2. In 1969, the Supreme Court ruled that public school officials could not restrict students from wearing black armbands as a peace sign protesting the U.S. involvement in the Vietnam War, ruling that students do not shed their constitutional rights at the schoolhouse gates. In 2007, the Supreme Court held that public school officials could restrict students from engaging in speech that might undermine the school's zero tolerance policy on drug use. What factors do you think might explain the Court's decisions in these two cases?

Principles of Economics, 7th Edition (MindTap Course List)
7th Edition
ISBN:9781285165875
Author:N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher:N. Gregory Mankiw
Chapter22: Frontiers Of Microeconomics
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 8PA
icon
Related questions
Question
In 1969 , the Supreme Court ruled that public school officials could not restrict students from wearing black armbands as a peace sign protesting the U.S. involvement in the Vietnam War, ruling that students do not shed their constitutional rights at the schoolhouse gates. In 2007, the Supreme Court held that public school officials could restrict students from engaging in speech that might undermine the school's zero tolerance policy on drug use. What factors do you think might explain the Court's decisions in these two cases?
2. In 1969, the Supreme Court ruled that public school officials could not restrict students
from wearing black armbands as a peace sign protesting the U.S. involvement in the
Vietnam War, ruling that students do not shed their constitutional rights at the
schoolhouse gates. In 2007, the Supreme Court held that public school officials could
restrict students from engaging in speech that might undermine the school's zero
tolerance policy on drug use. What factors do you think might explain the Court's
decisions in these two cases?
Transcribed Image Text:2. In 1969, the Supreme Court ruled that public school officials could not restrict students from wearing black armbands as a peace sign protesting the U.S. involvement in the Vietnam War, ruling that students do not shed their constitutional rights at the schoolhouse gates. In 2007, the Supreme Court held that public school officials could restrict students from engaging in speech that might undermine the school's zero tolerance policy on drug use. What factors do you think might explain the Court's decisions in these two cases?
Expert Solution
steps

Step by step

Solved in 2 steps

Blurred answer
Similar questions
  • SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
Principles of Economics, 7th Edition (MindTap Cou…
Principles of Economics, 7th Edition (MindTap Cou…
Economics
ISBN:
9781285165875
Author:
N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)
Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:
9781305585126
Author:
N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Principles of Microeconomics (MindTap Course List)
Principles of Microeconomics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:
9781305971493
Author:
N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Principles of Microeconomics
Principles of Microeconomics
Economics
ISBN:
9781305156050
Author:
N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher:
Cengage Learning