MEANINGFUL JUSTIFICATION REQUIRES THAT REASONS ARE MENTAL STATES In this essay I argue if we maintain that agents can be justified in action, reasons must be mental states, rather than facts as suggested by Alvarez and Hornsby . Reasons of fact would leave us with agents that are no more or less justified than any other agent in their decision making. I claim justification would be a pointless and arbitrary concept if reasons were not mental states. There are two important distinctions to make surrounding reason. The first is between natural causation and reason. Natural causation gets muddled up with reason when we conventionally use the terms interchangeably. For example, we colloquially say, “the reason it rained today was that a storm passed over London.” This is fundamentally flawed because this is a natural cause not a reason for it raining. Without getting too much into detail, clearly, there is a strong linguistic distinction between the two, but to succinctly clarify a few differences, we can refer to points made by Lacewing: 1. Causes precede their effects in time. Reasons do not. 2. Reasons can cite purposes… but a causal explanation cannot cite a purpose. 3. Reasons can be ‘good’ or ‘bad’… a cause cannot in the same way. 4. When we identify a cause, then the effect must exist. When we identify a reason, the action it is a reason for does not need occur. The second distinction to make is between normative and motivating reasons. I only distinguish them in
How is the term justification defined by scholars? What is your own definition based on your research?
| Demonstrates some understanding of descriptive and value assumptions and value conflicts, identifies some and provides satisfactory explanation of their effect on the argument. May have some confusion over definitions, but generally demonstrates understanding of the concepts.
Cahn, Steven M., Patricia Kutcher, George Sher, and Peter J. Markie, eds. Reason at Work: Introductory Readings in Philosophy. 3rd Ed. Florence, KY: Thomson Learning, Inc., 1996.
What reason engages in is always its own manifestation, be that language with its power of signification or be that harmonious numbers. In and through the sciences, reason searches for itself. Reason's true object is reason itself. Reason never simply deals with physical or historical objects as such.it manifests itself in culture and nature.
Therefore, this something must have caused. It would however be insufficient to just give an explanation which contradicts itself because it then becomes falsifiable. God has been the result of many of these inquiries however the reasoning to this answer follows many various roots. One occurring principle
Remember that the reason is a very concise sentence and it needs to be an opinion.
question. Students must consider factors and provide a rationale for which of these sets of ideas is of greater importance.
Clarify what is causing what by discussing if the effect would have occurred without the cause and if something else
A choice issues from, and can be sufficiently explained by, an agent’s character and motives, then to be ultimately responsible for the choice, the agent must be at least in part responsible by virtue of choices or actions voluntarily performed in the past for having the character and motives he now has (295).
The essence of the "why" in society can be seen through many cultures and time periods. From many of people in westernized grade school, children are taught the 5 "W's:" who, what, why, where, and when. Starting in basic education, people are taught and encouraged to be inquisitive creatures. Not that they need to be. Even from prehistoric times, there have been many instances of Pagan cultures, and gods being created to explain certain natural events, such as rain gods, or a god's wrath may explain a volcano eruption. For, when a child is writing about a ladybug, they will want to know why the bug is there. When humans question their own existence, they want to know why they themselves are there. In any instance, a human will always ask the question "Why?" Furthermore, with any instance, a human will always find an answer to their why.
Cause and effect – The cause is the origin of an event and the end result of the event is the effect.
Assignment—Complete Prewriting, Choose topic, and Complete Outline for the Persuasive Essay that is due in Unit 10.
We hear justifications and excuses every day. Both words in our world can be used in similar fashion. That being said, within the world of law, a justification is about giving reasonable reason for what was done or not. Excuses in the other hand, is a defense that recognizes a crime was committed, but that for the defendant, although committing a socially undesirable crime, conviction and punishment would be morally inappropriate. Justification and excuses are the most common affirmative defenses utilized to be exculpated from a criminal offence. Throughout this essay justifications and excuses are going to be explored in depth as there is a fine line between them. Justifications and excuses are going to be compared and contrasted. Also, court cases are going to be used as examples to expand on this two simple but yet complicated words.
For the most part, from understanding the book, the audience can tell that “reasons” are at this moment an endearing way of saying excuses and excuses are precisely complaints and weaknesses of as an individual who
respectively of which both will be discussed in depth during this essay to provide an