What does it feel like using a mobile device everyday of your life knowing that there is someone on the other side of the screen monitoring your actions? NSA (National Security Agency) surveillance is a controversial topic in the United States today. Some may say that government surveillance is used for our safety, but others argue that it violates our rights. Wiretapping has been an issue with the NSA, where conversations through phones or other source of electronic communication can secretly be monitored. According to John Gibson’s article from Fox News, “NSA Wiretapping Program Not Strictly Legal but Strictly Necessary,” he states how without wiretapping, terrorist activities can and will become a threat because terrorist will be able to …show more content…
On the contrary, according to Ali Watkins’s article from Huffington Post, “Don’t Worry, the NSA Can Probably Still Spy on You,” she states that some provisions have been made with wiretapping, but now that there are gaps within the system since the government made provisions, there is still a possibility that some companies may be able to rebuild a data collecting system to secretly monitors people. Everyone is obligated to their opinion on the government monitoring their daily lives, but it takes away our rights of privacy.
First of all, bias by omission is relevant, but mainly in Gibson’s articles. Bias by omission by definition means that a fact is being left out or excluded from the current topic. In other words, each article makes their arguments about keeping or discontinuing NSA surveillance, and lacks opposing evidence from the other side. For instance, in Gibson’s article, he states that the program may not be
…show more content…
This bias is most relevant in the Gibson’s article. His article is more opinionated and he does bring in outside sources to say that NSA surveillance is necessary. He does not touch on the liberal side of his arguments and proceeds with his statements that we need NSA surveillance. He uses his examples of two Arabs being arrested due to terrorist activities and they were not monitored by wiretapping. In Watkins’s article there is not so much bias by placement because she recognizes the problems with NSA surveillance and refers to both sides. She acknowledges the different sections of the Patriot Act that affect both sides. There is bias placement because the more information and outside sources given in the article, we will tend to believe it is valid without seeing the other side of the
5 Ways You Give The Government Control” written by Kenneth Coats shows how the devices we use daily slowly take over individuals lives. Coats states, “Today, most people in the United States carry a mobile phone that accompanies them wherever they go. We use them for everything...This essentially makes them the perfect tracking and bugging devices”. Although electronic devices are known to be safe, they allow outside people to figure out individuals personal life. Due to the need for devices such as cell phones, each individual has a high chance of being socially stalked once in their lifetime. Coats then states, “Not only do intelligence agencies gather information via mobile companies, but… your phone can be hacked using spyware. Even if your phone is turned off, it can be remotely accessed to recorded conversations and take photographs”. This issue causes a panic due to the wide spread of inappropriate pictures and private conversations in one's life. Even though technology is viewed as a privileged, it is also taking away people's lives without their
Media bias refers to the bias of news producers and journalists that are in the mass media, reporting on a selection of events and stories and how they are covered. It is impossible to report everything, therefore, selectivity is inevitable. When watching or reading coverage on a specific topic, it is not difficult to detect the sources bias. The media will put their conservative or liberal spin on the information presented to their audience. This has been very obvious in recent days regarding the laws being presented to the Supreme Court regarding same-sex marriages. The coverage on this topic is either for or against same-sex marriage. The New York Times has a more liberal view, marriage is the union of people who love each other, regardless of their sexual orientation have the right to marry. However, CNN’s reporting is that of a conservative bias, marriage is the union of one man and one woman, same-sex relationships violates moral and religious beliefs of millions. According to the Pew Research Center, stories with more statements supporting same-sex marriage outweighed those with more statements opposing it by a margin of roughly 5-to-1. The news media coverage provided a strong sense of momentum towards legalizing same-sex marriage. When reading through articles from The New York Times and CNN, their bias is apparent through omission, source selection, story selection, placement, and spin.
Media bias is defined as “the perception that the media is reporting the news in a partial or prejudiced manner” (Dugger). This kind of bias can be observed everywhere and in every kind of situation. American people get almost all of their information from popular news outlets or some other form of media. The media is often guilty for taking advantage of their power and covering stories with a certain political bias. This is obviously an enormous problem. It was not hard to find an example of such bias and the influence it has on public opinion.
The author uses informative speech to make their point, therefore, there are no argumentative statements made in this. It’s not bias because they are just voicing what the protesters are saying and what they did. Since the author is informative, they leave quotes from social media which in turn questions their credibility. However, they mention a head figure, a mayor, who had the support of the protest and against deportation of immigrants. They also provided some statistics and numbers for
Whether it is calling someone on your phone or online shopping on the computer, people are more connected than ever to the internet. However, a person might be oblivious to the fact that they are being watched using these technologies. The NSA (National Security Agency) is an intelligence organization for the U.S. to protect information systems and foreign intelligence information. Recently the NSA has been accused of invading personal privacy through web encryption, tracking, and using personal information for their own uses and without permission. The surveillance of the NSA produces unlawful invasion of privacy causing an unsecure nation.
Bias is defined as a preference to or against something or someone. Brooke Gladstone is a media analyst and a managing editor of NPRs program, which covers journalism and other social issues. Gladstone's book"The Great Refusal" uses a comic format in attempt to answer the question "can reporters be objective?" She examines different types of bias in media and explains the reason behind them.
Throughout my research, a challenge I encountered was the fact that some of the articles I encountered seemed to included biases within them especially with the primary view of
The article is over the causes of bias and where the root of media bias stems. This will
While Bias in media may seem like an insignificant problem, it can have major effects on society, and even sway presidential elections. The problem is that there is a certain slant to all of the articles presented in the case of David Dao v. United Airlines. The topic is the perpetuation of misinformation concerning the United Airlines incident with David Dao. In order to prevent the perpetuation of misinformation the reader must identify bias. Source A is very biased concerning the David Dao case as it uses loaded words to describe the misgivings of United Airlines, Source B is slightly biased by quoting the most bombastic quotes from Jimmy Kimmel, while Source C is tilted to the right by sourcing right wing Mike Rowe.
People’s phones are being monitored by the government. Privacy and unmonitored spaces are not existent in today's world. One good example in today's world is the “Hello Barbie” by Mattel. This “smart toy” retails at 75 dollars and has features such as microphone to listen into little children's lives. The sound bites of the child are sent back to Mattel's headquarters to bexamined so the Barbie can give appropriate responses. Mattel could use this feature for advertisement. They could relentlessly pressure the children to ask their parents for the newest Barbie toy. One hacker named “Matt Jakubowski was able to get into the toy’s system to access users’ system information, Wi-Fi network names, internal MAC addresses, account IDs and MP3 files, he told NBC Chicago. He added that he would be able to use this data to find someone’s house and personal information, and could access their home network and listen to everything Barbie records” (***). This is a serious invasion of privacy and he was only able to do this with his laptop. Anyone can hack into a “Hello Barbie” and find out somebody's personal information. One other example in today's world is the NSA monitoring people. Edward Snowden was a NSA agent who exposed what the government was doing. This can be related to an section of the book Fahrenheit 451 when Montag realizes the hound is tracking him, “Outside the door, in the rain, a
Imagine a world where your every move was being monitored. A dark world where it is no secret who you are, where you have been and who you associate with; now include who you love, who you pray to and what you just ate for dinner. The word privacy doesn’t exist in such world and it is such world that we are heading to.“Big Brother is watching you!” This quote by George Orwell couldn’t have been truer. Every aspect of our lives is being sorted through as Big Data this very moment. Government surveillance has prevailed by the name of security. But, is government surveillance of internet digital communications like social networks, cell phone calls, text messages, and emails really a public service of security? Or
Media Bias has been a prevalent problem throughout history. For example in 1989 an article titled “Destruction of Warship Maine was the work of the enemy ”. Many would think this is a normal informative article however this article conveyed the idea that the destruction of the Warship was the work of the axis powers. This had been proven to be a simple accident. This is an example of pro-war bias. You can tell this because it is using the Pathos persuasive technique to make the people think that the destruction of the warship Maine was an attack to America and a threat to them personally, thus encouraging them to support the
To begin, government spying creates potential risks to public trust, personal privacy, and civil liberty, which is why dometic programs that allows bulk data to be stored should be put to an end. With the Patriot coming to an end, the senate voted to end NSA’s bulk data collection programs to end on may 13. “[T]he House overwhelmingly passed the USA Freedom Act by a vote of 338-88 . The bill would take the storage of bulk telephony metadata away from the government and would instead rely on the telecom
Americans have the right to know what personal information of theirs is being monitored by the government and if the government is operating in a constitutional manner. Although the top priority of government should be to protect Americans from international threats, it must do so without infringing on basic human rights. I believe that the Supreme Court rulings and laws regarding privacy are a good balance of protection and respect to privacy. However, government agencies such as the NSA have certainly overstepped their ground in many cases and abused clauses within the
Technology has become very effective for a thriving generation, but it also possesses a handful of flaws that counter the benefits. Technologies help people post and deliver a message in a matter of seconds in order to get a message spread quickly. It also gives individuals the power to be the person they want to be by only showing one side of themselves. But sometimes information that had intentions of remaining protected gets out. That information is now open for all human eyes to see. This information, quite frankly, becomes everybody’s information and can be bought and sold without the individual being aware of it at all. However, this is no accident. Americans in the post 9/11 era have grown accustomed to being monitored. Government entities such as the NSA and laws such as the Patriot Act have received power to do so in order to protect security of Americans. However, the founding fathers wrote the fourth amendment to protect against violations of individual’s privacy without reason. In a rapidly growing technological world, civil liberties are increasingly being violated by privacy wiretapping from government entities such as the NSA, Patriot Act and the reduction of the Fourth Amendment.