5.Order Notation. Consider each pair of functions below. Give a formal proofusing a direct proof technique, that f(n) e O(g(n)). Recall that f(n) E O(g(n)) if andonly if 3c € R+, 3no E N, Vn E N, n > no→ f(n) < c· g(n)f(n) = 7n² log, n+ 12n + 7 and g(n) = 3n³ – 4n? + 12.a.f(n) =2n2 -n+6n-15and g(n) = n? – 16.b.%3D

Here in this multi parts question we have have two function f(n) and g(n).so using some formal proof…

5. Order Notation. Consider each pair of functions below. Give a formal using a direct proof technique, that f(n) € O(g(n)). Recall that f(n) E 0(g(n)) only if 3c € R+, 3no E N, Vn E N, n > no→ f(n) < c· g(n) f(n) = 7n² log, n+ 12n + 7 and g(n) = 3n³ – 4n? + 12. a. f(n) = 2n2 -n+6 n-15 and g(n) = n? – 16. b. %3D

5. Order Notation. Consider each pair of functions below. Give a formal using a direct proof technique, that f(n) € O(g(n)). Recall that f(n) E 0(g(n)) only if 3c € R+, 3no E N, Vn E N, n > no→ f(n) < c· g(n) f(n) = 7n² log, n+ 12n + 7 and g(n) = 3n³ – 4n? + 12. a. f(n) = 2n2 -n+6 n-15 and g(n) = n? – 16. b. %3D

Database System Concepts

7th Edition

ISBN:9780078022159

Author:Abraham Silberschatz Professor, Henry F. Korth, S. Sudarshan

Publisher:Abraham Silberschatz Professor, Henry F. Korth, S. Sudarshan

Chapter1: Introduction

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1PE

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Computer Science Given 2 arrays X[1...n] and Y[1...m], provide time analysis in term n and m successor (X[1...n]. Y[1...m]): set sucessor[1...m] to infinitive for each 1<= i <=n: for each 1<= j <=m: if Y[j] < X[i] and X[i] < successor[j]: successor[j] = X[i] return successor
Given the following code snippet, find the following:1) Recurrence relation of func (x,y) when x>0 and length of y is n. Express in the form below:T(x,n) = T(?) + O(?)For 2-3, consider worst-case scenario and initial value of y as [1]2) Time complexity of func (x,y)3) Space Complexity and Auxiliary Space Complexity of func (x,y)
1. With the aid of Truth tables, determine which of the following logical statements (or expressions)is a Tautology, a Contradiction, or a Contingency.(a) (p ↔ q) ↔ ((p → q) ∧ (q → p))(b) (p → (q → r)) ↔ (p ∧ q → r)(c) (p → r ∨ q)⊕(q ∧ r)(d) p ∨ q ∧ (¬r → ¬p ∧ ¬q) 2. With reference to the following logical equivalences, determine whether each of them is valid orinvalid. If it is invalid then give a counterexample (e.g. based on a Truth-Value assignment).If it is valid then give an algebraic proof using ONLY logical equivalences from Table 6 inSection 1.3 of course textbook, and the rule for conditional: p → q ≡ ¬p ∨ q.(a) p → (q → r) ≡ (p → q) → r(b) (p → r) ∨ (q → r) ≡ (p ∧ q) → r(c) (¬p → (q ∧ ¬q)) ≡ p(d) p ∧ q → r ≡ (¬p ∧ ¬q) → ¬r 3. Express the following logical statements in terms of the Contrapositive, Converse, and Inverse,respectively.(a) You are an adult provided that you are above 18 years of age.(b) It is daylight whenever the sun is shining.(c) 3 × 2 = 6 only if 2 × 3 = 6.
Please answer the following question in depth with full detail. Consider the 8-puzzle that we discussed in class. Suppose we define a new heuristic function h3 which is the average of h1 and h2, and another heuristic function h4 which is the sum of h1 and h2. That is, for every state s ∈ S: h3(s) =h1(s) + h2(s) 2 h4(s) =h1(s) + h2(s) where h1 and h2 are defined as “the number of misplaced tiles”, and “the sum of the distances of the tiles from their goal positions”, respectively. Are h3 and h4 admissible? If admissible, compare their dominance with respect to h1 and h2, if not, provide a counterexample, i.e. a puzzle configuration where dominance does not hold.
6. Let M = (Q,Sigma,s, q0, F) be a dfa and define cfg g= (v,sigma, R,S) as follows: 1. V=Q; 2. For each q in Q and a in sigma, define rule q->aq' where q' = s(q,a); 3. S = q0 Prove L(M) = L(G)
f(n) = n3 - (n2 log2 n) + 2n f(n) ∈ O(n3) by giving the constants (c, n0) and arguing that your constants hold as n goes to infinity by either "chaining up", "chaining down", carefully treating the inequality as an equality and doing some algebra, or even weak induction. Also, what is the minimum value for c (in the definition of O() ) forj this problem and is it an exclusive or inclusive minimum/bound.
2) (L2) Prove using laws of logic that the conditional proposition (p ∧ q) → r is equivalent to (p ∧ ¬ r) →¬ q. 3) (L3) Show that the converse of a conditional proposition p: q → r is equivalent to the inverse of proposition p using a truth table. 4.1) (L4) Show whether ((p ∧ (p→q)) ↔ ¬p) is a tautology or not. Use a truth table and be specific about which row(s)/column(s) of the truth table justify your answer. 4.2) (L4) Give truth values for the propositional variables that cause the two expressions to have different truth values. For example, given p ∨ q and p ⊕ q, the correct answer would be p = q = T, because when p and q are both true, p ∨ q is true but p ⊕ q is false. Note that there may be more than one correct answer. r ∧ (p ∨ q) (r ∧ p) ∨ q
Suppose A is a Boolean formula which is constructed using only the two connectives ∨ and ∧. Let c(A) denote the complexity of A and s(A) denote the number of subformuale of A. Prove using the induction on the complexity of the formula A that s(A) = 2c(A) + 1.
Please answer the following question in depth with full detail. Suppose that we are given an admissible heuristic function h. Consider the following function: 1-h'(n) = h(n) if n is the initial state s. 2-h'(n) = max{h(n),h'(n')−c(n',n)} where n' is the predecessor node of n. where c(n',n) min_a c(n',a,n). Prove that h' is consistent.
3. Use Indirect proof for the following problem. BE SURE TO SHOW ALL OF YOUR WORK. 1. ~P > Q 2. ~R > (~P . ~S) 3. ~S > ~Q / R
Consider a proof of the following fact: For all n ≥ 4, 2n ≥ n2 What should be proven in the inductive step?(mcqs) a) For n=4, 2n ≥ n^2 b) For n=1, 2n ≥ n2 c) For every k ≥ 4, if 2k ≥ k2, then 2k+1 ≥ (k+1)2 d) 2k ≥ k2
The function below has the recursive relation T(x,y) = 2T(y/2)+O(1) when x,y>0Knowing these information, find the following: 1) The worst-case time complexity of the function2) The worst-case auxiliary space complexity of the function3) Explanation as to how the time complexity of the function can be improved without using multiplication operations.