (Peta) disagree. Animal testing on ostracized species should be one for medical advances only as human as possible.
First and foremost, medical advances are useful because they can save a human's life. Some people argue that they may have human emotions and it is cruel. Animal rights advocates contend that medical testing projects that use animal are needlessly cruel and old fashioned and can cause their subjects much pain (Mack 44). Animals do feel pain and may not like it. However, it will always be better to test on an animal than to test on a human but they are restrictions. All of god creatures must be treated compassionately and undergo the most effortless pain possible. Doctors that decide to do it the testing is required to have a Ph.D., …show more content…

It is not the best solution, but testing theories is an important part of science. It a human environment with a licensed doctor humans could benefit a lot from animal testing. Animal are being used for understanding diseases, but humans need that. However animals lives matter too ("Animal Research"). For example, all licensed doctors and/or scientist should use the “3Rs” Refinement of the total examinations for the animal so the pain is minimal, used the reduction of ostracized and more common species in one study, and replace one’s animal with a non-animal for one’s experiments ("Animal Research"). Another example is newborn monkeys that are taken away from families they are experimented on by getting drilled into their brains to drive them insane

Get Access