“The Political Context”
Describe how the Founder’s conception of the Constitution (reflected in Madison’s arguments) influenced the evolution of American public administration.
In Madison’s arguments he wanted the powers in the departments to be sufficient, flaw less, and have it where the different departments kept each other in their appropriate position. With this being said, Madison believed that his observations would be able to place these powers within the departments into a more proper judgmental structure. In order to properly do this, the Founder’s had to be able to implement the proper foundation for this to be successful. Madison stated that he believe that in order to exercise these powers in the government, each department
…show more content…
These two items are going to help the growth in public service in are like sciences, genetics, materials, etc. the public service is going to have to be able to take on t he challenge for learning the new knowledge and technology, but for those in public service they know it will take their services further. The changes that will take place in the future bring more responsibilities and create better opportunities to the people they are helping in public service. Another growth that is seen is the increased globalization with businesses, politics, culture, and environmental concerns. The nation is coming together with all these issue at hand in order to control them. We still don’t see “eye to eye” on all these issues but progress has been made, and will continue to progress due to the globalization in public service. The diversity allows for growth around the world and allows the public service to gain the new knowledge and better there are of control these growth opportunities are going to be a challenge: however, the public service is looking to improve the conditions in their society, and within the government, laws, groups, and communities. The public service makes and helps change laws that affect the public. The public administration works closely in getting these types of changes made to make the community a better place and to
1.) How did both Classical Republicans and the natural rights philosophers influence the Founders’ views about government? In the beginning stages of what we know today as our system of government, the Founders were combing through numerous sources in order to inquire about past entities and were in constant debate over how the United States was to be set up and how it was to run more smoothly than previous examples. The Founders were profoundly interested in the works of two different ideologies: Classical Republicanism, which was inspired by the political writings of Greek philosophers, Aristotle and Polybius, and Roman philosopher Cicero; and Natural Rights Philosophy, which came to the forefront by many political philosophers including
What does Madison rely on to prevent one branch of government from encroaching on another…virtue or ambition? What does this imply about the founders’ view of human nature?
‘Transformed beyond recognition from the vision of the Founding Fathers.’ Discuss this view of the modern US constitution.
With comparison between a small and large government, James Madison argues that a larger government, like the one proposed by the new United States Constitution, would protect from the tyranny of the majority that would likely be the result of maintaining a small government. He argues that voters are more likely to elect “fit” representatives, as compared to the higher corruption plausibility present in a smaller government. Madison formulates an important argument in favor of the government presented by the Constitution.
Although James Madison despised factions as explained in Federalist Paper No. 10, Madison believed factions were an essential part of government, that needed to be revised through careful governmental intervention. Madison was careful to ensure his vision for the country 's future would protect the given right to liberty; therefore he found in the Constitution multiple outlets for these factions to dissolve. However, the government itself was corrupt so the three branches had to be separated to prevent tyranny and be successful in stopping the dangerous factions. Therefore, in Federalist Papers No. 10 and No. 51, Madison would outline his goals for creating a more cohesive country.
The primary source is Federalist paper No. 10, which is a the first of James Madison’s contributions to the series of essays known as the Federalist Papers. This essay is a highly regarded paper among the collection. The Federalist No. 10 is merely rhetoric used to rationalize the benefits of a new system of government, explain how the new union will be constructed and most crucial to the essay, sway public opinion to support the ratification of the new constitution. This particular primary source is imperative to understanding the complexity of the United States government at the time of its birth as well as now. Madison makes an argument that the expansion of the federal government is necessary to protect liberty against the excess of democracy. The document reveals the advantages of a Republic and serves as an explanation as to why the U.S. espouses a Republican form of government and the Constitution.
Using information from the evidence below as well as your knowledge of the period, discuss the development of the United States Constitution as a document which ensured popular sovereignty.
Prompt 1. Identify and describe 4 influential philosophers whose ideas influenced the Founding Fathers in setting up the structure…
From the beginning, America has been a safe place for the fostering and cultivating of new thoughts and ideologies, but not without repercussion. This is evident in the life of both John Winthrop and James Madison. From early on in their political careers, both leaders faced political opposition. John Winthrop left familiarity in search of religious freedom and the pursuit of a life pleasing to God. James Madison, in creativity, thought of an entirely renovated way to successfully restructure the government of a nation that acted more as separate states. By using their backgrounds as a driving force for innovation they renovate governmental systems and lead the people from the ground up, inspired by Reformation and republicanism. Their implementation of government was different in emphasis, but the republican ideals behind it were the same.
Part B: Discuss the development of a national government in the United States, from the Albany Plan to the ratification of the U.S. Constitution.
With the concept of majority tyranny in mind, the founder’s, including Madison, divided the power of the government into three different branches. The need
Whose side would you have been on in the 1790s, Thomas Jefferson’s or Alexander Hamilton’s? Both of these men served under George Washington in the first presidential cabinet, yet they had very different views of what government should be (Davis 86). My objective in this research essay is to inform the reader of why there was so much controversy between these two founding fathers, and to determine which side had the better views for our newly forming country.
28. To what extent was the United States Constitution a radical departure from the Articles of Confederation? (2005B)
The argument between Federalists and Anti-Federalists might seem long gone to American citizens, but still their philosophical foundations shape the teams, scope and size of the battlefield. These philosophies go back to two lone men, Alexander Hamilton and Thomas Jefferson. Both fought aggressively for a government based on their ideas, and both did make portions of the now-standing American government. This essay will outline the political, social and economic philosophies of both men, how their philosophies influenced the government today, and a closing opinion.
Madison is trying to point out that the power of the government needs to be spread out and that there needs to be checks and balances. There needs to be checks and balances in order to prevent one branch of government from gaining too much power and making decisions on its own. John Dalberg-Acton said “Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely." as quoted in Letters of Thomas Jefferson Concerning Philology and the Classics, Volume 137