I need a better understanding 2: The Constitut X由https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1175LoRpgBNBJN7rn5BTPB32YzHYKBMj61wyeiXWcHs8/edit#slide=id.g87...pter 2: The Constitution and Its Origins (Online)个▼O SlideshowA Share- Insert Format Slide Arrange Tools Add-ons HelpLast edit was 11 minutes ago田BackgroundLayout -ThemeTransition8.9 ..4Excerpt Two:1. Is this author a Federalist or Anti-Federalist?The most considerable of the remaining objections isthat the plan of the convention contains no bill ofrights... [Bills of rights] have no application toconstitutions professedly founded upon the power ofthe people, and executed by their immediaterepresentatives and servants. Here, in strictness, thepeople surrender nothing; and as they retainthing they have no need of particular reservations."WE, THE PEOPLE of the United States, to secure theblessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity, doORDAIN and ESTABLISH this Constitution for theUnited States of America."...How can you tell? (Use at least two pieces of thetext to help you answer this.)veryType your answer here.I go further, and affirm that bills of rights, in the senseand to the extent in which they are contended for, arenot only unnecessary in the proposed Constitution, butwould even be dangerous. They would contain variousexceptions to powers not granted; and, on this veryaccount, would afford a colorable pretext to daimmore than were granted. For why declare that thingschall potshall not be done which there is no power to do? Why,for instance, should it be said that the liberty of thepress shall not be restrained, when no power is givenby which restrictions may be imposed? ...Click to add speaker notesExplore5:53 PMCo search63°F Sunny1/29/2022

Question

I need a better understanding 2: The Constitut X由https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1175LoRpgBNBJN7rn5BTPB32YzHYKBMj61wyeiXWcHs8/edit#slide=id.g87...pter 2: The Constitution and Its Origins (Online)个▼O SlideshowA Share- Insert Format Slide Arrange Tools Add-ons HelpLast edit was 11 minutes ago田BackgroundLayout -ThemeTransition8.9 ..4Excerpt Two:1. Is this author a Federalist or Anti-Federalist?The most considerable of the remaining objections isthat the plan of the convention contains no bill ofrights... [Bills of rights] have no application toconstitutions professedly founded upon the power ofthe people, and executed by their immediaterepresentatives and servants. Here, in strictness, thepeople surrender nothing; and as they retainthing they have no need of particular reservations.&#34;WE, THE PEOPLE of the United States, to secure theblessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity, doORDAIN and ESTABLISH this Constitution for theUnited States of America.&#34;...How can you tell? (Use at least two pieces of thetext to help you answer this.)veryType your answer here.I go further, and affirm that bills of rights, in the senseand to the extent in which they are contended for, arenot only unnecessary in the proposed Constitution, butwould even be dangerous. They would contain variousexceptions to powers not granted; and, on this veryaccount, would afford a colorable pretext to daimmore than were granted. For why declare that thingschall potshall not be done which there is no power to do? Why,for instance, should it be said that the liberty of thepress shall not be restrained, when no power is givenby which restrictions may be imposed? ...Click to add speaker notesExplore5:53 PMCo search63°F Sunny1/29/2022

Accepted Answer

The given excerpt has been taken from the Federalist Papers: No. 84. It was written and published by…

1. Is this author a Federalist or Anti-Federalist? How can you tell? (Use at least two pieces of the text to help you answer this.)