2) Two consumers R and S share an endowment (x, y) of goods X and Y. The consumers' utilities from consumption can be written as UR = aln(XR) + bln(y), and Us=aln(xs) + bln(ys), where XR, XS, YR, and ys are the quantities which each consumes, and a and b are parameters, for which a + b =1. Write a report in which you a) Define the concept of the contract curve, and show that for these endowments, it will be the upward diagonal of the Edgeworth box, which shows all possible divisions of the endowment. b) Assume that in the initial endowment, XRE = XE and ysE=yE. R begins with the endowment of X and S begins with the endowment of Y. By setting up a constrained maximisation problem for each consumer, obtain their offer curves, and hence obtain the Walrasian equilibrium. c) State the two welfare theorems, and explain how they apply in this case.

2) Two consumers R and S share an endowment (x, y) of goods X and Y. The consumers' utilities from consumption can be written as UR = aln(XR) + bln(y), and Us=aln(xs) + bln(ys), where XR, XS, YR, and ys are the quantities which each consumes, and a and b are parameters, for which a + b =1. Write a report in which you a) Define the concept of the contract curve, and show that for these endowments, it will be the upward diagonal of the Edgeworth box, which shows all possible divisions of the endowment. b) Assume that in the initial endowment, XRE = XE and ysE=yE. R begins with the endowment of X and S begins with the endowment of Y. By setting up a constrained maximisation problem for each consumer, obtain their offer curves, and hence obtain the Walrasian equilibrium. c) State the two welfare theorems, and explain how they apply in this case.

Microeconomic Theory

12th Edition

ISBN:9781337517942

Author:NICHOLSON

Publisher:NICHOLSON

Chapter3: Preferences And Utility

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 3.9P

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Demonstrate that the demands obtained in exercise 2.4 are homogeneous of degree zero in prices. Show that doubling prices does not affect the graph of the budget constraint. Exercise 2.4 Let a consumer have preferences described by the utility function and an endowment of 2 units of good 1 and 2 units of good 2. a. Construct and sketch the consumer’s budget constraint. Show what happens when the price of good 1 increases. b. By maximizing utility, determine the consumer’s demands. c. What is the effect of increasing the endowment of good 1 upon the demand for good 2? Explain your finding.
A and B consume only two goods, cider (C) and dumplings (D). A has an initial endowment of 10 bottles of C and 30 of D. Bob has an initial endowment of 50 bottles of cider and 50 dumplings. Alice’s utility function is uA(CA,DA) = 9ln(CA) + 10ln(DA), where CA and DA represent consumption of C and D, respectively. B’s utility function is uB(CB,DB) = CBXDB, where CB and DB denote B's consumption of C and D. a) Find the competitive equilibrium, i.e. the price ratio, of this exchange economy and the resulting equilibrium allocation. b) Find the expression of the contract curve for this economy and use your answer to check that the equilibrium allocation you found in (b) is indeed Pareto optimal.
Suppose that a fast-food junkie derives utility from three goods-soft drinks (x), hamburgers (y), and ice cream sundaes (z)− according to the Cobb-Douglas utility function U(x,y,z)=x0.5y0.5(1+z)0.5. Suppose also that the prices for these goods are given by px=1,py=4, and pz=8 and that this consumer's income is given by I=8.a. Show that, for z=0, maximization of utility results in the same optimal choices as in Example 4.1 . Show also that any choice that results in z>0 (even for a fractionalz ) reduces utility from this optimum.b. How do you explain the fact that z=0 is optimal here?c. How high would this individual's income have to be for any z to be purchased?
Student question Time Left :00:09:43Suppose there are two consumers, A and B. The utility functions of each consumer are given by: UA(X,Y) = 2X + Y UB(X,Y) = Min(X,Y) The initial endowments are: A: X = 5; Y = 3 B: X = 2; Y = 2 a. Illustrate the initial endowments in an Edgeworth Box. Be sure to label the Edgeworth Box carefully and accurately, and make sure the dimensions of the box are correct. Also, draw each consumer’s indifference curve that runs through the initial endowments. Is this initial endowment Pareto Efficient? b. Now suppose Consumer A gets all of both goods. Is this allocation Pareto Efficient? (You do not need to draw a new graph or illustrate this on the existing graph. Simply answer “yes” or “no.”) c. Now suppose Consumer B gets all of both goods. Is this allocation Pareto Efficient? (You do not need to draw a new graph or illustrate this on the existing graph. Simply answer “yes” or “no.”)
Bob enjoys cookies (x) according to the utility function U(x)=20x- 2 tx , where t is a parameter that reflects how hungry he is. Cookies are costless in Bob’s world and so there is no income constraint. Using the envelope theorem, calculate how Bob’s maximum utility from eating cookies varies with t.
Consider an economy with 2 goods and 30 agents. There are 10 agentseach with the utility function u (x1; x2) = ln x1 + 2 ln x2 and endowments e = (3; 1).Also, the other 20 agents each have the utility function u (z1; z2) = 2 ln z1 + ln z2 andendowments e = (1; 2). Normalize p2 = 1. Calculate the Walrasian equilibrium pricep1*
Consider the utility functions below of two individuals, A and B, and bundles of goods Q and R. UA=X0.5Y0.5; UB=X+2Y; Bundle Q (10, 10); Bundle R (10, 15). Suppose the total X and total Y available in the economy are both equal to 20. a. If initially both individuals are consuming bundle Q, then a pareto-improvement is possible through reallocation of goods, i.e. individual A gives B some of his good X in exchange for some of individual B’s good Y. (True or False? Explain through mathematical examples).b. Pareto-optimality is achieved if we give individual B Bundle R and the remaining goods X and Y available in the economy is given to individual A. (True or false? Explain through a graphical example)
A possible explanation for the indecency might be the fact that the consumers are not all alive at the same time and therefore some mutually advantageous trades cannot occur. Consider an economy where consumer t receives an endowment of 1 unit of the single consumption good at time t and obtains utility only from consumption at times t and t + 1. All consumers meet at time 0 to trade. What is the equilibrium? Is exigency restored?
Smith and Jones are stranded on a desert island. Each has in her possession some slices of ham (H) and cheese (C). Smith prefers to consume ham and cheese in the fixed proportion of 2 slices of cheese to each slice of ham. Her utility function is given by Us = min(10H, 5C). Jones, on the other hand, regards ham and cheese as substitutes – she is always willing to trade 3 slices of ham for 4 slices of cheese, and her utility function is given by UJ = 4H + 3C. Total endowments are 100 slices of ham and 200 slices of cheese. a. Draw the Edgeworth Box diagram for all possible exchanges in this situation. What is the contract curve for this exchange economy? b. Suppose Smith’s initial endowment is 40 slices of ham and 80 slices of cheese (Jones has the remaining ham and cheese as her initial endowment). What mutually beneficial trades are possible in this economy and what utility levels will Smith and Jones enjoy from such trades? c. Now imagine a new endowment in which Smith has 60 slices…
Let Utility Function be U = min {X, Y} As given Endowment of Good 1 and Good 2 is 100 and 200 respectively. Suppose that price of good x increases from 10 to 15 and price of good y is 10 , then Calculate Endowment Income effect
A consumer has GH¢600 to spend on two commodities, A and B. Commodity A costs GH¢20 per unit and Commodity B costs GH¢30 per unit. Suppose that the utility derived by the consumer from x units of Commodity A, and y Commodity B is given by the Cobb-Douglas utility functionU (x, y) = 10x0.6y0.4a. How many units of each commodity should the consumer buy tomaximize utility?b. Is the budget constraint binding?
Consider a couple's decision about how many children to have. Assume that over a lifetime a couple has 100,000 hours of time to either work or raise children. The wage is $10 per hour. Raising a child takes 10,000 hours of time. a. Make a graph with the budget constraint showing the trade-off between lifetime consumption and number of children. (Ignore the fact that children come only in whole numbers!) Show indifference curves and an optimum choice. b. Suppose the wage increases to $15 per hour. Show how the budget constraint shifts. Using income and substitution effects, discuss the impact of the change on number of children and lifetime consumption. c. We observe that, as societies get richer and wages rise, people typically have fewer children. Is this fact consistent with this model? Explain.