When we talk about de-extinction most people today would say why do we have to do that? Right now scientists are working on a way to bring back the wooly mammoth. If that were to happen it could be a huge step towards trying to bring other things back. Also, it would help grow and repopulate the area of plants and animals that weren’t originally there. If we bring more and more species back besides just the mammoth it could repopulate more areas. There could just be a national park only dedicated to brought back animals. Scientists could study the animals out in the wild without having to lock them in a cage waiting for them to do something.Animals could add to the food web in so many amazing ways.LIke, when mammoth eat the grass it could take
Did the Mammoth and Mastodon come from a distant or common ancestor? I will be explaining whether the Mastodon and Mammoth came from distant or common ancestors. Also, I will be explaining why they migrated to North America. I will be trying to explain this by using DNA evidence to determine if they came from distant or common ancestors.
According to statistic brain, 3,879 animals were critically endangered in 2016. To rapidly increase reproduction, reproductive cells can be modified to get these animals born faster and healthier. In like manner, there is a possiblity of recreating genes of extinct animals. For example, wooly mammoths went extinct around 3,600 years ago, but they can be recreated. Scientists know what genes make these beasts up, so they can simply create them. This can provide a look into the past and help the world evolve. Conclusively, humans do not as of now have the ability to adapt to large enviromental changes. This could one day lead to the extinction to homo sapiens (humans). Genetic modification can help one’s body need less than it currently does. This includes heat, food, water, and more. Extinction can easily be
In this article, the major conflict discussed is whether scientists should pursue de-extinction in the years to come. De-extinction, also referred to as resurrection biology, is the process of creating an organism that either resembles or is a member of an extinct species. Scientists are fascinated by this field, but it sparks a major conflict with the ethical implications. I found this article extremely interesting because before reading this, I had never heard about this debate. I knew that technology is constantly growing and improving, but I didn’t know scientists were even considering this. When this debate was first introduced in the article, I thought it was fascinating and that scientists should definitely pursue this. What I did not think about however, are the questions one has to consider when delving into de-extinction- Where is the money coming from? Our country alone is in tremendous debt already. How much time will all this take? And the overall question is: Is all the time and money worth it? Would our species,
My ancient animal is the Woolly Rhino. In this report the reader will find out new and interesting facts about the Woolly Rhino.
According to Stanford Researchers there are five key benefits that would arise from de-extinction. This includes scientific knowledge, technological advancement, environmental benefits, justice, and wonder. Scientific knowledge refers to the fact that de-extinction could offer insight into the evolution of species. Technological advancement would occur meaning it would be a huge step forward for genetic engineering. The environmental benefits include the facts that de-extinction could restore and fix threatened or damaged ecosystems. Many people also fell that we owe these animals justice since humans are the reason a vast majority of these animals have gone extinct in the first place. Finally, many would wonder what it would be like to see a species that was previously extinct (Discover
Yes, I do believe that mammoths can really be brought back from extinction. Bringing these mammoths back to life is still a process. A scientist named George Church, along with his colleagues are using a process called de-extinction to achieve this very goal. A pro of this is because we get to study animal life and see how our ancestors work with mammoths. Also, in the process of trying to bring the mammoth back to life; we can learn a lot more about how de-extinction really works. On the other hand, there is a con. I feel as though adding another animal into the ecosystem comes in between the balance of things. Mammoths are extinct for a reason, bringing them back will only shorten other animals resources to survive. In the past it has been
According to Lister, the author of Mammoths: Ice age giants, woolly mammoths have been found frozen with different stages of digestion occurring in their stomachs, allowing their diet to be easily determined. They survived off of plants such as, grass and sedges, accompanied by, flowering plants, shrubs, mosses, and tree bark. Isotope analysis did prove that woolly mammoths ate mostly C3 plants. However, their diet did vary slightly by the location of their habitat. Woolly mammoths ate a wide-range diet to obtain their needed nutrition. Therefore, their molars were adapted to grind course grasses; the sharp enamel ridges ground the food by sliding across each other, and were wear-resistant to allow large quantities of food to be chewed. Also,
One might think de-extinction means bringing the dinosaurs back to life, but in reality de-extinction means reviving species that have died within the past few tens of thousands of years and have left behind remains that harbor intact cells. Extinct species should be brought back into extinction.
There are many animals that have went extinct due to humans in some way, shape, or form. If it is due to our overpopulation and moving into new areas taking over other habitats, which could also be deforestation or if it is due to poaching. For example, the West African Black Rhino was officially announced as extinct as of last year, 2016. Others like the passenger pigeon, Chinese river dolphin, wooly mammoth, and Tasmanian tiger are on the list of interest to begin working with their DNA. Scientist would like to bring species back like these and do not plan to waste any time on others like the T-rex who has been gone for about 65 million years. First, the T-rex is not needed in our present ecosystem. Secondly, we do not have a living species that could lay an egg at that size. Their plan is to not recreated “Jurassic Park,” the movie but to revive the species we have harm to possibly help the environment. Many of the species that have already become extinct have made impacts on our living species to the point that they are declining. The ecosystems have changed and our existing species are struggling to evolve. The wooly mammoth was a major contributor to their ecosystem in the Arctic. When mammoths no longer existed, the area went from grasslands to the cold tundra it is today. The limitations with this would be funding and would they
Another reason that de-extinction is not a good thing is because of human beings. We are not ready to have these animals back. When the Arabian Oryx population was drastically reducing, scientists returned them to a refuge in 1982. After they were returned, poachers nearly wiped them out. We are killing these species faster than they can repopulate. This is causing most of earth’s species to become extinct. Thanks to us humans, “Earth is in the midst of its sixth mass extinction: Somewhere between 30 and 159 species disappear everyday” (Shultz). There have been more than 300 species of amphibians, mammals, birds, reptiles, that have went extinct since 1500 (Shultz).If humans are unwilling to change our ways, then we have no chance of keeping
Mammoth Cave has many, many miles of seemingly endless tunnels and paths. The chambers are usually enormous, stalactites dangling from the limestone ceiling and stalagmites erected from beneath. Plenty of passages burrow deep within the rock, begging to be explored. Underground rivers travel across the cavern, bodies of water big enough to delve into with a boat. The homes of cave crickets and spiders dot the area, their presence unknown to even the closest listener. For just a moment, the unique scent of the cave and its many rivers and crystals give you a feeling of freedom and
De-extinction is the process of creating an organism which is a member of or resemble an extinct species. De-extinction I personally do not approve. I believe if the environment is left alone, it would not be a cause for de-extinction everything would reproduce on its own. Species has
This century to scientist is one for action. Acting on the wrongs we as humans have done to the environment, many would say preservation is key. There is continuous organizations working on preserving on the animals like WWF, along with foundations to help maintain the fossil fuels humans emit into the atmosphere. With the new technology leading the way many scientific advantages that once seemed impossible are now in reach, like de-extinction. The question today isn’t if de-extinction is even possible, but if we should even do it at all. Beth Shapiro, is a molecular biologist that is currently working on the process of de-extinction, “de-extinction is exhilarating and terrifying,” Shapiro stated in an interview. Shapiro is also an associate Professor in the Department of Ecology & Evolutionary
De-extinction has the capability of helping the environment, helping the world’s biodiversity, and quite possibly helping the economy. There are many options that are available through de-extinction and the world has the possibility of becoming a greater place through it. Living has become a goal for many species simply because extinction has become a larger threat for those many species. The Earth’s ecosystems are capable of rebirth and returning to the way they used to be. Through de-extinction the world can grow and become something it used to be. It was a clean, open, free world with opportunities in medicine, trade, and many other things. Through the years, humans have become the enemy of the world itself. “Conservation is about the ecosystems that species define and on which they depend” ( Pimm 10). De-extinction is a way for the biodiversity to be corrected from the many mistakes we’ve made in the past. Life will always find a
The woolly mammoth or Mammuthus primigenius was one of the last species of mammoth to be alive during the Pleistocene epoch. Approximately 400,000 years ago in East Asia, the elephant like animal separated from the steppe mammoth. The Asian elephant is the closest relative to the woolly mammoth who still exists today. The difference between the two relatives are that woolly mammoths have a thick layer of brown fur to keep their bodies warm in the Arctic’s rough weather. The species had massive curved tusks that were used for self defense on predators and also digging for meals under the snow. Unfortunately, these species became extinct about 10,000 years ago. There are a few reasons why woolly mammoths became extinct and the research will prove that.