Why is our constitution called 'a bundle of compromises?'

The Great Compromise of 1787 was also known as the Connecticut Compromise of the Sherman Compromise. It was proposed by Roger Sherman. The Great Compromise was an agreement between large states and small states that guaranteed them 2 representatives in the upper house and equal power in legislative structure. This agreement helped make sure that all legislative branches had the same amount of power and control. This plan helped balance out and separate the power between all

The 55 delegates sitting down in the hot, steamy and sticky room debating about what to add extra rules or change the Articles of Confederation. For about 4 months, the people debated about how the government should take care of the problems, not giving the states more power than needed, talking about compromises and many more. On September 17, 1787, the constitution was sent to Congress for review. Then it was sent to the states for ratification. It took about two years for the Constitution for ratification. There were obstacles to be avoided too. The Federalist had to face Anti-Federalist, people who opposed the ratification of the Constitution. They believed that because they felt as though it gave too much power to the national government.

90% of slaves lived in the south in 1787, and the southneres wanted as much representation as possible. They argued on one side, for slaves counting for representation. Many northerners disagreed. They stated that slaves are treated like property and should be counted like it. James Madison had a solution, that slaves should count as 3/5 of a citizen.

Slaves were not considered people, they were considered property. Many slave owners thought of slaves the same way they thought of cattle or any other living property. Many believed that since slaves were referred to as property that they should not be allowed to be counted. However, southern states knew that slaves increased their population, which increased with the number of representatives that they had. The southern states were worried that if they did not have enough representatives that the northern states would try and do away with slavery. Therefore, they argued that slaves should be counted. Georgia and South Carolina threatened to secede if slaves weren’t counted. Following their threats the three-fifths clause was passed. In this clause, three- fifths of slaves were allowed to be counted in the representation. Slavery was not going to be allowed to be taken away with this clause in

When the framers began writing the Constitution, they had to contend with the popular opinion of the delegates. This resulted in heated debates on topics such as slavery. Although not necessarily all, or even a majority, involved in the discussions were in favor of slavery, it had to be ensured that the Constitution would be ratified. The South wanted to count slaves in the population in order to secure more seats in the House of Representatives. The North opposed this movement because it gave more power to the South. After deliberations, the Three-Fifths Compromise was agreed on. Every three out of five slaves counted as a person, this number was chosen because it maintained the balance of power between the North and the South.

In May of 1787, individuals from each state assembled in Philadelphia, to transform the United States government into an effective and powerful nation that conducted affairs in workable ways. The delegates meeting at the Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia in 1787 were given consent to alter and revise the Articles of Confederation. Except for those from New Jersey and Virginia, the representatives intended to revise the Articles. The primary issue that they resolved was that of State Representation. William Paterson and his associates offered a list of suggestions for revising the Articles of Confederation in his New Jersey Plan. Paterson, a delegate from New Jersey, supported the weak national government that the Articles made. Paterson declared imbalance of the rights of the small states against the large states and wished to expand upon the Articles making a more representative and all around well-organized government.

There was a constitutional convention held in Philadelphia in May 1787. Over 50 delegates came from the 13 colonial states. The constitution was made because people needed guidelines amongst other people from other areas. The framers had ideas that they wanted to be included in the constitution. There were many compromises and debates involved in the pre-stages of the ratification of the Articles of Confederation.

Until this compromise, the issues of slavery had not been extensively debated. Newspapers would comment, people would argue, and a few fights would go to a higher government level, but for the most part the North let the South govern itself and its slaves. When the issues finally began affecting them, the Northerners could not ignore slavery anymore. Until that point, it had seemed to be a non-issue. Some disagreed with it, but it supported the Southern economy and failed to do any harm to Northern white men. When the argument of votes in Congress came along, spurred by the Great Compromise and its two house system, it quickly became a heated debate. The power to have that many extra votes for Congress seemed outrageous to the North, who argued that if slaves could not vote, it made no sense for them to be

There are a number of compromises that can be found in the U.S constitution, all having had a major role in shaping what we all know today as the United States of America. With so many important compromises it is hard to chose just one. That being said, the compromise which I intend to discuss is the three-fifths compromise. This compromise is important in our history and is a pretty controversial matter.Three-fifths compromise was important for both the northern and southern states. The main question that was brought up for this subject was if slaves should be counted in census to determine the number of congressional delegates a state should recieve.

This compromise settled fears by Northern delegates of the South being overrepresented in the House of Representatives, but it made the Southern delegates nervous. They feared that giving Congress power over commerce would lead to unfair taxation practices on slaves or lead to the exclusion of slaves altogether. They were also afraid of the passage of navigation acts, which led to their asking for navigation and commercial laws to need a two-thirds vote in Congress in order to pass. There was a compromise reached by a committee who was handed the responsibility of making a decision on the matter. Two Southern states ended up agreeing with three New England states that if the latter would allow slaves into their states for a few years, then the Southern states would help to change the voting requirement for navigation

An article of Confederation was adopted by the Continental Congress, on November 15, 1777. It was the first constitution of America. Though, ratification of the Articles of Confederation by all thirteen states did not take place until March 1, 1781. After some all the states realised that article of Confederation is inadequate to resolve the national and international issues. As a result on March 4, 1789, Articles of Confederation was replaced by the new Constitution of 1787. This new constitution was signed by the members of the Constitutional Convention on September 17, 1787 in Philadelphia. In new constitution, members tried to strengthen the central government. The new constitution was the demand of time. It was more practical. It was broader than the article of Confederation. Under article of Confederation, states were free to form their military. But under new Constitution of 1787, this power was taken from states and given to centre. In new constitution, foreign affair and defence department was given to federal government. No state was given power to sign treaties with other nations. Some changes were also brought in the composition of congress under new constitution. Now, seats in congress were decided on the basis of population of each state.

The Compromise of 1850 was written by Henry Clay to try and solve the problems between the North and South. They thought that the compromise would make things better, but it ended up making things worse. The compromise was to fix the Fugitive slave law and make California a free state. There was many reason why the North and the South didn't like this compromise. The whole slave situation was one of the most frustrating of the compromise.

The Constitutional Convention of 1787 was held to address problems in governing the United States which had been operating under the Articles of Confederation since it’s independence from Britain. Fifty-five delegates from the states attended the convention to address these issues. The delegates consisted of federalists who wanted a strong central government to maintain order and were mainly wealthier merchants and plantation owners and anti-federalists who were farmers, tradesmen and local politicians who feared losing their power and believed more power should be given to the states. The Constitutional Convention dealt with the issue of the debate between federalists and anti-federalists. The debates, arguments and compromises

By the late eighteenth century, America found itself independent from England; which was a welcomed change, but also brought with it, its own set of challenges. The newly formed National Government was acting under the Articles of Confederation, which established a “firm league of friendship” between the states, but did not give adequate power to run the country. To ensure the young nation could continue independently, Congress called for a Federal Convention to convene in Philadelphia to address the deficiencies in the Articles of Confederation. While the Congress only authorized the convention to revise and amend the Articles the delegates quickly set out to develop a whole new Constitution for the country. Unlike the Articles of

( Madison's Journal) The delegates were dedicated to forming the constitution and would make whatever “compromises seemed necessary”. (Oakes 220) In the end the convention came to a compromise that would ultimately lead to a Nation divided.