Young Youth Display Anti Social Behavior

“The so-called traditional family, with a male breadwinner and a female who cares for the home, is a thing of the past” (Siegel, Welsh, & Senna, 2003, p. 194). This particular type of family structure can no longer be considered normal. Sex role changes have created a family in which the mother now plays a greater role in society and the economic process. The number of households that have children living with both parents has substantially declined. “Early social science researchers asserted that the “broken home” was the single most important factor in understanding delinquency” (Burfeind & Bartusch, 2011, p. 185). Less than half of the children born today will live continuously with their mother and father throughout their childhood. A disturbed home environment is believed to have a significant impact on delinquency. Family is the contributing unit towards children’s values and attitudes that mark the paths throughout their lives.

The criminal justice system approaches young offenders through unique policies to address the challenges of dealing with juvenile offending. They take special care when dealing with juveniles in order to stop them from repeat offending and stop any potential bad behaviour which could result in future. Juveniles have the highest tendency to rehabilitate and most adopt law-abiding lifestyles as they mature. There are several factors influencing juvenile crime including psychological and social pressures unique to juveniles, which may lead to an increase in juvenile’s risks of contact with the criminal justice system.

Trepidations pertaining to young people, being unable to fulfil their educational goals, being involved in antisocial activities, expelled from mainstream schools because of truancy and other disruptive transgressions or out of work, reinforce the obligation to the end child poverty ingenuity implemented by the Coalition Government in 1999. Equally, in their manifesto, the Conservatives avowed to enhance the emphasis on assisting families and vulnerable young people. Subsequently, this is trailed by the government’s enactment of pertinent policies to try and refine the life probabilities of young people who have numerous concerns. Likewise, this has prompted the invention of more initiatives, including the advent of the targeted youth programs.

Young people have been a main focus in society. Since 1960 there has been an increase in youth crime which is the reason as to why there are major adult concerns (Newburn, 2013). “Government became more harsh and intrusive in dealing with young people who were seen to be a problem” (France, 2007, pg.19). Older generations perceive young people as having less morals and respect in comparison to what they did at their age (Newburn, 2013). In particular, society views the youth of today as troublemakers, lazy, untrustworthy and unreliable. There are different theories that provide an explanation between involvement in offending and different factors such as family factors and wider social factors which will be discussed below.

In 2009, 18% of all offences were committed by juveniles, with most of these offences being for minor crimes such as graffiti, vandalism, theft, fare evasion, and road traffic offences. (Qld Police Service, 2009.) Most of these offences were “unplanned and opportunistic, and occurred when the juvenile was under the influence of alcohol and drug use, and affected by peer pressure.” (Cunneen and White 2007). Research also shows that juveniles are often victims of crime , with young people aged 15 to 24 years of age being at higher risk of assault than any other age group ( Eikelhor et al, 2009 ), and that this sometimes leads them to offending

InThe agencies that comprise of the youth justice system vary from the Police to youth courts. There have been areas to tackle such as the disproportionate number of BAME children together with considering the welfare of a child via the 1933 Children Act. In light of the Ameen Jogee case and other joint enterprise convictions , the trust between the police is only degraded , as they are depicted as an oppositional force for imposing the law amongst the youth population many of whom are also victims of serious crime. The distrust was illustrated in the report by Jenny Jones focusing on young people in London. She proclaimed in order to prevent crime young people must have in the Police force. It is likewise imperative that the Police develop

Unfortunately, the laws do not solve the problem but make the parents resent having the courts intervene in their daily family life. She explains how different methods of how a child is raised or how the parent is monitored does not guarantee that the child will not misbehave. Instead of holding the parents responsible, a volunteer mentor should be assigned to children with misbehavior qualities as it will help give the children an independent figure to look up to

The justice system assures that the protection of the public is taken into account when dealing with delinquents. The consequences received by youth, appear to be less severe than the adults; for the reason, that youth has much lower maturity level and are not mentally developed yet. One of the ways the protection of society is assured is by referring young people to programs, such as ‘John Howard Society’ and ‘Offender Work Programs’ to address circumstances underlying their offending behaviour. For example, a

Sometimes the effects are beneficial, for example when an abusive, negligent or violent parent is incarcerated, thus removing the risk of harm from the household. However, sometimes the effects are detrimental, and the child faces mental illness, behavioural problems, failure in school, substance abuse, teen pregnancy, and many other problems (Simmons). A child that witnesses the crimes and/or the arrest of their parent might experience flashbacks about their parents crimes or arrests (Simmons). A child might also be bullied in school because his/her child is never present for school events such as family day because he is in prison. Additionally, parental incarceration can result in an increased likelihood that the child will commit offences, either in adolescence or adulthood. According to the Women’s Prison & Home Association, Inc., “Children of offenders are five times more likely than their peers to end up in prison themselves. One in 10 will have been incarcerated before reaching adulthood,” (Simmons). Unfortunately, these negative effects are more prevalent in males. Because it is more likely that a father would be incarcerated, the male child no longer has a male role model and father figure in his life. In both male and female children, the negative effects of parental incarceration results in children engaging in dangerous, illegal activities as a way to cope. These activities include stealing, underage

Juveniles across the country have many issues in today’s society however; the issues that are at hand can be prevented if the parents or guardians have control over that certain juvenile. If that parent doesn’t have control of that teen there are certain places in which the parents can reach out to and get help dealing with the issues. But when it comes to parenting just because you don’t have control over that teen at that moment doesn’t mean you’re a bad parent because teens these days are dealing with issues such as high school popularity to even the issue of

Jones (2001) observed that the New Labour (YJB) policies were suppressing all youth justice through knowledge and practices however observes a widespread challenge from scholar and practitioners (Hopkin-Burke 2008). On the other hand, they were concerned that youth justice practitioners although there had experiences and expertise. Working with young offenders have been disillusioned and alienated them at a disadvantage due to the speed within the legislation changes for examples Muncie 1995 cited Hopkin-

Parents have a very big effect on how a child will act. This is why I believe that the third recommendation to reform the young offender’s system is one of utmost significance. Parents have a responsibility to shape their children and their lives so that they become a positive part of society. Parents who are uninvolved with their children’s lives and leave them to do whatever they want, leads to the child becoming troubled. Parents have the responsibility to make sure that their children are not committing violent acts, and to get them help if they are. If they do not, they will suffer financial penalties. Parents, whose children are troubled, would seek help for

The Children act 1989 and the Criminal Justice Act 1991 were the significant event occurred in the youth justice system in 1990s which had the combine effect that separates the system of dealing with children perceived to be in need of care and to be dealt in a separate court namely Youth court. This was aimed to be a welfare based system. But the increases in the juvenile crime in the 1990s and widespread publicity over persistent young offenders and the murder of two-year-old James Bulger by two ten-year-old boys became major concern which forced the main political parties to reconsider their positions on crime and punishment. As a result the political party committed to be ‘tough on crime ’. The use of warnings and cautions was criticised and discouraged. Later secure training orders for 12-14 year old and longer custodial sentence were introduced by the Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994.

As humans, we constantly make mistakes. We mess up, and many times, we learn to not make the same mistake twice. Children learn the most while growing up, observing the actions of the elders around them. There are many factors that come into play as a child develops in their community. For example, his or her home town, his or her parents’/guardians’ stance in the economy, or the school he or she attends. A child who grows up in an upper class community versus a child who grows up in a lower class community are bound to mature differently. The home environment greatly affects the way the child learns. To many people, the difference between right and wrong is very clear; however, to a child who has grown up in a mentally unhealthy environment, the difference may be blurry. Such as children who grow up in a violent setting are more likely to act in violent ways themselves. In the U.S., there are fourteen states who have no age minimum for prosecuting children as adults. Children as young as eight years old have been charged as adults for adult crimes. Approximately 3,000 children nationwide as young as thirteen years old have been sentenced life in prison without possibility of parole, leaving them to think about what

problems because they tend to lack economic security and adequate time with parents”. The simple statement that raw criminals are products of single-parent adolescence is absurd. What this writer must understand is that it can be extremely difficult for one parent to raise a child by themselves for many reasons. A single-parent must work full time to be able to afford to provide for themselves and their child. They must also be able to still have time to offer an exuberant amount of emotional time for the well being of their child. However, even though this may seem impossible, it can be done.