A consumer is willing to trade 4 units of x for 1 unit of y when she is consuming bundle (8, 1). She is also willing to trade in 1 unit of x for 2 units of y when she is consuming bundle (4, 4). She is indifferent between these two bundles. Assuming that the utility function is Cobb-Douglas of the form U(x,y)=xα yβ, where α and β are positive constants, what is the utility function for this consumer?

A consumer is willing to trade 4 units of x for 1 unit of y when she is consuming bundle (8, 1). She is also willing to trade in 1 unit of x for 2 units of y when she is consuming bundle (4, 4). She is indifferent between these two bundles. Assuming that the utility function is Cobb-Douglas of the form U(x,y)=xα yβ, where α and β are positive constants, what is the utility function for this consumer?

Microeconomic Theory

12th Edition

ISBN:9781337517942

Author:NICHOLSON

Publisher:NICHOLSON

Chapter3: Preferences And Utility

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 3.14P

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Suppose a consumer is indifferent between the bundles (x1, x2) = (20, 10) and (15, 16), and suppose that the same consumer prefers the bundle (19, 9) to both. Is there anything wrong about her preferences when evaluated against the standard assumptions of consumer preferences?
A young consumer has to decide how to spend his spare time. He can either watch movies x or play online video games y. Each round of the game cost 20 and each movie cost 20. He has 200 dollars to spend each week. In addition, he has time constraint. He can spend no more than 20 hours for entertainment each week. A movie last 2 hours and playing a game takes about 1 hour. His utility is given by √xy. Use the Kuhn-Tucker condition to find his optimal choice. (Assume that x and y can take any value, not necessarily integers.) Does the solution satisfy the necessary and sufficient condition for a maximum?
It is given that a typical consumer has a well-behaved preference structure for his consumption bundle, which includes only two goods, A and B. Further, assume that commodity A is normal and commodity B is Giffen. By keeping commodity A on the x-axis and commodity B on the y-axis, you are required to show the price decomposition for commodity B when $PB decreases exogenously relative to $PA.
Given the utility function: U = X3/4 .Y1/4 Find out the optimal quantities of the two commodities using Lagrange method and simplified procedure, if it is given that price of X is Rs.6 and price of Y is Rs.3 and income is equal to Rs.120.
A typical consumer has a well-behaved preference structure for his consumption bundle which includes only two goods, A and B. assume that commodity A is normal and commodity B is inferior. By keeping commodity A on the x-axis and commodity B on the y-axis you are required to show the price decomposition for commodity B when $PB increases exogenously relative to $PA. Please Answer the question by using well labelled diagrams
If a competitive consumer chooses consumption program x=(20,5,7) at competitive prices p=(2,1,5), consumption program y=(15,10,6) at competitive prices p’=(3,1/2,5) then under the usual assumptions, A) violates the weak axiom of revealed preference (WARP) B) doesn’t violate WARP and exhibit direct revealed preference for x with respect to y. C) doesn’t violate WARP and exhibit direct revealed preference for y with respect to x. D) doesn’t violate WARP and doesn’t exhibit any direct revealed preference between x and y. E) NOPAC
If the initial distribution of two goods between two people is Pareto optimal, which of the following statements is TRUE? A. It is possible to reallocate the goods between the two people so as to increase the utility of both people. B. It is possible to reallocate the goods between the two people so as to increase the utility of one person without decreasing the utility of the other. C. It is possible to reallocate the goods between the two people so as to increase the utility of one person, but only at the expense of the other person. D. It is impossible to reallocate the goods between the two people so as to increase either person's utility. E. None of the above
Consider two treatments. Treatment 1 saves one year of life at a cost of $10,000. Treatment 2 saves ten years of life at a cost of $1,000,000. Which treatment is more cost-effective? Why? Consider two treatments. Treatment 1 saves six years of quality adjusted life at a cost of $90,000. Treatment 2 saves three years of quality adjusted life at a cost of $60,000. Which treatment is preferred from a cost utility analysis perspective? Suppose Jay has been experiencing back pain and that there are two options for back pain: Treatment Regimen Total Cost Pain Reduction Do nothing $0 0 units Cortisone injections $600 30 units Calculate the ICER between cortisone injections and doing nothing. Jay says he is willing to pay $10 for a per unit of pain reduction. Should he choose cortisone injections? Another treatment is discovered. It costs $700 and reduces pain by 25 units. Should he choose the new treatment?
A consumer utility function is U=(x1,x2) Where X1 is the quantity of good 1 that is bought, X2 is the quantity of good 2 that is bought. The price of good 1 is $10 and the price for good 2 is $2. If the consumer's income is $100 what will the consumer's optimal utility level be? b. Using Lagrange multilplier method. optimise the utility function x0.25 y0.25 subject to the budget constraint 24=x/10+y
Describe the two approaches of utility analysis !
Which of the FF. statements is correct regarding the preference of the consumers when the income of the consumer can only be spent between apples and oranges? Assume that apples are written on the vertical axis while oranges are written on the horizontal axis A. when the consumer has few oranges, he is willing to trade more apple to get another orange B. when the consumer has so many oranges already, he will only exchange less apples for an orange C. the declining slope of the indifference curve shows the marginal value of oranges is declining D. all are correct E. none is correct
Assuming, there are two goods: Coffee and Tea. Your budget is 18,000 KRW per day. The price of Coffee ranges between 0 KRW to 6,000 KRW. The price of Tea ranges between 0 and 5,000 KRW Specify your indifference map of your preference relation Specify your utility function Specify a budget constraint based on the assumption above Specify your own-price offer curves for coffee Specify your curve Engel curve for coffee