Animal Testing When it comes to the topic of animal testing, most of us will readily agree that it is a debatable topic. Where this agreement ends, however, is on the question of whether it helps ensure the safety of drugs for human consumption. Where some are convinced that these drugs tested saves many human lives. Others maintain that these tests serve no purpose in the end because the drugs used fall short to heal human disease. My own view is that testing animals with these drugs is not the most efficient way for animals and humans and because of that we are not exactly similar, making the results unreliable. Test include the Eye Irritancy Test, Acute Toxicity, and the LD50 Test. The Acute Toxicity Test determines how much a certain …show more content…
There are many consequences it may lead. After the testing most of the animals are euthanized and is done quickly to avoid pain to the animals. Others are let go, to be wild and some are put in the adoption places where one can adopt the animal. Animal testing is part of everyday life and has been a way to save human lives. It also helped cure diseases known such as the vaccine for polio, short for Poliomyelitis, and patients with aggressive brain tumors, but this process hasn’t found a cure for diabetes, cancer, HIV, or Aids. In addition, AIDS cannot be found in non-humans therefore cannot be very useful for animals. A similar disease must be put in the animal in order to test it on them, but you can’t test something similar to the disease to get an exact outcome. Although these test run on animals that may have some benefits, the results are not made accurately. The reason for that is because animals and humans, are similar, but not exactly alike. Both humans and animals share the same element. Such as neurobiological mechanisms, the same symptoms, the same treatment responses and the assumed origin of disease. Although animals may have all the organs a human would have, they do not function the same …show more content…
According to Ian Murnaghan, “many medical treatments have made possible by animal testing, it helped researchers find drugs and treatment to improve health and medicine, including cancer, and HIV drugs, insulin, antibiotics, vaccines and much more.” (Murnaghan) The essence of Murnaghan’s argument is that animal testing makes a huge impact on human health and medicine. By focusing on the pros of animal testing, Munaghan overlooks the deeper problem of experimental testing on animals. The most efficient way to see how a disease works in a human is to watch their progress over time called clinical observation. Scientist can direct the problem easily since it relates to humans. This has also been one of the most useful tools in curing
As of 2015, 200 to 225 million animals are said to used in laboratory research for the biomedical industry annually worldwide. Typically defended by arguments of reliability and human health benefits, recently the question of ethics and values placed on animal testing have caused it to become a relevant and pressing topic that has been more widely discussed and debated. First off, the laboratory conditions that are instigated upon millions of animal models for the sake of medical research has been said to be unethical and cruel. Additionally, it has been debated that the results of animal experimentation are unreliable across a wide range of areas. Lastly, animal testing not only leads away from the direction of resources from more effective testing methods but also prolongs the duration of time humans may need to wait for an effective cure. Therefore, the potential benefits of animal experimentation are greatly outweighed by the risks and collective harm of humans and animals which is why resources should be directed towards more human-based testing procedures.
Have you ever wanted to go into space? Well, many animals did during the beginning of the Space Race and it was very necessary. This was because we did not know if we could even survive in space. We also did not have the technology to figure it out digitally. Another reason why it was necessary was that we had many questions we wanted questions for on how our body would react in space. With these 3 reasons and evidence to go with them, I will show why sending animals into space was necessary.
The commonly used LD50 (lethal dose 50) test involves finding out which dose of a chemical will kill, and 50% of the animals being used in this experiment die. Despite its decades of use, it hasn't never been scientifically validated to confirm that its results do indeed predict chemical effects in humans.
Animal testing has its benefits towards human health. Improvement in health of the human race involves animal testing. Cancer, asthma, polio, TB, meningitis, smallpox, and the human papilloma virus (HPV) all have treatments that have come from animal testing. As a result of animal testing many people would be dying or suffering from the disease. Although, many people believe animals should not be used for animal testing.
Throughout history, animal testing has played an important role in leading to new discoveries and human benefit. However, what many people forget are the great numbers of animals that have suffered serious harm during the process of animal testing. Animal testing is the use of animals in biological, medical, and psychological studies. The development and enhancement of medical research has been based on the testing of animals. There are many questions being asked if animal research is good or not or if the benefit for us is way greater the abuse of animals. Doing tests on animals can help find ways to cure diseases, but testing on them is wrong. Although we want to find cures for diseases to help many people, testing on animals not only
Although animals testing help humans in many ways it can be cruel and inhuman to the animals being tested on. Depending on which lab the end up in they could be treated poorly and starved. They could be “inflicted with burn wounds and pain to test for a healing process” (Brown, 2017). This is cruel and just wrong for many reasons. “When testing to evaluate irritation caused by
“The Draize Eye Test is used to test shampoos, weed-killers, pesticides and household detergents. The substance under test is sprayed or instilled into one eye of a rabbit. Generally, no anesthesia is administered and the test often proceeds for 7 -14 days, during which the cornea, iris and conjunctiva are examined for signs of opacity, ulceration, hemorrhage, redness, swelling and discharge. The rabbit’s eye is then monitored over several days for signs of healing or deterioration. Typical reactions include tears, swelling, inflammation , bleeding and even blindness. Not only does this test cause immense suffering to the animals used, but it is also known to be unreliable and imprecise”(onegreenplanet). Animals are being tested on and being killed for humans humans don’t deserve all the animals in the world they are alive for a reason. And NO that reason is not for them to be tested on the reason they are alive is for them to live the best possible life they can, and same goes for
The harmful use of animals in experiments is not only cruel and inhumane but also often ineffective. Animals do not get many of the human diseases that people do, such as major types of heart disease, many types of cancer, HIV, Parkinson’s disease, or schizophrenia. There have been past occasions where drugs passed on animals weren’t even safe. There is no excuse for animal testing in today’s techy world, there are now many alternatives for animal testing that would put an end to the pain and suffering endured by these innocent animals during human testing.
Whether animal testing is considered to be useful or unnecessary in the development of medicine is an ongoing discussion. Animal testing is the issue Andrew Rowan and Jack Botting with Adrian Morrison discuss in both their articles. “Avoiding Animal Testing” was written in 2011 by Andrew Rowan and was published in The Scientist. Jack Botting along with Adrian Morrison are the authors of “Animals are Vital to Medicine,” which was published in the Scientific American. All three authors clearly state their position on this issue from the beginning of their articles, starting with each of their titles. In “Avoiding Animal
There are some good things about animal testing but also bad things. The bad things of animal testing is that it can either kill animals or cause them long lasting harm. If the animal gets hurt during animal testing then it could heal but sometimes that’s not the case and some animals will suffer from permanent damage. That permanent damage might even be painful. The tests done on the animal may be painful as well. Some of the drugs and products that pass animal testing aren’t necessarily safe. Animals are also very different from people. The animal testing can also mislead researchers to ignoring potential cures and treatments for diseases and illnesses.
Animal testing has for a long time been a much debated moral issue. For many, this kind of testing has been the only kind of hope for developing new medicines and treatments for illness. For others, it is an unacceptable and unnecessary cruel way of exploiting animals for our own purposes. Treatments for illnesses such as tuberculosis, diabetes, kidney failure and asthma have all been discovered, and vaccinations against polio, diphtheria, tetanus and measles for example have all been found.
With every new emerging disease and make up trend, hundreds and thousands of drugs are tested and evaluated before they are sold and used to ensure their safety in humans. Animal testing, also referred to as animal experimentation and animal research involves experimentation on animals such as mice, rats, rabbits, guinea pigs and hamsters in labs to investigate the safety and efficiency of a variety of products ranging from medication to cosmetics and even understanding the physiology of the human body. However, with masses of animals killed each year for this purpose; this essay will aim to evaluate the necessity of animal testing as well the opposition to why animal testing should not be a part of our human nature.
One of the main components that is not known well when it comes to having a discussion in animal testing is what exactly happens in animal testing and what the alternatives to animal testing are. Animal testing takes potential chemicals that industries want to introduce in cosmetics or medicine and injects them into animals to test their reactions to the chemical (Abbott 1). One example is called the draize test, which injects a needle directly into a rabbit’s eye to test the
According to the medical schools, the average of the science teachers that use real animals today are 8 of 154. In 1982, 107 of 124 U.S. medical schools used real animals to teach science. In addition, there are a lot of campaigns want to stop that from happening, but also there are a lot of companies are testing their new products on the before they offer them for sale. In my opinion, animals are great creatures and we should save their lives. We should not use the animals on medical test because it can end their lives and it will waste a lot of money.
Animal testing has long played a part in the science of testing, and it still plays a very important role in the medical world. Testing on animals in order to create a cure for AIDS is one thing, but testing on animals for human vanity is another. Animal testing is used to test the safety of a product. It has kept some very unsafe substances out of the cosmetic world. However, in this day in age, animal testing is not the only way to test the safety of a product. Animal testing in cosmetics has decreased over the years. However, it is still used by many companies in America. Animal testing is not only cruel, but it is also unnecessary in today’s advanced scientific world.