4. Point out TRUE/ FALSE of the following statements: (a) A CLR(1) grammar can guarantee there is no SR conflict in LALR(1). (b) A CLR(1) grammar can guarantee there is no RR conflict in LALR(1). (c) All unambiguous grammar are CLR(1) parseable. (d) All grammar can be possible to convert in Operator Precedence Grammar (OPG). (e) If a Grammar is CLR(1), it is definitely LL(1).

4. Point out TRUE/ FALSE of the following statements: (a) A CLR(1) grammar can guarantee there is no SR conflict in LALR(1). (b) A CLR(1) grammar can guarantee there is no RR conflict in LALR(1). (c) All unambiguous grammar are CLR(1) parseable. (d) All grammar can be possible to convert in Operator Precedence Grammar (OPG). (e) If a Grammar is CLR(1), it is definitely LL(1).

Database System Concepts

7th Edition

ISBN:9780078022159

Author:Abraham Silberschatz Professor, Henry F. Korth, S. Sudarshan

Publisher:Abraham Silberschatz Professor, Henry F. Korth, S. Sudarshan

Chapter1: Introduction

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1PE

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

In the name LL(1), the first L stands for scanning the input from left to right, the second L stands for producing a leftmost derivation, and the 1 stands for using one input symbol of lookahead at each step to make parsing action decision. As of now the grammar is not in LL(1). How can we modify the grammar to obtain an equivalent grammar that is LL(1)? Explain why the modified grammar is LL(1).
(20 Points) Consider the following grammars where S is the start symbol and a, b, and c are terminal symbols and A, B, and C are non-terminal symbols.S ---> aA | bB | cCA --> aA | aB | aB --> bB | bC | bC --> cC | cExplain in your own words what the grammar generates. Which of the following sentences are in the language generated by the grammar? Show derivations. If a sentence cannot be generated by the grammar, explain why abcabcab aaaaaabb cccccaaaa bbbbbbbc aaaaaaccc
Given the context-free grammarS -> aB | bAA -> aS | bAA | aB -> bS | aBB | b Construct a PDA that simulates the grammar, that is, the rules of the grammar must be part of the machine (left most derivation always done).
Exercise 1 Consider the following BNF grammar for a language. Answer the questions below according to the grammar. <fun> -> <pon> <fun> -> <pon> + <fun> <ybu> -> <fun> <ybu> -> <fun> @ <ybu> <pon> -> A <pon> -> Y <pon> -> B <pon> -> U A. What is the associativity of the @ operator: left-right-neither B. What is the associativity of the + operator: left-right-neither C. Which operator has higher precedence: @-+-neither D. The grammar is left recursive-right recursive-both-neither
Consider the following grammar and perform required tasks; S -> aA | abS A -> BB | CAC B -> bB | Ɛ C -> aC Eliminate all ϵ-productions. Eliminate all unit productions from the resulting grammar in part a. Eliminate all useless symbols from the resulting grammar in b. Put the resulting grammar in c) in Chomsky Normal Form.
Consider the following context-free grammar: S -> Bb | Cd B -> aB | a C -> dC | e 1. Compute the LR(1) items. 2. Construct the CLR(1) parsing table and state the reason wether the given grammar is LR(1) grammar or not. 3. Construct the LALR(1) parsing table and check wether the given grammar is LALR(1) grammar or not.
explain in depth and give answer Establish that L is context-free by building a CF grammar for L = {0n1m: 3m ≤ n ≤ 4m and m ≥ 0}.
Consider the following grammar: X -> (Y) | bY -> Y, X | X-for the input string ((b),b,(b,b)),show the parsing stack and actions of the parsing SLR(1) parser.- Is this grammar an LR(0) grammar? If not, describe the LR(0) conflict. If so, construct the LR(0) parsing table, and describe how a parse might differ from an SLR(1) parse. Pay attention to the grammar given
Let be the following LL(1) grammar with empty rules: a-) Prove that it is an LL(1) grammar with empty rules.b-) Build the recognition table.c-) Test step by step if it is possible to recognize the string abbc#.
Have to construct 5 Context free grammars and take 3 strings for each of the grammar to test. In these 3 strings, 1 string will be accepted by the grammar and other 2 strings will be rejected. the strings have to be minimum of length 5. Have to do CNF(Chomsky normal form) and CYK algorithm for all the strings.
Consider the following grammar: X -> (Y) | b Y -> Y, X | X 1. for the input string ((b),b,(b,b)),show the parsing stack and actions of the parsing SLR(1) parser. 2. Is this grammar an LR(0) grammar? If not, describe the LR(0) conflict. If so, construct the LR(0) parsing table, and describe how a parse might differ from an SLR(1) parse.
I need full solution with a predictive parsing table for the given grammar or Check whether the given grammar is LL(1) or not. S → iEtSSI | a SI → eS | € E→b