globalisation

Thomas Friedman defines globalization with three balances. The first is that “...traditional balance is between nation-states.” (472) He notes that “The shifting power between

In The Globalization Paradox, Dani Rodrik articulates a reasoned, cohesive argument which calls for the temperament of unbridled, dogmatic globalization as advocated by the current international status quo.

‘Globalization: What’s new? What’s not? (And so what)’, portrays the speed in which globalism has increased through many different factors; economically, military, environmentally and socially. This is an idealist analytic approach, not set in stone. This leads on to

Liberalism is one of few rational international theory approaches. More of a school of thought than a theory, Liberalism is less defined and less described than its harsher counter of Realism. Liberalism emerged in the 18th century in Western Europe as a school of thought that addressed and resolved domestic political problems (Hatto, 2015). Concerned with challenging monarchial and aristocratic forms of government since it’s beginning, Liberalism has always been very normative and focused on political institutions at the domestic level (Hatto, 2015). Over centuries, Liberalism has gradually been developed to portray a cosmopolitan worldview that places importance and context to states and the rise of transnational relationships. Liberals maintain hope and confidence in a future based on transnationalism, trade, and democracy. Yet, given the proposed anarchic system of the world, how can Liberals be so optimistic about world politics? This paper will examine the components of the Liberal school of thought and how they produce Liberal ideals. Secondly, this paper will analyze a case study of the European Union through a Liberal lens.

In regard to the issue of globalization, realist had a negative view about it. According to realism, globalization will only increase interdependence among states, causing insecurity (Kay, 2004). It also suggests that it will raise suspicion because the distribution of power is unequal, and it “favors the dominant international actors” (Kay, 13). The major challenge for realist is the role of power and the gains and loss of a state due to globalization. On one hand, a state can utilize globalization to advance their own interest and gain and exert power; on the other hand, interdependence can cause vulnerability which can lead to conflict (Kay, 2004). In a realist world globalization is basically a strategy in the competition for power between several major countries.

Commentators contend that globalization has disintegrated national sway and has brought about an exchange of force from states to enterprises or to universal associations. Since the late 1970s, there has been a developing acknowledgment of a belief system, frequently called "globalism," that supports an open market and constrained government impedance in capital and exchange streams. Corporate hobbies have driven this motivation, which they have forced, the faultfinders contend, on the creating

The world is not a large and strange place anymore. The world is a place that is interconnected and intertwined. The world has become from a place that each country and their peoples are separate and isolated to a place that each country and their peoples are part of a global network. Thanks to globalization this is occurring. Globalization is the ‘international integration” or ‘de-bordering’ – “a number of highly disparate observations whose regular common denominator is the determination of a profound transformation of the traditional nation-state” (Von Bogdandy 2). Globalization is connecting different people from different cultures and backgrounds together. More and more corporations are entering new foreign markets to sell their

In an article by authors, Lechner and Boli, globalization is described as having a different level of significance to each individual. The authors then provide a definition for globalization as referring to, “the process by which more people across larger distances become connected in more and different ways.” (Lechner and Boli) While globalization can be seen as both a beneficial and an unbalanced process, it is obvious that it has created diffusion and a greater sense of world consciousness. Interconnections across the world are increasing through the time-space compression that globalization creates. This process occurs through each form of globalization working together.

Kofi Annan, a UN diplomat, once said,“...that arguing against globalization is like arguing against the laws of gravity.” He is undoubtedly correct in this assessment. Indeed, globalization is no longer something to be skeptical of, it is very real and is changing our world exponentially. The affects of globalization, however, continue to be a heated topic for debate. Proponents praise the overall economic lift provided by free trade, the diffusion of cultures, and the spread of democracy and capitalism. Critics cry foul at the loss of national identity, the accelerated and uncontrolled use of natural resources, and the redistribution of wealth into the hands of a few very powerful people and corporations. Globalization is a

Scholte briefly examines six differing theoretical approaches to explaining globalization – what are they? What is the central theme of each?

Some view globalization as being inevitable and key to our economic future. It has the potential of making societies richer through trade, and creates knowledge and understanding to people around

To judge whether or not globalisation is a myth or fact therefore requires the full understanding of what the term means to it's critics and advocates, and in which ways they belive it to be myth of fact. Giddens simplifies the debate into two main schools - the sceptics and the radicals. A radical himself, he writes that "According to the sceptics, all

The term globalisation describes the process of becoming worldwide in scope or application, and the increasing interdependency of nation-sates. At least - that gives us one loose definition for globalisation, but as Scholte (2000) realises, globalisation is a thoroughly contested subject, with arguments extend across the issue of definition as well as measurement, chronology, explanation and normative judgement. In fact, Scholte identifies five contrasting definitions for the word 'globalisation ' as used by a number of the subject 's commentators and critics - internationalisation, liberalisation, universalisation, western/modernisation and deterrioralisation are (2000: 13).

Globalization is said to have three different perspectives, according to Latif, which can be affirmed as the hyperglobalist perspective, the sceptical perspective and the transformationalist perspective (Latif, 2010). Both the hyperglobalist and transformationalist perspectives recognize globalization as apparent in the world, however, they differ in that the former believes globalization is growing fast and

Globalization is a social process independent of man’s will. It is also a dynamic development process with inner contradictions and a dual nature. Although it provides a rare historic opportunity for many countries to develop, it also creates differences, competition and conflicts of interest. Globalization’s contradictions and dual nature also exert a complicated influence on contemporary international relations.