Women In Combat Essay

Women should not be in military combat because most women have babies to take care of at home. No crisis requires our government to send women in military combat, the author is dani martinez she is an author of many books and went to william woods university. Females are only 60 percent as strong as males. No female officer was able to complete the marine corps training course, the author was phyllis schlafly and she is a lawyer an activist and graduated from washington university . Females aren't as strong as some people think. Marine generals predict that women in combat jobs won't last, the author is rowa scarborough who is a news reporter and went to the university of maryland .Men are just stronger than most women and are made for combat.

The possibility of women becoming prisoners of war is more likely to happen. One case in which this happened is of Melissa Rathbun-Nealy, a military trained truck driver. During the Gulf War, she was stationed in Dhahran. The Iraqis captured her and held her for 33 days before she

Feminists and women’s activist groups would have us believe that women are equal in strength, skill level, and in every form as men. Some women are attempting to get into the front lines of combat using lines such as: “it would increase the number of available soldiers”, “women can be as strong as men”, “there won 't be any

Over the years the United States has grown to love each other as the way people are, especially women. Women have proven to be even stronger than what people expected them to be. You can see the strength, the courage, and the confidence they have gained. It has been discussed many years that women shouldn’t be allowed in combat for not being “strong enough”. Men have shown that they can be “manly” enough to do women or girl things, so why can’t women do “manly” things? If women feel like they can handle being on the frontline then we should respect their decision and allow them to go.

Throughout American history, women have contributed greatly to the war effort and military support of our troops. It began as early as the Revolutionary War when women followed their husbands to war out of necessity. Many served in military camps as laundresses, cooks, and nurses but only with permission from the commanding officers and only if they proved they were helpful (“Timeline: Women in the U.S. Military”).

Women and war have always been considered to have little in common. As the gentle sex, women are traditionally associated with the care and creation of life rather than with its destruction. However, over the past twenty years, women have increasingly served, and continue to serve, with valor and integrity in the Unites States Armed Forces (Kamarack, 2015). Although women have successfully proved themselves in the military, they should be restricted from entering into direct combat because they are less physically fit than their male counterparts, create animosity on front lines, and undermine cohesion within a military unit.

For years women were not adequate to serve in the military however now they can be any rank, however some can be affected by someone of a different gender battling alongside each other. As an illustration, Molly M. Ginty article “All Guts, No Glory” states many times a women soldiers gave their lives, yet never were their acts of bravery acknowledged. Eventually, women were given more advanced roles in the military, before any of this they could only serve as piolets or nurses. Subsequently, about 53 percent of the military is women rather they are on reserve or new recruits, these women are serving their country by their own choice. By the way, some of these women are in the combat area, which I personally thing if anyone want to do combat

There are many examples that can be cited where women have served in combat roles. World War II in the Pacific. When the Philippines fell to the Japanese, lots of American Soldiers, Airmen, Marines and sailors were captured. Among those Prisoners of War, were also women. These women were Nurses, who were taking care of the wounded. There were treated just as bad as the men and many times even worse. Granted, there not serving on the front lines, but the front lines came to them, when places like Bataan had to surrender. Another example, is an interviews that was conducted by NPR reporter Alex Chadwick, with Army National Guard Specialist Abbie Pickett. The interview was about Specialist Pickett experience while she was in Iraq. She was part of an engineer unit. She was outside the camp on various occasions, just like her male counterparts. She was as much as a target as the male soldiers. She was driving a fuel truck between different camps. All it would take is for one rocket to hit her fuel truck and she would be wounded or killed. She was not in a defined combat military occupational specialty, but she was in combat. This female soldier was one of many thousands of female soldiers that served in various capacities in Iraq, from driving trucks of supplies, to being part of convoys, to pulling guard duty at the various camps through Iraq. There are many examples of women serving in

The article addresses the immediate concerns and resolutions concerning military women in combat. David Lerman provided overwhelming evidence that allows the reader to imagine a world with women in a combat role. He also states the pros and cons for women in combat roles. Although it is clear from Mr. Lerman’s tone that he supports women in combat, this article did not overwhelm the reader with positive regards. It fairly suggests important processes that will need to be in place before this implementation can be successful.

Yet, many argue that the distinction between combat and non-combat becomes blurred in the context of women warfare (Ladin; Holm, Hoar). In actuality, many women are assigned to jobs that will expose them to enemy attack, and this has been openly acknowledged by the top Pentagon officials. The United States Army has also recognized that women would be deployed in combat zones as an inevitable consequence of their assignments. This was

Since 1901, women have served in some form of the military, however, dating back to the American Revolution women have had an unofficial role. Women have had and will continue to have an important role in the military, the question is whether women should be allowed to occupy specific combat positions. Traditionally women have not been allowed in combat occupations, but recently these restrictions have been somewhat lifted, making certain occupations available to women. Despite the lift complications arise from women being in combat vocations and it’s not just because of the physical differences, there is also the increased risk of sexual assault. Due to the detrimental impact on the military, soldiers, and society, women should not

When it comes to combat assignments and the needs of the military, men take precedence over all other considerations, including career prospects of female service members. Female military members have been encouraged to pursue opportunities and career enhancement within the armed forces, which limit them only to the needs and good of the service due to women being not as “similarly situated” as their male counterparts when it comes to strength or aggressiveness, and are not able to handle combat situations.

During the Revolutionary War, a soldier once removed a musket ball from their own body. The fighter had cut it out from their thigh. This soldier was a woman. She had to undergo that task because the medical treatment would reveal that she was a woman, which would stop her from fighting. (Ms. Hamilton). There have been many issues that had been discussed to allow women into military combat. Even though men may feel uncomfortable with sharing their jobs, women should be allowed in military combat because they have the skills to and they help to make it a more effective military work force.

After years of discussion and debate it appears that soon women will be sent into combat operations in the United States military. This is the way it should be because women are ready and competent to be put into combat roles in the U.S. military. Indeed, slowly but surely, the Defense Department and Congress have been inching towards a decision that will formalize the policy; in fact the National Defense Authorization Act, put before Congress in May, 2012 by U.S. Senators John McCain and Carl Levin will in effect order the military "…to come up with a plan to send women into battle" (McAuliff, 2012). Hopes are high that this will be approved by Congress and signed into law by President Barack Obama.

However if we look at the number of women in prison for murder or any violent offence we soon see this is not the case. Women have the mental capacity to kill another and this line of denial that our military top dogs are taking is ridiculous. As their second line of defence they will resort to the argument that: women are not strong to serve on the frontline. This is an unfounded debate. It is correct in that some women do not show the physical prowess of their male colleagues. But then again, there are plenty that do. Also the military training would work the same for women as it does for men in the way that women who meet the standards required of them would be drafted in the others would be let go.